• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has the agenda of world politics changed by the al-Quaeda attacks on the USA on September 11th 2001?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent has the agenda of world politics changed by the al-Quaeda attacks on the USA on September 11th 2001? Since the end of the Second World War, various forms of threat have challenged global order. Clearly nothing since 1945 has been so devastating, but waves in the ocean that is the modern world order have challenged global leaders into difficult times. At first with the continuing rise to power of the Soviet Union and their massive efforts to strive towards nuclear domination against the United States, the world braced itself for the onset of potential nuclear war. Never was this so evident than in 1962 and the events of the Cuban missile crisis. But as the Cold War slowly came to an end with the dismantling of the USSR, world politics looked to be finally settling towards a far more peaceful period. "The international community is now pre-occupied with other issues such as the search for a 'New World Order', the disparities in wealth between developed and developing countries and environmental issues" (White, Little & Smith, 2001, p2), but on September 11th 2001, it became clear that this agenda needed to be firmly changed. A terrorist group had killed thousands on American soil, though many would argue that it was not unexpected (Fred Halliday quotes in 'The World in 2000' having discussed the embassy bombings in East Africa which were also linked to al-Quaeda that: "there is no reason to believe that such actions will not recur..."(Halliday, 2001 (pre Sept 11th), p51)), it changed Western foreign policies. ...read more.

Middle

(Halliday, 2001, p51) It was of little surprise that just one month after the September 11th atrocities, Afghanistan was once again under attack. This time however the US led attack was far more ruthless in its attempts to not only to end the Taliban regime, known for its extensive links to al-Quaeda, but to destroy al-Quaeda, its camps, its training ground and its infamous leader; Osama Bin Laden. The main issues arising from the war in Afghanistan was one of fairness, was this a Just War? The question of a Just War is the hardest arising from the post September 11th political agenda. Jean Bethke Elshtain states that "a carefully worked out and unprovoked act of terror against non-combatants of one's own country is injury - an act of war - that demands a response" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, p263). Afghanistan was that response. But with September 11th it is difficult to target an enemy, who by their very nature are covert and underground. In attacking Afghanistan the coalition forces were targeting al-Quaeda, but at the same time they were demolishing the Taliban regime, a power that were clearly not the perpetrators of September 11th. However this is in George Bush's own words a 'War on Terror, and as the Taliban had been sympathetic of al-Quaeda then the dismantling of their regime allowed for a country to be eradicated of terrorist cells. In this sense it is arguable to entitle the confrontation Just. ...read more.

Conclusion

September 11th was merely the catalyst that accelerated the political machine into full force. Both al-Quaeda and America were fighting a war: "Each putting their global coalitions together and mounting attacks into the enemy heartland over long distances, but the principles behind their operations were timeless" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, p45). I have focused mainly on the United States during this essay and for the one good reason that no other country was greater effected by September 11th as America. "The United States is the keystone in the arch of a hegemonic order in world politics" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, p234) But asked how 'world politics' has been changed, we must consider that the United States plays a massive role in the contemporary world arena, and whatever they choose to do in terms of their global agenda, it sends reverberations around the world. But with the recent war in Iraq, it is clear that not only America considers the threat from terrorists one that needs immediate attention. It has divided many countries opinion, some less keen to actively pursue countries such as Iraq with connections to terrorism. Colin Gray poses the question "has September 11th effected any noticeable major changes in political behaviour within the realist paradigm?" (Booth & Dunne, 2002, pp226-7) For which I would agree with his answer. Really all September 11th has done is reconfirm what was already realised as the new Post Cold War foreign policy, that terrorist organisations exist and must be eradicated. September 11th highlighted the need however, for the process to be increased if such atrocities are to be avoided in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    which need to be suppressed through "criticism" and "self-criticism". In economical terms, the implementation of Perestroika, on the other hand, required "contracting a comsumer mentality"10. The bureaucracy of maintaining unemployment levels controlled by the state and equality of remuneration, tried to be suppressed, by granting "more independence to enterprises" through autocontability and autofinancing, to reduce corruption from state control.

  2. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    McCarthyism was able to rise because the general public latched onto his anti-elitism. On the other hand, there is the viewpoint that McCarthyism was successful not through a mass movement but the successful mobilization of a few supportive groups. According to Berkely professor Michael Paul Rogin '[McCarthy] did not mobilize

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    "We are [now] faced with exactly the same situation . . . Britain and France faced in 1938-39 with Hitler," Truman wrote. The Czech coup coincided with overwhelming approval of the Marshall Plan by the American Congress. Two weeks later, on March 5, General Lucius Clay sent his telegram from Germany warning of imminent war with Russia.

  2. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    UNTAG subsequently had the task of supervising an apparently non-contentious transition. Forces of SWAPO crossed the border from Angola on the day the cease-fire leading to the transition was due to come into effect, and were bloodily suppressed by South African forces with the consent of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General (UNSGSR)

  1. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    To Huntington it is these differences that will fuel the next wave of world conflict. Huntington argues, "Islamic fundamentalism is growing in the Middle East"(Huntington /1993:38) he warns that this will be the biggest threat to the West and claims "Islam has bloody boarders."

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    Is that really the meaning that lives in people's mind? In my opinion -and after questioning a few friends around me- civil would say that terrorism is a very dangerous, terrifying and sorrowful notion which is relatively new. But it's much more realistic than only notional.

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    especially those which either hold political, social or religious viewpoints in opposition of the super powers or have no economic or conventional connection with the super power will be involved in an abundance of conflicts that are very rarely resolved quickly.22 Due to these historic alliances and the United States'

  2. September 11th

    But what connection does Saddam Hussein have with global terrorism? The answer to this question lies with his hatred of America. This hatred stems from before the Gulf War when America openly funded the Israeli military. To the hard-line Islamic dictators like Hussein, the US's aid to Israel was emphasising America's Jewish links.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work