• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the Reform Act of 1832 deserved to be called Great?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does the Reform Act of 1832 deserved to be called ?Great?? The great reform of 1832 act deserves to be called ?Great? to a certain extent. The Great Reform Act encouraged structure within government and decisions were made more efficiently. For the first time in a long while, the great reform act was the closest perspective different social classes got to see how the future governing body would pursue with their decisions impacting and enabling better lives for civilians. The Great reform act also gave the new middle class a share of power and paved the way for a series of social reforms by the Whigs. So this meant that the middle class people had been recognised into the political system, however we could argue that many of the changes were short term solutions, not long term and they did not benefit the working class as the continuities that remained damaged the working class. Some Historians argue that the Reform Act does not deserve to be called Great as there was limit change after 1832 as the Reform Act did not remove all the inequalities for example they gave the ...read more.

Middle

brought, in modern day, may not seem too radical yet they were the catalyst for future reforms that would benefit the people that had previously suffered in Britain. The main significance is mainly long term, yet with the introduction of reforms the Whig government began to gain confidence and authority with the reforms they were passing. Open boroughs were abolished; this meant that less working class men got the vote. In the past any working class men who were in an open borough at the time of voting were allowed to vote. This shows how the voting rules weren?t made uniform, and it seemed that the rules were made up as they went along. This was ?great? as it meant that the voting was to become more uniform and fair. 56 rotten and pocket boroughs were abolished which meant that more of the population were allowed to vote. Rotten borough?s was where no one could vote, the boroughs were based in the countryside due to the Industrial Revolution. Pocket boroughs were also in the countryside, however only some of the pocket borough public could vote, they would also only have one landowner. ...read more.

Conclusion

Industrial towns such as Manchester, Birmingham and Sheffield were given the chance to elect MP?s for the first time. This change was important as the more industrialised towns were made subject to being represented within parliament therefore getting their views across reducing the geographical imbalance. Although a few industrialised towns got MP?s, there was still a slight geographical imbalance. However, it was reduced which gave more people a voice to speak out and put their ideas across. Also, this change is important as it meant that industrial workers who were given the chance to become MP could speak out for the working classes thus making them more eligible and closer to making a change associated with working conditions. This change contributed to the greatness of the Great Reform Act, because it clearly conveys how people of various status could become part of parliament and join in with voting and electing MP?s. In conclusion the reform deserves to be titled as ?Great? as it was the first major reform of Britain which consisted of many small changes of which combined together produced a greater Britain both within the short-term and long-term. The changes when combined developed equality, fairness, efficiency and rationality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point?

    As a result of the way in which the act was passed, i.e. William IV was forced to rely on Grey after Wellington's failure to form a ministry, it meant that a ministry could now survive without the support of the Crown and Lords but not without the support of the Commons.

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    in rotten boroughs, these were much lower in power now that the large towns had increased electorates and so Whigs now had a much larger majority. It was realised that the bill needed revising substantially, once this was done, along with majorities in Oct 1831 the house was able to pass a reform bill.

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    A vicious cycle ensued and certain publications were banned. Once more, this shows that the reforms seem to have been ill thought out as the effects of them seem to be the exact thing Alexander was intending to move away from or avoid.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    The government was able to manage the affairs of the country, but how could the government properly represent the nation in the House of Commons and the House of Lords if they did not have representatives from the leading Industrial towns?

  1. Why was the first Great Reform Act passed in 1832 and not before?

    in the lead up to the passing of the first Reform Act in 1832. Canning replaced Liverpool as Prime Minister, so increasing instability in government. He replaced some Tories and turned to more conservative Whigs. Some even refused to serve under him7.

  2. To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to fear of ...

    the growing threat of revolution in Britain, saying that political events ran parallel with those on the Continent, to the point where something not unlike a revolutionary situation might have developed in 1831-32'. This was certainly the case in the autumn of 1831 and the Days of May' 1832.

  1. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Mitchell's interpretation of reform (1993) underlines this point. For Mitchell the reform bill was part of the old Whig struggle against the Crown. Senior Whigs believed that liberty and property were inseparable and that more influence for the propertied classes would serve as a barrier against royal tyranny.

  2. How great was the Great Reform Act?

    31 small borough also lost 1 or 2 of their MP?s, which although helps reduce corruption and proportionality, in a way stopped certain sections of society being represented. Another reason why it didn?t deserve to be given the name ?great?, is the rural south was still over represented compared to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work