• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the lack of Muslim unity assist the Crusaders in winning their victories?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the lack of Muslim unity assist the Crusaders in winning their victories? 24 Marks Muslim disunity certainly contributed to the success of the crusaders, however this was only a part of the overall reasons for their victories. By 1079, the overall object for the First Crusade, Jerusalem, was in control of the Christian Crusaders; which was in itself was a the major success of its time. The planning which all went into the First Crusade, the timely reinforcements, and the help of the Byzantine Empire were all major factors that contributed to the success. There was a divide within the Muslims, especially when involving politics, but also a religious element in Islam. This led to internal problems and wars, and the many leaders that this affected used their armies and power against each other. His was in itself a distraction from what could have been used as a strong, united Muslim army against the Christian crusaders. However because of the diffraction from within the power struggling Turks, this was prevented from happening and essentially helped the crusaders in their victories at strategic cities, such as Antioch and eventually Jerusalem. ...read more.

Middle

Ridwan of Aleppo brought his army to aid the city when surrounded by the crusaders, only for it to be ambushed by them in February 1098, as the army of his brother Kerbogha of Mosul approached. There was a disunity apparent within the siblings themselves, even within the intention of them travelling to Antioch. Kerbogha insisted on attempting a siege of the city, as it seemed that he believed if he conquered Antioch he'd have a chance of taking control of the throne of the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad, where the political system was in turmoil. It resulted in a full attack with the Franks who had by this time taken over the city, in which as it moved as an advantage to the crusaders, the Muslims abandoned the losing battle. Although Kerbogha's army was built up of an impressive size, it still had a very fatal weakness; a lack of one Muslim leader. It was built up of many Syrian amirs', which none of them wanted to see Mosul establish a somewhat control over them, which was the aim of Kerbogha, which resulted in there being many conspiracies against his leadership. ...read more.

Conclusion

Extracting oaths from the principal figures that any conquests would be handed over to him, he provided supplies, additional troops and targets. There is also a great importance in the strength and power of the Crusaders aiding success. An example of this was at the Damascus, where it was in fact the skill and underestimation of the crusaders that won the battle. The experienced leadership of some of the crusaders, such as that of Bohemond and Raymond of Toulouse also had an important impact on determining a great success. A combination of their skill and knowledge, and ability to inspire their men proved successful in their intentions. It seems that Muslim disunity and later the lack of preparation of the Fatimids when they had to defend Jerusalem, certainly contributed to the success' of the Crusade and was perhaps the most significant factor. However it seems crusading historiography has tended to overlook the part played by the crusaders in their own victory. That victory was achieved by a combination of determination, religious conviction and leadership which was crucial in holding the army together alongside intelligent strategy and skill in fighting. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    It is commonly agreed by the leading crusader figures, that Richard's capture of Cyprus in May 1191 was a key victory for the crusaders. Prior to the crusade the island of Cyprus had claimed its independence from the Byzantine Empire under its leader Isaac Ducus Comenus.

  2. Assess the factors that lead to the defeat of Boudica and the Iceni in ...

    The Romans effectively created a wall of soldiers that could not be attacked from the rear nor could it be flanked.9 Suetonius had examined the earlier successes of Boudica's army, determined their weaknesses and how to minimise their strengths. Through such clever placement Suetonius was able to take away the one clear advantage the Celts had.

  1. Roman Army

    Clearly, corruption and individual negligence were characteristics not unique to Roman political life. Contrary to popular belief, much of the famed Greek political tradition was based upon autocratic ideals more than democracy, and corruption between elected officials was similarly rife in Athens as in Rome.

  2. The First English Civil War

    On 11 July he came down and invested Hopton's foot in Devizes itself. The Royalist cavalry, Hertford and Maurice with them, rode away towards Salisbury. But although the siege of Devizes was pressed with such vigour that an assault was fixed for the evening of 13 July, the Cornishmen, Hopton directing the defence from his bed, held out stubbornly.

  1. William's Victory

    Until then, the English had been able to keep the Normans at bay as their attacks against them proved to be insignificant. William of Poitiers explains this event as the Normans '...suddenly wheeling their horses surrounded them and cut down their pursuers so that not one was left alive.

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    In the 900's the Abbasid Caliphate controled the middle east and the empire stretched from the borders of India to the Northern coast of Africa. It was well organised and had vast economic resource from eygpt. if the Crusade had been lauched at this time it would surely have been crushed instantly.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Also, other, personal, goals such as increasing wealth or getting land or simply need in adventure were achieved by many. Therefore we could argue that the First Crusade cannot be classified as a failure, in fact it was a great success that inspired many Christians and strengthened the power and prestige of Catholic Church.

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    crowned king of England in Westminster Abbey on the 25th December 1066. In 1067 to establish an absolute monarchy and total control over England William distributed land to trusted Norman Barons to put down any sign of rebellion against Norman rule.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work