• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the international situation in 1933 favour Hitler's foreign policy aims?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the international situation in 1933 favour Hitler's foreign policy aims? Although in 1933 Germany was still to some extent a pariah nation, and many countries were still cautious of Germany's actions; the international climate in which Hitler was operating actually favoured his foreign policy aims. Germany was still regarded by Western nations as a defeated state, under the constraints of the Versailles Treaty. This was emphasised by the fact that at first Hitler's foreign policies were moderate and cautious; any action was matched with a peaceful, diplomatic gesture. So to a certain extent in 1933 Germany was underestimated. Britain appeared to be fairly, willing to be pragmatic and acquiescent. Its general policy was that the Versailles Treaty had been unfair on Germany and needed revision. Although France favoured a tougher line against Germany, they were in a particularly weak position due to their domestic situation and relied increasingly on Britain. France was unable to take an independent line in foreign affairs; they would have liked to have taken a tougher line on Germany but were unable to do so as Britain allowed Hitler a free hand. To add to this, the general international situation was greatly affected at this time by the worldwide economic depression. ...read more.

Middle

This benefited Hitler significantly, as had it not been for Britain's moderation, France would have been able to take a much tougher line against Germany. Poland was a potential obstacle to German expansionism; it had a strong army and the military-style dictatorship could have been a serious threat. However much of their military equipment was outdated, and their tactics were not suitable for modern warfare. Due to the large German minority, fighting Poland would have proven difficult. Adding to this, Poland was allied with France, making Hitler's position even more secure due to France's weak position. The rise of nationalism in Japan also benefited Hitler's aims. The military style leadership and expansionist ideas put pressure on the eastern Empires, such as Australia and India, therefore taking the attention away from Hitler's expansionist ideas. America's isolationism also favoured Hitler's foreign policy aims. The world's foremost power had little intention to try to contain Hitler in what was seen as a European affair. The situation in Russia in 1933 also favoured Hitler's aims. One of his most significant foreign policies was lebensraum; Hitler believed that in order to accommodate the Teutonic empire, expansion to the East was highly necessary. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore Hitler would be unable to mount any counterattack if France entered Germany. Although it looked on the surface unfavourable to Hitler's foreign policies, the international situation had many major flaws that would have allowed Hitler to achieve his aims without fearing any retaliation from other world powers. Although many elements were against him, if looked at carefully the international situation in itself did favour Hitler. Great Britain were content to double the German armed forces and allowing a small Luftwaffe, whilst reducing France's. Much of Europe saw any potential threat as coming from the Japanese or Soviet Russia in the east, or was preoccupied with defending their own foreign interest. Europe was also focussing on recuperating from the Great Depression, and many felt it was a time for peace and focussing on internal affairs rather than worrying about what was happening other countries. In 1933 the amendment of Versailles was seen as more acceptable to the world due to work done by the Weimar government. Hitler was also confident that no country or the League of Nations was prepared to take strong steps to counter him unless absolutely unavoidable. Therefore, in 1933 the pursuit of his aims were unlikely to be allowed to continue unchallenged. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The centralised nature of the Party made it relatively easy for Stalin as General secretary to control it through the Secretariat. This had begun under Lenin. * Stalin possessed the organisational skill to develop the Party secretariat into a major power base.

  2. To What Extent Did Mussolini Achieve his Foreign Policy Aims of making Italy "Great ...

    An immediate apology was demanded from Ethiopia and the matter was referred to the League of Nations. Over the next 10 months, Italy prepared for a full-scale invasion of Ethiopia. At first, all seemed well for Mussolini, especially as Britain and France were unwilling to condemn his attitude.

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    However, by the end of the 1930's Germany was in a crisis because of the wrong rearmament policies used, and industries owed by big industrialists became simple 'functional elites' whose power was subordinated to Hitler's authority.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    More money spent on arms = boom late 1930s. Who benefited from Nazi Economic Policies? Proletariat Worker's real wages were lower in 1938 than they had been since 1928, but by late 1930s most workers were better off than in 1932. German Labour Front improved working conditions - 'beauty of work programme', 'strength through joy' provided variety of activities

  1. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    Ian Kershaw (1985) does agree with Burleigh and creates a very understandable argument. However, Kershaw does mention that the "Overall structure of government was reduced to a shambles of constantly shifting powers bases or warring factors"4 Hitler's personality did play a massive part in the government, however to whether this made him weak is another matter.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    the Soviets, and begged him to explain what had brought about the existing state of affairs. Schulenburg professed himself unable to say, and departed. A few hours later, however, he was back with all declaration of war on the Soviet Union.

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    ideas to aid warfare not just blindly follow traditions of the good old days. 'Molkte transformed the Prussian general staff into the most effective army leadership in Europe'7 However Molkte was a wildcard and he didn't turn up trumps, other leaders didn't follow his methods and reverted back to older ways.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    State secured the grain it wanted. It was able to supply the towns with food, and also export grain to pay for imports of technology. Collectivisation supported Stalin?s industrialisation plans. 2. From 1932, collectives were allowed to sell grain left over from State procurements in a collective farm market ? the only free markets allowed in the USSR.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work