• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To what extent is it fair to say Europe "Stumbled" into a war in 1914?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

31-December-2002 Historical Essay Assignment Roham Gharegozlou, 1oIB Historical Essay Assignment 1. "To what extent is it fair to say Europe "Stumbled" into a war in 1914?" Language: English Subject: History Instructor: Mme Therrode Institution: EABJM The so-called 'great war' of 1914-1918, also referred to as the First World War, came about through a complicated and amalgamated mass of different causes. There are those who now contend that the war was indeed inevitable, and yet others who maintain that it came about through a mere stroke of luck, or rather, misfortune. What the question put forward now is, whether or not the European powers, in 1914, actually "stumbled" into war. This would mean that the war was indeed an 'accident', brought about by ineffectual diplomacy and inept political governance. Undoubtedly the war's causes were deep-rooted, going back to the times of Otto Von Bismarck and the unification of Germany itself. One often-cited 'cause' of the War is the alliance system initiated by Bismarck: many assert that this divided the European Powers into two armed camps (that of France, Russia, and perhaps Britain, against that of Germany, Austria, and perhaps Italy), something that actually made war inevitable. ...read more.

Middle

Britain, intent on keeping a gigantic lead over its next 'competitor' in terms of sea-power, felt threatened by the Kaiser's Weltpolitik, or World Policy, which necessitated a large naval presence for Germany. It was perhaps this that really pushed Britain and made her firmly entrenched in the Entente camp of powers, but it hardly made a war necessary. Almost the same thing could be said about the arms race, in which the different powers were competing to amass the largest and most effective offensive arsenal. Having such an arsenal would not necessitate war, however: as demonstrated by the Cold War, an arms race does not unavoidably lead to conflict. It can in fact be used as a deterrent. Nevertheless, one must take into account that first of all, the only way a country could learn about another's military capability was through mainly spying. And if there was a lack of information, countries might get over-confident, and perhaps feel more ready to spark a conflict. This scenario actually came to pass in the First World War, with each country so confident in its own prowess that many thought the war was going to be over 'by Christmas'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet right afterwards, he tried to re-instate his order of partial mobilization again after hearing Germany was trying to restrain its ally. Indeed she was, but Russia's actions forced her to make a response, she sent an ultimatum to Russia demanding the retraction of Russian troops from the German border, an order which proved impossible, and so Germany was forced to declare war on Russia, bringing in France and later Britain as well. In view of all this evidence and opinion, it must be said that beyond a shadow of a doubt most major powers did not anticipate war before the July crisis in 1914 following the assassination of Franz-Ferdinand. However, it is possible to discern a train of thought in the minds of German diplomats especially that war would be beneficial, perhaps hinting that they were taking steps to ensure its coming-about. At first, no-one in Europe expected that such a local conflict would escalate into a Europe- and then a world- wide war. However, after the initial 'stumbling', so to speak, Germany especially pushed for war, rejecting peace attempts and guaranteeing the outbreak of war. Europe as a whole did 'stumble' into war, at least in its primary stages. But nevertheless there were people who prepared for it, and took advantage of its possibility when it came about. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    This is the opposite of what is said in the first source by Haig. Private George Coppard also says, 'The Germans must have been reinforcing the wire for month'; this shows that the Germans had been preparing for war, unlike the British.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    He was not allowed to attend official functions with his wife, unless he was in military uniform. * Waiting for Franz Ferdinand were seven members of the Black Hand Gang, Serbian students who were determined to kill him. * The eldest was Nedjelko Cabrinovic, who was carrying a bomb was carrying a bomb.

  1. Why Was The Great War Not Over By Christmas 1914?

    This meant that trench warfare lasted for a long time as neither side could advance, as if they had risen above ground level then they would have unmistakably been shot. Also, this meant that the Germans had a much more superior trench network system and underground mines because they didn't

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    States" because it would help keep Americans at work producing goods needed by the Russians. Just as important, it would provide "one of the most effective weapons to avoid the development of a sphere of influence of the Soviet Union over eastern Europe and the Balkans."

  1. "The nations of Europe stumbled into war by Aug 1914" Do you agree?

    Despite the Crimean War of the 1850's, there was still considerable concern for the Balkans in the light of the continuing decline of the Ottoman Empire. The Russo- Turkish War of 1878, which Russia won and gained control of the Straits showed that it was a considerable military power, while it showed the opposite about Turkey.

  2. American History.

    Southern leaders, who responded by convincing the 1844 Democratic convention to use a new rule - if candidate not chose by 2/3 of convention he's out. This blocked Van Buren as the nominee and led to the selection of James K.

  1. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    Hence, the direct result of Khrushchev's speech was that relations with the US and the West were eased. On the other hand, it also led to the events in Poland and Hungary in October 1956, both of which resulted in heightened tension between East and West.

  2. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    And that in unison, Soviets and Revisionists cry that the workers really "confronted the tsarist regime with a challenge it could not withstand" (Acton). The politicisation of the workforce was now apparent, and the Revisionists showed that workers tended to side with socialists in the DUMA elections and Trade Union Boards (as Soviets rightly claim)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work