• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it fair to describe the foreign policy of MacDonald and Baldwin as one of 'drift'?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is it fair to describe the foreign policy of MacDonald and Baldwin as one of 'drift'? The international context of MacDonald and Baldwin's Britain is important in assessing their competence. At a time when dictatorships and fascist rulings were becoming more popular, and consequently more threatening to global peace, MacDonald was seen as a 'spent force; whose lack of power left him incapable of opposing Hitler by the time he became aggressive,. Likewise, Baldwin was not a suitable politician to address the international threats. He did not show much interest in foreign affairs and preferred to 'preside over' rather than direct his cabinet. Foreign policy was seen as one of 'drift' because of the limited nature of Britain's involvement overseas. The forming of alliances is a central facet of foreign policy, and Britain's inability to form many strong connections was partly due to Baldwin's and MacDonald's poor judgement and decision-making skills. No resolute or coherent strategy was followed throughout the inter-war period. Fascist takeovers such as the invasions of Abyssinia and Manchuria, weakened the League considerably, and Britain's insubstantial reinforcement of the League's power made future conflict more likely as the threat of the League was severely reduced. ...read more.

Middle

Britain's pursuing of two contradictory policies (Pressurize Italy to accept sanctions whilst seeking a compromise solution) failed, revealing the British government as seemingly incompetent. The Spanish Civil War was treated by Britain with similar ambivalent, non-interventionist policies, chiefly the 'Gentleman's Agreement' which accepted status quo with Mussolini in 1937, helped make forming any future anti-fascist alliance difficult. Russia consequently became increasingly distrustful of France and Britain because of their failure to prevent German and Italian support for the Spanish Nationalists. The League of Nations was revealed as weak and useless - a legitimate Spanish government had been overthrown. The mutual suspicions between Russia, France and Britain made a anti-fascist front even more unlikely. Although throughout the 1920's, it was unclear how much of a threat Hitler was, by 1933, his elevation to Chancellor meant to most the dropping of German appeasement which had been previously justified as an attempt to support a democratic republic. However from 1933-35, the government showed little enthusiasm for active appeasement, despite Nazi foreign policies showing a certain moral flexibility, the brutality of the 'Night of the Long Knives' or the lack of pacific motivation behind the introduction of conscription or existence of the Luftwaffe for example. ...read more.

Conclusion

Complete reliance on peace-keeping of League of Nations, collective security through a series of regional alliances or appeasement. The League was seriously undermined by Britain's detached attitude and its consequent defeat in the Abyssinia and Manchuria crisis's. Alliances were seen by the public as one of the main reasons for WW1, and with the governments increasing reliance of the public's vote, they had to adopt a similar attitude in their policies. Also, alliances were uncoordinated and weak during the inter-war period, with double dealings (Naval Agreement) and surprising matches (Anti-Comintern Pact). SO despite being marked out as the main causes of WW2 and Hitler's ascension to Fuhrer, it seemed to be the only option left open to British politicians. Whether this is a result of an era of foreign 'drift' is debatable, however MacDonald and Baldwin's refusal to face some League-weakening conflicts, and the undertaking passive German appeasement does seem to out-weigh their measured actions, such as the disarmament talks and attempts at forming allies. The overall outcome of almost twenty years of this compromising foreign policy was grim, Britain had few allies, and faced three dictators - whose strength had grown due to British conciliation and isolation - with no US aid or reinforcement of a now shattered League. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Moral force and collective security would never have worked because there was not sufficient trust between member states. The absence of disarmament meant that there were still weapons with which aggressive manoeuvres could be made. The non-formation of a collective military force was the physical embodiment of non-commitment to the upkeep of international peace and security.

  2. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    However, the general consensus is that Gladstone's Evangelical upbringing led to a strong sense of religious morality that could be said to have permeated all aspects of his life, including his politics. In modern Britain it would rarely be expected for a Prime Minister to admit to religion colouring their policies: as Alastair Campbell famously declared, 'we don't do God'.

  1. Was appeasement justified?

    Graph three - Compares the aircraft production of Germany and Britain, 1936-1939. In the 1930s, aircraft were generally seen as the most important weapon. It was assumed that bombing raids on cities were virtually impossible to stop. As you can see by looking at the graphs the armaments build-up in the 1930s.

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Not surprisingly the one vote against any action being taken against Japan came from, Japan. They were one of the permanent members of the council and had the power of the veto making the vote null and void. Smarting from the insult Japan resigned from the League on the 27th

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    Czechoslovakia consisted of numerous ethic minorities above all Germans. The German's heard "...the call of nationalism" and saw there united Germany growing powerful and united over there boarders. Taylor believes Hitler didn't create this movement it merely grew stronger as Germany grew stronger. Hitler introduced foreign policies that in essence supported the leaders of the German faction in Czechoslovakia.

  2. Was appeasement the only option open to Britain in 1938-1939?

    It seemed to many at the time that the culmination of the expansion of Prussia would be the Great War of 1914-19 however this was only to set up Europe for the second world war as the great powers of Europe, centred their foreign policies around avoiding a repeat of the catastrophic loss of life of the 1st world war.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Abyssinia would be split up with Italy getting the fertile lands and a large area to the south would be reserved for Italian economic advancement. Neither Italy nor Abyssinia was involved in these "talks". These "talks" were then leaked to the press.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Italy gaining another African colony of its own as both Britain and France had colonies of their own. Then when Italy did try to gain these colonies Britain spoke out and warned them against it. Sir Samuel Hoare made a speech to the league calling for "collective resistance to any Italian aggression".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work