• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the impact of World War I explain the outbreak of two revolutions in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent does the impact of World War I explain the outbreak of two revolutions in 1917? The First World War was undoubtedly a major contributing factor towards the outbreak of the two revolutions that took place during 1917, in February and October. The Tsar?s decision to enter the war proved, to be completely detrimental to his hold of power over Russia and arguably led to his abdication in 1917. In 1914, Russia was already facing major issues of its own, politically, socially and economically, and it could be said that Russia?s involvement in the war was a catalyst to worsening the issues. Not only was World War I to blame for the outbreak of the revolutions, there were also other significant elements which led to the revolutions as well. When Russia first agreed to join the Allies in war against Germany, the majority of Russian citizens were supportive of the Tsar?s decision; ?the country united behind the Tsar and his government in an atmosphere of patriotism.?[1] The war started off well for Russia, they obtained a number of successes on the battlefield?the Russian invasion of Eastern Prussia and Galicia proved to be a success; despite their loss in the Battle of Tannenburg, by the end of 1914 Russia controlled almost all of Galicia. ...read more.

Middle

If there was a vacuum of power in the centre of the ruling system, then he was the empty space. In a sense, Russia gained in him the worst of both worlds: a Tsar determined to rule from the throne yet quite incapable of exercising power?.[3] It seems as though the effects of World War I had a huge impact on the outbreaks of the February Revolution, yet during the October Revolution, it appears that other factors had a considerable effect on the outcomes. After the abdication of the Tsar, a Provisional Government formed and took over the running of the country. The new government was made up of a mixture of liberals?mainly Octobrists and Kadets. The Provisional Government introduced some important early reforms ?which it hoped would lay the foundations for a new liberal, democratic Russia?[4]. These included freedom of the press, the release of all political prisoners and the preparation of the calling for a Constituent Assembly which would hopefully draw up a new democratic constitution for Russia. Despite these new improvements, they made the mistake of deciding to continue to keep Russia fighting in the war along with the Allies. Although this decision was destructive to the development of the democratic Provisional Government, it was somewhat unavoidable due to the Allies threatening ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition to their increasing popularity their leader, Lenin, who was a pioneer of Marxist ideology, was relatively important to the coup. However, John Laver suggests that ?Lenin?s role in the coup itself was not crucial?[8], and that it was in fact Trotsky, famously known for being an excellent orator and organiser, who was essential to the October Revolution. The extent at which the First World War was responsible for the two revolutions in 1917 has to view each revolution separately, as the main causes for each were completely different. For the February Revolution, the First World War made the biggest contribution to the downfall of the monarchy and autocracy in 1917. However, despite the same problems being present in October due to the impact of the war, this revolution or ?coup? was more due to the failure of the Provisional Government to provide solutions and the timing of the Bolshevik uprising. The role of Lenin and Trotsky were also paramount to the Bolshevik take over, therefore it can be said that the First World War was responsible for the February Revolution to a large extent but in October 1917, less so, as other factors were contributed more substantially to the coup. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The Russian public turned towards the Bolshevik Party who promised reprieves from all their problems and hardships suffered under the Provisional Government. Lenin had the support of other leading Bolsheviks, including Leon Trotsky, as well as the whole Bolshevik Party and the military.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    They argued that the working class of Russia had no interest or place in the war, and that even victory would offer the common people nothing. Industrialisation and Class Russia's industrial revolution came at the end of the 1800s, and therefore the beginning of the 20th Century marked a huge break in tradition for common people.

  1. The 1917 Revolution.

    The cavalry sent against the Soviet were won over by fellow soldiers, and it was clear that Kornilov had misjudged the amount of effective support which he had. He was arrested and imprisoned. The Army Breaks Up The Provisional Government had been determined from the start to honour Russia's promise

  2. To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World ...

    There were food shortages in the cities despite there being good harvests in the years 1913-16 - this was due to peasants hoarding grain, again due to inflation and also a lack of consumer goods. The army's appropriation of roads and railways to supply troops meant that there were problems with the rail system.

  1. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    Another short-term effect of the Five-Year Plans was that capitalist methods were brought into play. The harder you worked and the more you achieved, then the more you would be rewarded with. This could be described as a 'carrot and stick' approach.

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? What were the results of ...

    From 1914 food prices increased by 300% but wages only increased by 100%. The military defeats of the Russian Army, the food shortages and rising prices, destroyed the support that the Czar had enjoyed in 1914. Growing unrest appeared once more, not only in the army, but in the towns as well.

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Since Germany very much liked the idea of a revolutionist bringing the monarchy to fall, they gave Lenin lots of money to fulfill his wishes. Russia was fighting with the Allied Powers against Germany. Thanks to Russia, Germany had to fight a war on two fronts; on the Western Front facing France, and on the Eastern Front facing Russia.

  2. To what extent was Nicholas II responsible for the outbreak of the revolution in ...

    dumas, he had carried them out and several reforms under his fundamental laws which enabled him resilient control and free will. He had even dissolved them if they were not functioning to his contentment and influence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work