• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is Fascism a single doctrine?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is Fascism a single doctrine? As an ideology Fascism is a child of the twentieth century, which emerged out of a complex range of historical forces that were present in the period between the two world wars. Fascism was seen very much as a revolt against modernity, against the ideas and values of the Enlightenment and the political creeds that it spawned. It emerged most dramatically in Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy, yet fascist elements can also been detected in Portugal under the dictatorship of Salazar, in Spain under Franco and in Argentina under Peron. Indeed it can be said that the Fascism that emerged under Hitler and Mussolini shared many similarities, prompting the two to join forces during the Second World War. Nonetheless there are still some notable differences between the two doctrines suggesting that Fascism is not merely a single political concept. Many common themes can be detected in the Fascism of Hitler and Mussolini. In the first place, anti-rationalism is a uniting belief. Rejecting the ideas of the enlightenment, which based upon the ideas of reason, universal goodness and inevitable progress and a commitment to liberating human kind from the darkness of irrationalism and superstition, Fascists emphasised the emotion and intuition of humankind. ...read more.


Furthermore, both Nazis and Fascists are united in their anti-Capitalist and anti-Marxist nature. Fascism and Nazism found themselves at odds with Capitalism as they placed the community above the individual, reflected in the phrase "Common Good before Private Good" inscribed on the Nazi coin. Since Capitalism is based upon the pursuit of self-interest it thus threatens to undermine the cohesion of the nation. Fascists and Nazis believe that uniting workers and employers under the state could prevent class conflict. This was most vividly expressed in Mussolini's Corporate State. Similarly, Fascist and Nazis aimed to lure the working class away from Marxism, which preached the idea of an international working class, which again undermined the principles of national unity and integration. Finally, Fascism and Nazism are unique in their glorification of war and struggle. Indeed, Mussolini proclaimed that "war is to men what maternity is to women", while Hitler emphasised the need to go to war every 25 years. Subscribing to Social Darwinism, Fascists and Nazis regarded struggle as the natural and inevitable condition of both social and international life. Only competition and conflict could ensure human progress and guarantee that the fittest and strongest prosper in a process of elimination entitled the "survival of the fittest". ...read more.


Similarly, throughout Mussolini's regime, the Italian monarchy survived, many local politicians continued in power and the Catholic Church retained its privileges and independence. The Italian state thus operated more as a personalised dictatorship rather than a totalitarian dictatorship. Finally, Italian and German brands of Fascism differ in their attitudes towards modernism. While Mussolini was keen tom portray Italy as a modernising force and embrace the advantages of modern industry and technology, Hitler condemned modern civilisation as decadent and corrupt. In this way, he promoted the image of a peasant people suited to a simple existence. This peasant ideology had important implications for foreign policy-in order to restore the German people to their proper peasant existence, territorial expansion, "Lebensraum", was crucial. In conclusion, it can be said that Fascism ids a single coherent doctrine to a certain extent since both Nazism and Italian Fascism share many fundamental beliefs. The ideas of both helped to shape the doctrine of Fascism and had profound influences on other Fascist regimes both in Europe and abroad. Most notably, Franco's Spain and Vichy France drew many of their central beliefs from the regimes of Hitler and Mussolini. Yet, there are many significant differences and the two should be treated as separate doctrines owing to the profound clashes over areas such as race and the state. Tessa Jones 13.9 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Rise and Fall of Adolf Hitler.

    Poem in 1944 No, I cannot write the poem of war, Neither the colossal dying nor the local scene, A platoon asleep and dreaming of girls' warmth Or by the petrol-cooker scraping out a laughter. -- Only the images that are not even nightmare: A globe encrusted with a skin of seaweed, Or razors at the roots.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    They system of small individual farms gave way for class divisions; collectivisation would bring the peasant much closer to socialism. The peasants could farm enough grain to feed the cities, the yield surplus workers and still have enough to export to generate capital for industries - if they were moved into mechanised agriculture.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    German policies toward the Jews were standard in world history because societies always tend toward biological ethnic homogeneity and are therefore justified in removing alien forces. In this view, ethnic cleansing is a necessary measure in order to maintain public health and hygiene.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    However not all historians would agree with cult personalities as being a comparison. Thatcher argues that the cult status for Stalin could not be compared with Hitler because Hitler and Nazism were synonymous, Hitler was Nazism but Stalin was not soviet communism.

  1. Features of Fascism

    The early fascists were heralded for the ideas and parties, in which they opposed rather than for what they actually stood for. They seemed like a party of negativity rather than positivity. Historians today still struggle with the definition of fascism and the ever changing pattern of Mussolini's personal beliefs and political ideas only hinders this definition.

  2. Soviet State

    * Once it had broken the peasantry, the government could afford some modest, but significant, concessions. A crucial concession allowed the collective farm peasants to retain a small plot of land for their own private use and to sell the produce at free market prices.

  1. To what extent were the German and Italian regimes under Hitler and Mussolini Totalitarian?

    All these definitions above are essential in order to understand how totalitarianism is initially linked with Nazism and Fascism. These terms, Nazism Fascism and Totalitarianism have all got the subordination of the individual to the state and the control of mind etc.

  2. To What Extent Was a War Between Nazism and Bolshevism Inevitable?

    the sheer size of the territory to be occupied and more importantly consolidated after capture. Through speeches to the public and Reichstag, and private talks to official representatives of home and foreign concerns Hitler bred confusion over the relationship of Germany with Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work