• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has the agenda of world politics changed by the al-Quaeda attacks on the USA on September 11th 2001?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent has the agenda of world politics changed by the al-Quaeda attacks on the USA on September 11th 2001? Since the end of the Second World War, various forms of threat have challenged global order. Clearly nothing since 1945 has been so devastating, but waves in the ocean that is the modern world order have challenged global leaders into difficult times. At first with the continuing rise to power of the Soviet Union and their massive efforts to strive towards nuclear domination against the United States, the world braced itself for the onset of potential nuclear war. Never was this so evident than in 1962 and the events of the Cuban missile crisis. But as the Cold War slowly came to an end with the dismantling of the USSR, world politics looked to be finally settling towards a far more peaceful period. "The international community is now pre-occupied with other issues such as the search for a 'New World Order', the disparities in wealth between developed and developing countries and environmental issues" (White, Little & Smith, 2001, p2), but on September 11th 2001, it became clear that this agenda needed to be firmly changed. A terrorist group had killed thousands on American soil, though many would argue that it was not unexpected (Fred Halliday quotes in 'The World in 2000' having discussed the embassy bombings in East Africa which were also linked to al-Quaeda that: "there is no reason to believe that such actions will not recur..."(Halliday, 2001 (pre Sept 11th), p51)), it changed Western foreign policies. ...read more.

Middle

(Halliday, 2001, p51) It was of little surprise that just one month after the September 11th atrocities, Afghanistan was once again under attack. This time however the US led attack was far more ruthless in its attempts to not only to end the Taliban regime, known for its extensive links to al-Quaeda, but to destroy al-Quaeda, its camps, its training ground and its infamous leader; Osama Bin Laden. The main issues arising from the war in Afghanistan was one of fairness, was this a Just War? The question of a Just War is the hardest arising from the post September 11th political agenda. Jean Bethke Elshtain states that "a carefully worked out and unprovoked act of terror against non-combatants of one's own country is injury - an act of war - that demands a response" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, p263). Afghanistan was that response. But with September 11th it is difficult to target an enemy, who by their very nature are covert and underground. In attacking Afghanistan the coalition forces were targeting al-Quaeda, but at the same time they were demolishing the Taliban regime, a power that were clearly not the perpetrators of September 11th. However this is in George Bush's own words a 'War on Terror, and as the Taliban had been sympathetic of al-Quaeda then the dismantling of their regime allowed for a country to be eradicated of terrorist cells. In this sense it is arguable to entitle the confrontation Just. ...read more.

Conclusion

September 11th was merely the catalyst that accelerated the political machine into full force. Both al-Quaeda and America were fighting a war: "Each putting their global coalitions together and mounting attacks into the enemy heartland over long distances, but the principles behind their operations were timeless" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, p45). I have focused mainly on the United States during this essay and for the one good reason that no other country was greater effected by September 11th as America. "The United States is the keystone in the arch of a hegemonic order in world politics" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, p234) But asked how 'world politics' has been changed, we must consider that the United States plays a massive role in the contemporary world arena, and whatever they choose to do in terms of their global agenda, it sends reverberations around the world. But with the recent war in Iraq, it is clear that not only America considers the threat from terrorists one that needs immediate attention. It has divided many countries opinion, some less keen to actively pursue countries such as Iraq with connections to terrorism. Colin Gray poses the question "has September 11th effected any noticeable major changes in political behaviour within the realist paradigm?" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, pp226-7) For which I would agree with his answer. Really all September 11th has done is reconfirm what was already realised as the new Post Cold War foreign policy, that terrorist organisations exist and must be eradicated. September 11th highlighted the need however, for the process to be increased if such atrocities are to be avoided in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Furthermore, there was an inherent problem with the "gun on our hip" approach. As the scientist Vannevar Bush noted, "there is no powder in the gun, [nor] could [it] be drawn," unless the United States were willing to deploy the A-bomb to settle diplomatic disputes.

  2. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    The idea that colonial territories were entitled to become independent, following an election in which rivals for the control of its post-independence government competed for support from indigenous voters, has formed the bedrock for the creation of the African state system and, in most cases, its implementation has been completely unproblematic.

  1. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    The book's limitation, however is that, while it does an admirable job covering the complexities of McCarthyism, there is no simple timeline or overview of events to refer to in order to understand several of the highly specific excerpts. The Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism is written by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Haynes Johnson.

  2. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    Gorbachev appears to be lobbying for support to his new government as a change from the old style politics. The book itself could well be regarded as a presentation letter to the world of the new leader. As it advances (and the text is written later in time)

  1. Timothy W., Luke 'Museum politics: Power plays at the exhibition'

    their display halls can be seen as polemical fortifications meant to hold, through the artful presentation of words, pictures, sounds, and objects, the hearts and minds of visitors.' (p.16) When do these 'cultural wars' break out and when do museums become the subject of 'science wars'?

  2. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    What was the cold war though? Was anyone killed? Did America stand up for democracy and defeat the Soviet Union? Is that while it collapsed? No, not really. There was never a full-scale war, but it was because of the west's influence, and her tainted treasures, that the Soviet Union

  1. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    American rhetoric has placed Islam as the significant other. Lance Morrow refers to September the 11th as a "moment which will separate civilisations of the world from the uncivilised" (Morrow/2001) Western foreign policy especially America "was influenced by a sense of confrontation felt by Westerners when dealing with the East."

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    Is that really the meaning that lives in people's mind? In my opinion -and after questioning a few friends around me- civil would say that terrorism is a very dangerous, terrifying and sorrowful notion which is relatively new. But it's much more realistic than only notional.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work