• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it true to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is it true to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail? A country that wishes to be in the forefront of modernization cannot survive without a strong, fruitful economy. In the 1920's the leading powers went into economic depression and nearly collapsed. However: a decade later single party leaders such as Stalin and Hitler took a firm hold on their economically stricken countries and raised them to great heights. Yet as quickly as it (the economy) is raised it can also just as quickly fall into shambles. In the 1930's there was a certain man by the name of Adolf Hitler. His potential as a powerful leader was immediately noticed and he slowly gained power until finally (through elections) becoming supreme leader of Germany through the creation of his infamous workers party the Nazi's. The Nazi party at this point in time had an enormous affect on the German people. ...read more.

Middle

But not even that was working because while "rearming", natural resources where running low and Hitler did not want the people of Germany to ration. (This was done by Hitler so that the people of Germany did not think that there country was in need of something) So Hitler had only one solution invade the Rhineland "because he know it would be extraordinarily popular within Germany and divert the publics attention from his domestic difficulties2" Roberts comments that "there are 34 vital materials without which a nation cannot live, and unfortunately, Germany is the worst off it has only two in ample quantities-potash and coal.2" Hitler's solution to this problem was war, as well as throughout the war maintain his four year plan. However as the war reached it's end in 1944 "it was obvious 'to all but fanatics [that] the war was economically lost'. Allied bombing had reduced oil supplies to a dangerously low level and disrupted transport facilities throughout the Reich, thereby dislocating the supply of coal, ...read more.

Conclusion

These goals were an almost impossible task yet factories achieved them, even if it meant sometimes cheating on the actual numbers. Yet if you didn't achieve the allocated goal or "target" or if you didn't show up for work you would be punished and sent off to the Gulags. All of these hard goals allowed for Russia's economy to boom when the others were in shambles. A strong economy is an essential playing ground for separating the seemingly strong country from a weak one. Yet to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail is a too broad of a statement. Germany although seemingly strong on the outside was very weak and corrupt inside, Yet Russia which was seemingly weak on the outside was strong in the inside. 1 Nazi Economics Reason Online magazine August/September 1999 2 Roberts Stephens The House that Hitler Built 3 Reich Marks-German Currency 4 Williamson D.G. The Third Reich Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Inc.,New York. 5 Joseph Stalin expressing his goal for Russia/5 year plan ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    This states to me that Hitler was obviously very bad at making decisions, yet even when he did, It was in some what a way of propaganda when it is sent off as "Order of the Furher". Looking at another source, I find more substantial evidence.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    These Nazi officeholders presented a taste of what national rule would be like. They politicized all aspects of life under their control. In the state of Anhalt, they expelled the Bauhaus School of Design from Dessau because of its modern approach to architecture.

  1. "Italy Unified Itself". To what extent is this statement true?

    The pope had an important impact on Garibaldi, who became famous as a result of the revolutions. The kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia was the focal point for unification of the Italian Nation. After 1848, Piedmont maintained its independence, constitution and freedom of the press - which led to it becoming fertile

  2. Formarion of the Nazi Party.

    As a teenager Hitler took part in a boys choir, at a church which was decorated with swastikas. Hitler would have seen these swastikas regularly, so they would have stuck in his mind, this could be why he used it as the official symbol of the Nazi party.

  1. To what extent is it true to say that the great powers were more ...

    Similarly, Prussia had always been interested to annex the neighboring German state, Saxony. Yet, she only got 2/5 of Saxony in the end since an equilibrium of power had to be established so as to safeguard peace. As for Austria, she also made compromise when she agreed to the dual leadership system with Prussia in the German Confederation.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    propaganda films such as Join the Collective Farm - one man loses a horse, another breaks his plough, a third has no seeds. Pitching in together, they fulfil their needs by collectivisation.18 However, in reality, there was great hostility between the peasants and the kolkhoz (collective farm)

  1. Did the Nazi arms economy make war an economic necessity?

    The `December Programme' focused on limited rearmament: developing a relatively small army for defensive purposes, rebuilding the post-Versailles military structures, and developing a body of trained personnel [9]. This limited rearmament reflects the weakness of Germany on the international stage at this juncture.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Only those who promoted Socialist Realism could practice their craft. 8. Writers had to write about themes relating to party concerns like industrialisation. 9. Cheap books produced in bulk to ensure the population became increasingly more literate. In 1931, Stalin declared the Cultural Revolution had come to an end.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work