• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with the view that Hitler was a weak dictator?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you agree with the view that Hitler was a weak dictator? It can be said that during the time the Nazis were in control of Germany the country existed as a Hitler state, but some people argue that this idea comes from the illusion the Nazis created that Hitler would be the one powerful and strong leader to lead Germany back to its former glory. This myth placed Hitler in the role of the nations representative, magnified the idea that he was responsible for all the successes of the government and it reinforced the German tradition for needing a strong leader. ...read more.

Middle

The layout of the Nazi ruler-ship centred directly around Hitler. He was the centrepiece in-between the two parts of the party (the traditional elite's and the Nazis), but most of the decisions made in Nazi Germany were not made by Hitler. His officials who all wanted to please and make decisions in the name of the Fuhrer surrounded him. Hitler had created the initial ideology of the party but he was not the one to enforce it. He was often not in Berlin and was hardly ever seen in public. He created chaos within the party by playing officials off each other and often gave the same piece of work to two people. ...read more.

Conclusion

The question if he was weak or strong in his ruler-ship can be closely linked to the question if the Nazi regime was actually a Hitler state. On one hand he seemed to be very much in control, for example the way he used party members against each other so no one could become too powerful and the way he could absorb an audience into one of his liberating speeches. However, on the other he could have been seen as though he did not have enough knowledge about his own party. If it is true that Hitler was not the strong powerful leader the German people wanted then it is very likely that the Hitler state was nothing more than a fabrication created by others to keep the public happy and to make the Germany they wanted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    and the SD. All these were in charge of looking for groups of revolutionaries, to eliminate opposition and to spy Nazi regime's politicians. However after The Waffen SS, these police forces' influences expanded to a major extend. They were given influence over the army and concentration camps; also the SS

  2. Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

    The personal nature of his dictatorship was illustrated by the new oath of the army to Hitler personally. Therefore, to the outside world Hitler seemed to be the embodiment of a strong personal dictator. However, as historians have investigated the workings of the Nazi state many have come to revise their view of Hitler.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    This meant that if one party got just 25% or more of the votes cast in an election they would get 66% of the seats in parliament, enough to give the party a clear majority and therefore a monopoly over parliament.

  2. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    However, Hitler became Chancellor to President Hindenburg in 1933 which meant Hitler did take part in any governmental proceedings. Hindenburg saw Hitler as a great speaker and a potentially good leader for Germany. It was when Hitler received the Enabling Act in 1933 that allowed him to acquire power to be able to produce his dictatorship.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Simultaneously, he moved north to aid the breakthrough by attacking the Germans. However his attack was beaten off and Lord Gort, the commander of the British expeditionary force, disregarded his orders. This was to provoke bitter French recriminations, but in the light of subsequent events the British decision was probably correct.

  2. How far is it accurate to describe Hitler as a 'weak dictator'?

    However, Hitler could on the other hand be seen as an opportunist reacting to external events as he was practically handed the opportunity he fell into after the collapse of the international order. He cannot of had total power as the plots against his own life were a signal that

  1. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    * Interference with plebiscites: Whilst the plebiscites employed by Napoleon may initially be seen as a direct form of popular sovereignty, allowing the people to provide judgement on laws, they were hollow and were a facade to a primarily authoritarian rule.

  2. To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany an entrenched authoritarian state?

    be it due to patriotism or due to the real belief that the Kaiser meant the best for Germany, the people of Germany actually supported his decisions and were willing to put personal differences and opinions aside if it would bring about what the Kaiser desired.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work