• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the lack of Muslim unity assist the Crusaders in winning their victories?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the lack of Muslim unity assist the Crusaders in winning their victories? 24 Marks Muslim disunity certainly contributed to the success of the crusaders, however this was only a part of the overall reasons for their victories. By 1079, the overall object for the First Crusade, Jerusalem, was in control of the Christian Crusaders; which was in itself was a the major success of its time. The planning which all went into the First Crusade, the timely reinforcements, and the help of the Byzantine Empire were all major factors that contributed to the success. There was a divide within the Muslims, especially when involving politics, but also a religious element in Islam. This led to internal problems and wars, and the many leaders that this affected used their armies and power against each other. His was in itself a distraction from what could have been used as a strong, united Muslim army against the Christian crusaders. However because of the diffraction from within the power struggling Turks, this was prevented from happening and essentially helped the crusaders in their victories at strategic cities, such as Antioch and eventually Jerusalem. ...read more.

Middle

Ridwan of Aleppo brought his army to aid the city when surrounded by the crusaders, only for it to be ambushed by them in February 1098, as the army of his brother Kerbogha of Mosul approached. There was a disunity apparent within the siblings themselves, even within the intention of them travelling to Antioch. Kerbogha insisted on attempting a siege of the city, as it seemed that he believed if he conquered Antioch he'd have a chance of taking control of the throne of the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad, where the political system was in turmoil. It resulted in a full attack with the Franks who had by this time taken over the city, in which as it moved as an advantage to the crusaders, the Muslims abandoned the losing battle. Although Kerbogha's army was built up of an impressive size, it still had a very fatal weakness; a lack of one Muslim leader. It was built up of many Syrian amirs', which none of them wanted to see Mosul establish a somewhat control over them, which was the aim of Kerbogha, which resulted in there being many conspiracies against his leadership. ...read more.

Conclusion

Extracting oaths from the principal figures that any conquests would be handed over to him, he provided supplies, additional troops and targets. There is also a great importance in the strength and power of the Crusaders aiding success. An example of this was at the Damascus, where it was in fact the skill and underestimation of the crusaders that won the battle. The experienced leadership of some of the crusaders, such as that of Bohemond and Raymond of Toulouse also had an important impact on determining a great success. A combination of their skill and knowledge, and ability to inspire their men proved successful in their intentions. It seems that Muslim disunity and later the lack of preparation of the Fatimids when they had to defend Jerusalem, certainly contributed to the success' of the Crusade and was perhaps the most significant factor. However it seems crusading historiography has tended to overlook the part played by the crusaders in their own victory. That victory was achieved by a combination of determination, religious conviction and leadership which was crucial in holding the army together alongside intelligent strategy and skill in fighting. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    His subsequent hostility towards the crusaders on their arrival warranted a total conquest of the island by Richard. The Intinerarrium records that "He [Richard] had found castles crammed with treasures and wealth of every kind." The conquest had as Gillingham writes "reaped tremendous awards.

  2. Why did Britain not establish an independant Palestine jointly ruled by Arabs and Jews ...

    is English", while for others this meant a Jewish protectorate or sanctuary located in Palestine. To further complicate matters , when the Sykes-Picot agreement surfaced at the end of WWI Arabs were outraged, since in essence it contradicted the Hussein-McMahon Letters as France and Britain agreed to carve up the recently liberated Arab lands.

  1. Assess the factors that lead to the defeat of Boudica and the Iceni in ...

    Tacitus describe the position as follows7 "...He chose a position approached by a narrow defile and secured in the rear by a forest, first satisfying himself that there was no trace of an enemy except in his front, and that the plain there was devoid of cover and allowed no suspicion of an ambuscade."

  2. How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya?

    The traditional social hierarchy prevailed, where these peasants would blindly obey the Sultans, who in turn obeyed the British. These Kaum Muda anti-British radical ideals of revolution were at odds with the Sultans beliefs and the keeping of the status quo.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Seljuk prince of Aleppo, who was coming in with a great army and with whom relations in Syria were previously hostile. Thus we can argue that this was further mistake made by Christians, as they lost their superiority when they won Muslims in First Crusade due to them being not

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    But, the Crusader's won all their battles, some in which they were vastly outnumbered, and took cities that seemed impregnable, this suggests that their Military Prowess was the Main factor in the sucess. The Crusaders came from a warrior culture, for them, fighting was a career, so coupled with Pope

  1. Maos Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the 1945 Civil War. ...

    By 1946, China was in economic turmoil, with corruption and rioting spreading fast, and anti-Nationalist strikes taking place in the cities. The GMD tried to resolve this by borrowing further international funds, and printing more notes. Money now had hardly any value, and with little support for the party the

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    exception of the three wars that he partook in, furthermore, a larger hint that Louise may have been close to absolute power is what he advised to his heir on his deathbed; ?Do not follow the bad example which I have set you?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work