• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you accept the view that the USA and the USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by the end of the fighting in Europe in May 1945?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you accept the view that the USA and the USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by the end of the fighting in Europe in May 1945? I agree to some extent that the USA and USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by 1945 due to their ideological differences which contradicted the beliefs of the other nation. The USA believed in a democratic world which would benefit the economic interests of the USA with free open markets. However the USSR with its new position in the world aimed to improve its security by spreading its communist influence in neighbouring countries. Security was an important issue due to its past experiences of being attacked by the west through Eastern Europe such as the west's intervention in the Russian civil war of 1917-18. This experience therefore led the Soviet Union to have a mutual suspicion of the motives of the USA and the west during the war. Therefore the USA and USSR were already divided by 1945. However they were not completely divided as they managed to become allies in their fight against Nazi Germany. The fact that they were able to unite to fight a common cause which was to defeat Nazi Germany illustrates that they were not divided by irreconcilable differences by 1945. ...read more.

Middle

'The wish to establish a security buffer' (source 2) was reinforced further when the western allies delayed the opening of the second front. This led Stalin to believe that the west wanted to see the USSR destroyed before they defeated Nazi Germany. Source 2 an author of the revisionist school of thought therefore implies that the USA and USSR were not completely divided by irreconcilable differences as the two sides could have potentially remained as allies had Truman tried to understand the actions of the USSR to be in the best interest of the security of the Soviet Union. The power vacuum created in Eastern Europe exposed the differences between the two nations as both fought to compete in spreading their ideological influences that suited their interest as outlined in source 3 which is from the post-revisionist perspective. The USSR took Eastern Europe under its wing so that she could rebuild her economy using the resources of the eastern European states. SU was determined to improve its security by weakening countries around it especially Eastern Europe. However, Source 3 realises that this idea of Soviet 'friendly governments in eastern Europe clashed with Americas long-term interests.' The USA competed to spread its influence in Europe in order to keep an open market to sell American made goods. ...read more.

Conclusion

Moreover this suggests that the two countries were not completely divided due to their differences but it was rather down to the personalities of the leaders of both countries that led to a division. Change in power in US government meant SU and USA could not resolve their differences. Roosevelt wanted to continue the policy of containment which had helped the two countries come to agreement on the spheres of influence in Europe. However when Truman came to power following the death of Roosevelt the division between the two states deepened with Truman keen not to be seen as being soft on communism. Therefore he adopted a tougher stance on the USSR as he did not want to appease the Stalin as he the west did with Hitler which eventually led to the SWW. In conclusion the USA and USSR were not completely divided by irreconcilable differences because if they were they would have gone in conflict after the western allied intervention in the Russian civil war of 1917. However by 1945 due to their conflicting post war aims they began to show signs of hostility and division. But they could have remained as allies had the USA understood the USSR's insecurities. Moreover the USSR may have continued to cooperate with the USA as they had done throughout the war had Truman not decided to be openly anti-communist and difficult to get along with. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The author has a strong understanding of events and links source material well with own knowledge. Links to the question get clearer towards the end. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The collapse of the USSR was caused by internal problems and had nothing to ...

    4 star(s)

    Another foundational facet of the containment policy. The US?s policy of containment introduced after WWII in 1947, as part of the Cold War, which pledged to ?reduce Soviet expansionism without liberating already occupied areas, fracturing the communist as far as possible?, among other things kickstarted the arms race which in turn resulted in the USSR devoting a huge amount of its budget on its military.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    But after Bismarck's resignation, his policy was dropped. * 1894: France and Russia signed the Dual Entente, which was intended to be a counterweight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy. * 1904: Britain and France signed The Entente Cordiale, the friendly agreement. It was not a treaty as such, but a settling of long-standing sources of friction.

  1. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    the then leaders were not ready to help each other, the reparations problem for a time ceased to be merely a question between Allied forces and Germany and resolved itself into a diplomatic conflict between the British and French government.The problems arise because Britain wanted Germany to regain her prosperity

  2. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    evidence suggests that Hitler had always insisted on a definitive solution to the Jewish question. . While Hitler's hatred for the Jews was demonstrated through his speeches and of course their removal was core to his creed, how were his strong anti-Semitic views able to translate into policies which saw their ultimate extermination?

  1. Why Was The Great War Not Over By Christmas 1914?

    (About 90% of the troops were originally going to be sent to do this). This would leave only a few troops to hold the French attack on Germany in Alsace and Lorraine. However, the plan was changed in 1914 by General Moltke; he decided to only send about 60% of

  2. Short term and Long term Causes of the Cold War.

    This was called the 'marriage of convenience' because it was not that they were allies that they came together but the fact that both had a common aim and end that was to destroy their enemy. As soon as it looked as though Hitler was going to be defeated the old tension began to re-emerge.

  1. Can War Be Justified?

    Finally, going to war as an ally is justifiable because of the fundamental decency to aid and be loyal to those who would return the support. But this is only when that neighbour's reasons for going to war are acceptable and if their aim is a moral one.

  2. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    This was noticeably a problem in 1914 when the Kaiser alone might have put the breaks on the inexorable progression of the schliffen plan, he found that he did not understand the machinery that he was suppose to control, the Kaiser panicked and allowed a piece of paper to determine events.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work