• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the impact of World War I explain the outbreak of two revolutions in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent does the impact of World War I explain the outbreak of two revolutions in 1917? The First World War was undoubtedly a major contributing factor towards the outbreak of the two revolutions that took place during 1917, in February and October. The Tsar?s decision to enter the war proved, to be completely detrimental to his hold of power over Russia and arguably led to his abdication in 1917. In 1914, Russia was already facing major issues of its own, politically, socially and economically, and it could be said that Russia?s involvement in the war was a catalyst to worsening the issues. Not only was World War I to blame for the outbreak of the revolutions, there were also other significant elements which led to the revolutions as well. When Russia first agreed to join the Allies in war against Germany, the majority of Russian citizens were supportive of the Tsar?s decision; ?the country united behind the Tsar and his government in an atmosphere of patriotism.?[1] The war started off well for Russia, they obtained a number of successes on the battlefield?the Russian invasion of Eastern Prussia and Galicia proved to be a success; despite their loss in the Battle of Tannenburg, by the end of 1914 Russia controlled almost all of Galicia. ...read more.

Middle

If there was a vacuum of power in the centre of the ruling system, then he was the empty space. In a sense, Russia gained in him the worst of both worlds: a Tsar determined to rule from the throne yet quite incapable of exercising power?.[3] It seems as though the effects of World War I had a huge impact on the outbreaks of the February Revolution, yet during the October Revolution, it appears that other factors had a considerable effect on the outcomes. After the abdication of the Tsar, a Provisional Government formed and took over the running of the country. The new government was made up of a mixture of liberals?mainly Octobrists and Kadets. The Provisional Government introduced some important early reforms ?which it hoped would lay the foundations for a new liberal, democratic Russia?[4]. These included freedom of the press, the release of all political prisoners and the preparation of the calling for a Constituent Assembly which would hopefully draw up a new democratic constitution for Russia. Despite these new improvements, they made the mistake of deciding to continue to keep Russia fighting in the war along with the Allies. Although this decision was destructive to the development of the democratic Provisional Government, it was somewhat unavoidable due to the Allies threatening ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition to their increasing popularity their leader, Lenin, who was a pioneer of Marxist ideology, was relatively important to the coup. However, John Laver suggests that ?Lenin?s role in the coup itself was not crucial?[8], and that it was in fact Trotsky, famously known for being an excellent orator and organiser, who was essential to the October Revolution. The extent at which the First World War was responsible for the two revolutions in 1917 has to view each revolution separately, as the main causes for each were completely different. For the February Revolution, the First World War made the biggest contribution to the downfall of the monarchy and autocracy in 1917. However, despite the same problems being present in October due to the impact of the war, this revolution or ?coup? was more due to the failure of the Provisional Government to provide solutions and the timing of the Bolshevik uprising. The role of Lenin and Trotsky were also paramount to the Bolshevik take over, therefore it can be said that the First World War was responsible for the February Revolution to a large extent but in October 1917, less so, as other factors were contributed more substantially to the coup. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Perhaps this is because, unlike the village assembly, the soviets were "outside" forms, introduced on a model which fit the town rather than the village. If the peasants were out of step with urban Russia in 1917, it was largely because they were scattered across such a vast expanse of territory.

  2. To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World ...

    There were food shortages in the cities despite there being good harvests in the years 1913-16 - this was due to peasants hoarding grain, again due to inflation and also a lack of consumer goods. The army's appropriation of roads and railways to supply troops meant that there were problems with the rail system.

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    shortages would have been bearable of they had been inspired by the troops. Occasionally there were military successes such as the offensive led by General Bruisilov which brought Austria-Hungary to the point of collapse. Nevertheless ill-equipped and underfed peasants who composed of the army began to desert the army in

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The support from the peasants, army and divisions of the bourgeoisie, as well as the Provisional Governments inability to govern effectively led to a Bolshevik Revolution, led by Lenin. The support of Leon Trotsky, who was released from prison during the Kornilov revolt, and who had been imprisoned during the

  1. Why did the Revolutions of 1848 did not lead to a united Germany?

    The revolutionaries wanted assemblies in their states not a central government, it was only a small number who wanted a central assembly (50 people in the Vorparliament meeting), they got it because the princes were afraid of more revolts but this was an assembly not the creation of a new state.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    lead to his downfall as this led the people to believe that the government was incompetent and wanted a more representative government. With all of this combined, many people became even more dissatisfied with the Tsarist system that was too ineffective under Nicholas and more and more people lost their loyalty to him.

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Since Germany very much liked the idea of a revolutionist bringing the monarchy to fall, they gave Lenin lots of money to fulfill his wishes. Russia was fighting with the Allied Powers against Germany. Thanks to Russia, Germany had to fight a war on two fronts; on the Western Front facing France, and on the Eastern Front facing Russia.

  2. To what extent was Nicholas II responsible for the outbreak of the revolution in ...

    Despite several efforts by previous Tsar?s and Nicholas II Russia was not stable and viable under their control. Therefore, it could be stated that revolution and the end of Tsarism was inevitable. Nicholas II made several decisions during his reign that could have triggered the 1917 Revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work