• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it fair to describe the foreign policy of MacDonald and Baldwin as one of 'drift'?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is it fair to describe the foreign policy of MacDonald and Baldwin as one of 'drift'? The international context of MacDonald and Baldwin's Britain is important in assessing their competence. At a time when dictatorships and fascist rulings were becoming more popular, and consequently more threatening to global peace, MacDonald was seen as a 'spent force; whose lack of power left him incapable of opposing Hitler by the time he became aggressive,. Likewise, Baldwin was not a suitable politician to address the international threats. He did not show much interest in foreign affairs and preferred to 'preside over' rather than direct his cabinet. Foreign policy was seen as one of 'drift' because of the limited nature of Britain's involvement overseas. The forming of alliances is a central facet of foreign policy, and Britain's inability to form many strong connections was partly due to Baldwin's and MacDonald's poor judgement and decision-making skills. No resolute or coherent strategy was followed throughout the inter-war period. Fascist takeovers such as the invasions of Abyssinia and Manchuria, weakened the League considerably, and Britain's insubstantial reinforcement of the League's power made future conflict more likely as the threat of the League was severely reduced. ...read more.

Middle

Britain's pursuing of two contradictory policies (Pressurize Italy to accept sanctions whilst seeking a compromise solution) failed, revealing the British government as seemingly incompetent. The Spanish Civil War was treated by Britain with similar ambivalent, non-interventionist policies, chiefly the 'Gentleman's Agreement' which accepted status quo with Mussolini in 1937, helped make forming any future anti-fascist alliance difficult. Russia consequently became increasingly distrustful of France and Britain because of their failure to prevent German and Italian support for the Spanish Nationalists. The League of Nations was revealed as weak and useless - a legitimate Spanish government had been overthrown. The mutual suspicions between Russia, France and Britain made a anti-fascist front even more unlikely. Although throughout the 1920's, it was unclear how much of a threat Hitler was, by 1933, his elevation to Chancellor meant to most the dropping of German appeasement which had been previously justified as an attempt to support a democratic republic. However from 1933-35, the government showed little enthusiasm for active appeasement, despite Nazi foreign policies showing a certain moral flexibility, the brutality of the 'Night of the Long Knives' or the lack of pacific motivation behind the introduction of conscription or existence of the Luftwaffe for example. ...read more.

Conclusion

Complete reliance on peace-keeping of League of Nations, collective security through a series of regional alliances or appeasement. The League was seriously undermined by Britain's detached attitude and its consequent defeat in the Abyssinia and Manchuria crisis's. Alliances were seen by the public as one of the main reasons for WW1, and with the governments increasing reliance of the public's vote, they had to adopt a similar attitude in their policies. Also, alliances were uncoordinated and weak during the inter-war period, with double dealings (Naval Agreement) and surprising matches (Anti-Comintern Pact). SO despite being marked out as the main causes of WW2 and Hitler's ascension to Fuhrer, it seemed to be the only option left open to British politicians. Whether this is a result of an era of foreign 'drift' is debatable, however MacDonald and Baldwin's refusal to face some League-weakening conflicts, and the undertaking passive German appeasement does seem to out-weigh their measured actions, such as the disarmament talks and attempts at forming allies. The overall outcome of almost twenty years of this compromising foreign policy was grim, Britain had few allies, and faced three dictators - whose strength had grown due to British conciliation and isolation - with no US aid or reinforcement of a now shattered League. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    The short-term or 'trigger' causes were: i. The Wall Street crash on October 26th 1929 and the ensuing depression. ii. Hitler's ascension to power in 1933. iii. Japan and Italy turning openly aggressive as a result of the above. The Wall Street crash meant the collapse of the American economy and it's surrounding industry.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    They even let Italy use the Suez Canal to supply their army; they could have closed it which would probably have stopped the Italian invasion outright. Secretly Britain and France agreed a plan that they thought would bring the invasion to an end.

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    Britain and France finally became convinced of Hitler's expansionist objectives and announced their intention to defend the sovereignty of Poland. Because Hitler had concluded that he could not hope for British neutrality in the coming war, he formed a formal military alliance with Italy--the Pact of Steel.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    On the other hand, very few young Germans identified with Nazism; the vast majority supported the democratic way of life. The truth is that most Germans surely wanted to get along with their lives in a resurgent economy, unburdened by the weight of historical crimes.

  1. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    For Disraeli, Gladstone used his religion to mask his true intentions - to appear pious while actually manipulating and manoeuvring his way through politics. Perhaps it is Disraeli's emphasis on ridiculing Gladstone's religious beliefs that has inspired the concept that he was first and foremost a highly religious man.

  2. britaina nd disarmament

    Whilst the agreement itself (the guarantee of borders) was far from earth-shattering, the so-called Locarno Spirit which was imbued upon the years after the treaty was highly significant. At the time, it was felt that the Locarno Spirit was the 'dawn in new international relations,' in which war would become extinct.

  1. Can historical parallels be drawn between democracies and dictatorships?

    Once in power, like all other dictators, he quickly disposed of all conspirators and domestic enemies by ordering their execution. This one of the characteristic that is seen in all dictators.

  2. "An Honourable Policy Pursued by Honourable Men"-Is This a Fair Assessment of the Policy ...

    Chamberlain put his faith in someone he knew, Lord Halifax, to partake in diplomatic talks with Hitler in Germany instead of Eden. Although this was undermining Eden, it could be argued that without full support, a government is essentially weak.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work