• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent had the NEP achieved its objectives by 1924?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent had the NEP achieved its objectives by 1924? Hannah Roberts - Jones 13Eld There were many origins of the NEP one being the increasing lack of food and the need to produce more. The Kronstadt revolt of 1921 displayed to Lenin that the loyal supporters that they did have were revolting and showing a lack of support. This was serious as they had few followers anyway. The tamber uprisings also showed that people especially the peasants were unhappy and this needed to change in order for Lenin to keep power. One of the objectives of the NEP was to keep the peasants happy, as they needed them for the industrialisation process that was needed in Russia before a true communist state can be formed. The NEP was crucial in order to keep the system alive as Lenin had already seen many of their true followers going against the system due to the fact that they were unhappy with it. Lenin wished to achieve Symchka that was a hope that the changes that were made by the NEP would bring about a bond between the peasants and the industrial workers. ...read more.


The rise and fall of the Soviet Union. Party do that the party can remain in control. . This was a success, as the peasants did seem to be more pleased with the party. One of the NEP's objectives was to make Russia more industrialised in order to move on to the final stage, which is a true communist state. Taking into consideration that the NEP was working from a very low base this can be seen as a success as widespread electrification was introduced, transport and communication also slowly improved as it was helped by the importation of over 1000 new engines from Germany and Sweden. This new equipment showed that Lenin was prepared for heavy industrialisation. Russia had become more industrialised as Steel increased from 183 thousand tons in 1921 to 3,141 thousand tons in 1926 this is an increase of 2,958 thousand tons. This shows that an attempt at industrialisation was a success. Through the NEP allowing the introduction of money being allowed this encouraged production levels to increase. This shows that Lenin stabilised the economy by giving the peasants purchasing power. This shows that the NEP achieved one of its objectives by attempting to solve the problem that money was devalued. ...read more.


This would have created a wide gap in the economic field especially. Many also feared that this would mean that the peasants would lose support for the party. The NEP didn't solve the economic problems facing Russia, as there was a reliance on small-scale farming most of which were uneconomic units. They simply couldn't produce the levels required for the transition to the desired communist state. This displays that the NEP failed to be able to be a path to the desired communist state as it created to many obstacles. In conclusion the NEP did improve the lives of some people especially after the effects of war communism. If they didn't so something in 1921 a revolution against them could have occurred and they would have lost power and the NEP prevented this. In the Marxist idea it includes a capitalist state and the only way to achieve this was through gaining capital through NEP. This could be seen that the NEP was vital for survival. However, the NEP in the long run created more problems the majority lying in the heart of the Marxist ideology. Although the NEP achieved some of its objectives such as stabilising Russia it created more obstacles that went against the party ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    a measure of economic liberalisation were implemented otherwise known as the NEP. In contrast, things became even worse for the workers under the NEP; some had called it the 'New Exploitation of the Proletariat'.30 They were less happy than the peasants due to a steep rise in unemployment in its first two years.

  2. Soviet State

    * The Stalinist strategy succeeded for several decades, but only because it enjoyed some specific advantages. Fist, the techniques it borrowed from abroad gave a sharp boost to productivity. Second, it ruled the largest country in the world, meaning that vast human and material resources were available if it could mobilise them.

  1. What had the Bolsheviks achieved by 1914?

    In this respect the fact the Bolsheviks learned lessons is a large achievement in itself as other political opposition parties did not make this vital step. Due to the bourgeoisies weakness Lenin was not prepared to work with them, mainly because they would be abolished in a revolution soon after they took power.

  2. War communism and NEP

    All these measures also went along with the future policies of Bolshevism and so War Communism is argued that it brought Russia to the closest ever to true Communism. The Bolsheviks believed the First World War destroyed the old world and now they could make anew with the theory of Karl Marx.

  1. Free essay

    Examine the impact of policy changes of 1921 on the development of the Soviet ...

    Dissolution provoked opposition from other socialist groups and Russia was still at war with Germany. On the 7th December 1917, the CHEKA(secret police) was set up and proved to be an effective mechanism in dealing with opposition and after the closure of the constituent assembly, repression intensified and the CHEKA

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Culture determined by the state. Creative energy was not allowed to blossom. 6. A conservative ethos. The party hierarchy, in practice became conservative and in many respects was resistant to change. Stalinism was not a term used by Stalin himself, but by people after his death in 1953 to identify the characteristics of the USSR.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work