• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the war bring about a change in the course of the French Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the war bring about a change in the course of the Revolution? David Newsome 08/0303 Up until the beginning of 1792, the French Revolution had been going quite smoothly, with a relatively small amount of bloodshed in relation to the enormity of some of the events. However, it was in April 1792, when war was declared on Austria that events in France took a turn for the worse. With the additional pressures placed on an already faltering economy, and the increased demand for public support, more drastic measures had to be adopted by the government in order to try to control the country. This panic was evident, and this was shown by the "September Massacres", which were essentially the result of a panic reaction caused by the lack of troops defending Paris, who had gone to fight the Austrians after the fall of Verdun. War also aggravated counter-revolutionaries, as well as having a huge influence on the Convention, and the ultimate alignment of the Plain behind the Montagnards, and the subsequent ability to pass legislation to suppress those who were opposed to the revolution. This was the start of the Terror, and caused the power struggle within the government that gave it the ability to be authoritarian in the way that it was to be. ...read more.

Middle

It was partly because of this need for the support of the Sans-Culottes that the Montagnards pursued their desire for the execution of Louis so strongly. Even though every member in the convention agreed that Louis was guilty of crimes against the state, the assembly voted in favour of his execution by 387 votes to 334, a smaller majority than one may have expected. In executing Louis they lost a possible bargaining tool with foreign powers, but they also eliminated the possibility of Louis managing to escape abroad and return with an army to overthrow the revolution, and he almost did when fleeing to Varennes. A further problem for the Convention was the increasing numbers of riots and uprisings in provincial areas. These were going on for a long time before the outbreak of war, but were definitely affected and intensified by the war. The most famous of these uprisings was in the Vend�e. In this region the peasants had been growing increasingly discontented with the new governments, as they were paying more taxes than they had been under the Ancien R�gime, and as a result of this they disliked the new revolutionary government. This dislike turned to hatred when the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, which had been strongly resisted in the area as it was full of non-jurors, a resistance that was encouraged by the regions priests. ...read more.

Conclusion

This made his a dangerous figure, but he was one never to have great public support, preferring to live in comfort away from the public eye. In conclusion, the war has to be seen as the single most influential factor to this period of French history. Although many of the events that happened between 1792-3 were already in the pipeline well before the war broke out, it bought them more out into the open and also provoked them further. An example of this is the Terror in the Vend�e, where the issue of conscription only angered further a province much disillusioned with the revolution already. The war also bought about other events, such as the September Massacres - a total panic reaction to the lack of troops defending Paris after the initial failure of the war. On the other hand, there were some events that would have happened, regardless of the war. I think that Louis was always going to be executed, and that the Montagnards would have dominated the Convention whether there had been the war or not. Either way that you look at the events, most of them were not out rightly caused by the war, but most of them were definitely changed by it and it was the most important event of the revolution so far. War definitely changed the revolution, more for the worse than the better. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    - Not surprisingly, the US was totally unprepared: The DRs debt reduction program had essentially reduced the army and navy to? total crap [the navy had a whopping 17 ships]. Nobody enlisted in the national army, only in some of the state militias.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    incentives to produce more output as they could make a profit and now keep it. Russian civilians seemed to be content with all these changes and these uprisings stopped. "The New Economic Policy (NEP) produced its first positive results in the spring of 1921.

  1. During the course of this essay I will be investigating a play called 'All ...

    got a process, the process don't work you're out of business; you don't know how to operate, your stuff is no good; they close you up, they tear up your contracts, what the hell is it to them?' When Joe said this statement he finished it off, his voice cracking,

  2. The Great Terror in Leningrad: a Quantitative Analysis.

    Khlevnyuk argues that the Stalinist leadership always considered terror as its main method of struggle with a potential 'fifth column'. The cruel repression of 1937-8 was above all determined by biographical particulars.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Matters came to a head on June 8 1978 when a local Phalange leader, Joud el Bayeh, was murdered by six armed men sent by Tony Franjieh. Bashir Gemayel decided to strike back. On June 13, 1978, Gemayel launched a surprise attack that decimated the Marada Brigade, Tony Franjieh was killed in the attack.

  2. Was it the technological or tactical changes which had the greater influence in determining ...

    for the military to follow suit and it is from this that professional armies start to arise. From a few experienced captains and armorers held on retainer, the permanent armed forces of Europe's cities and city-states tended to increase during the fourteenth century to fairly substantial sizes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work