• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you accept the view that the USA and the USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by the end of the fighting in Europe in May 1945?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you accept the view that the USA and the USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by the end of the fighting in Europe in May 1945? I agree to some extent that the USA and USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by 1945 due to their ideological differences which contradicted the beliefs of the other nation. The USA believed in a democratic world which would benefit the economic interests of the USA with free open markets. However the USSR with its new position in the world aimed to improve its security by spreading its communist influence in neighbouring countries. Security was an important issue due to its past experiences of being attacked by the west through Eastern Europe such as the west's intervention in the Russian civil war of 1917-18. This experience therefore led the Soviet Union to have a mutual suspicion of the motives of the USA and the west during the war. Therefore the USA and USSR were already divided by 1945. However they were not completely divided as they managed to become allies in their fight against Nazi Germany. The fact that they were able to unite to fight a common cause which was to defeat Nazi Germany illustrates that they were not divided by irreconcilable differences by 1945. ...read more.

Middle

'The wish to establish a security buffer' (source 2) was reinforced further when the western allies delayed the opening of the second front. This led Stalin to believe that the west wanted to see the USSR destroyed before they defeated Nazi Germany. Source 2 an author of the revisionist school of thought therefore implies that the USA and USSR were not completely divided by irreconcilable differences as the two sides could have potentially remained as allies had Truman tried to understand the actions of the USSR to be in the best interest of the security of the Soviet Union. The power vacuum created in Eastern Europe exposed the differences between the two nations as both fought to compete in spreading their ideological influences that suited their interest as outlined in source 3 which is from the post-revisionist perspective. The USSR took Eastern Europe under its wing so that she could rebuild her economy using the resources of the eastern European states. SU was determined to improve its security by weakening countries around it especially Eastern Europe. However, Source 3 realises that this idea of Soviet 'friendly governments in eastern Europe clashed with Americas long-term interests.' The USA competed to spread its influence in Europe in order to keep an open market to sell American made goods. ...read more.

Conclusion

Moreover this suggests that the two countries were not completely divided due to their differences but it was rather down to the personalities of the leaders of both countries that led to a division. Change in power in US government meant SU and USA could not resolve their differences. Roosevelt wanted to continue the policy of containment which had helped the two countries come to agreement on the spheres of influence in Europe. However when Truman came to power following the death of Roosevelt the division between the two states deepened with Truman keen not to be seen as being soft on communism. Therefore he adopted a tougher stance on the USSR as he did not want to appease the Stalin as he the west did with Hitler which eventually led to the SWW. In conclusion the USA and USSR were not completely divided by irreconcilable differences because if they were they would have gone in conflict after the western allied intervention in the Russian civil war of 1917. However by 1945 due to their conflicting post war aims they began to show signs of hostility and division. But they could have remained as allies had the USA understood the USSR's insecurities. Moreover the USSR may have continued to cooperate with the USA as they had done throughout the war had Truman not decided to be openly anti-communist and difficult to get along with. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The author has a strong understanding of events and links source material well with own knowledge. Links to the question get clearer towards the end. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How important was foreign intervention in the unification of Italy by 1870?

    4 star(s)

    The unification of south Italy with north Italy was a responsibility the Italians took upon themselves. Garibaldi, an adventurer that was able to conquer south Italy (of course with the secret support of King Charles Albert). After his adventure he finally surrendered his conquest to the Piedmontese King.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was America's policy of containment successful? Use Korea, Cuba and Vietnam ...

    3 star(s)

    Khrushchev did as he promised. The removal of missiles in Turkey was also negotiated and was kept secret from public. The end of the crisis was a relief for the whole world. A nuclear war was averted through diplomacy and Cuban relations with communist Soviet Union became closer.

  1. Creative Writing - War.

    His laughter was dry, it echoed throughout the jungle. I gazed up at him, and then busted out into tears. They had blindfolded us for the last few miles of the journey. With my hands tied firmly behind my back, I was flung against a tough wall.

  2. To what extent was Stalin to blame for the Berlin crisis 1948-9?

    Miscamble focuses on Stalin's intention to pressure the West into rethinking their proposal, inflicting a "political defeat'' upon them he suggests would be a ''risky gambit''10, but one Stalin chose to take by applying pressure on West Berlin. Miscamble's argument implies that Stalin had his sight set on stopping Western proposals.

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    which Prussia was the most powerful, and In 1870 Prussian statesman Bismarck won a war against France. This was the start of a new and powerful German Empire: Germany took from France the important industrial area of Alsace Lorraine. The new Germany was successful in industry and by 1914 its

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    group of local of local leaders was produced, who spearheaded future change. The reform was achieved with little bloodshed and on the whole benefited the poor. Basically the communist party offered fair taxes, fair distribution of wealth. Mao, in 1953, went on to devise the first five year plan with the help of Russian advisers.

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five-year plan in 1958 and to what ...

    During he 'first five year plan' the peasants had been set up into lower and higher stage co-operatives, this was to share the workload. In the 'second five year plan' these co-operatives were developed into communes.

  2. Introduction to American drama.

    In 1921 these two recent immigrants, alleged to be anarchists, were found guilty of murder on the flimsiest of evidence and were executed six years later. The 1920s became known as the 'Roaring Twenties'. It was the Jazz Age, the era of the 'flapper' (young women who flouted conventions), mass

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work