• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it true to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is it true to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail? A country that wishes to be in the forefront of modernization cannot survive without a strong, fruitful economy. In the 1920's the leading powers went into economic depression and nearly collapsed. However: a decade later single party leaders such as Stalin and Hitler took a firm hold on their economically stricken countries and raised them to great heights. Yet as quickly as it (the economy) is raised it can also just as quickly fall into shambles. In the 1930's there was a certain man by the name of Adolf Hitler. His potential as a powerful leader was immediately noticed and he slowly gained power until finally (through elections) becoming supreme leader of Germany through the creation of his infamous workers party the Nazi's. The Nazi party at this point in time had an enormous affect on the German people. ...read more.

Middle

But not even that was working because while "rearming", natural resources where running low and Hitler did not want the people of Germany to ration. (This was done by Hitler so that the people of Germany did not think that there country was in need of something) So Hitler had only one solution invade the Rhineland "because he know it would be extraordinarily popular within Germany and divert the publics attention from his domestic difficulties2" Roberts comments that "there are 34 vital materials without which a nation cannot live, and unfortunately, Germany is the worst off it has only two in ample quantities-potash and coal.2" Hitler's solution to this problem was war, as well as throughout the war maintain his four year plan. However as the war reached it's end in 1944 "it was obvious 'to all but fanatics [that] the war was economically lost'. Allied bombing had reduced oil supplies to a dangerously low level and disrupted transport facilities throughout the Reich, thereby dislocating the supply of coal, ...read more.

Conclusion

These goals were an almost impossible task yet factories achieved them, even if it meant sometimes cheating on the actual numbers. Yet if you didn't achieve the allocated goal or "target" or if you didn't show up for work you would be punished and sent off to the Gulags. All of these hard goals allowed for Russia's economy to boom when the others were in shambles. A strong economy is an essential playing ground for separating the seemingly strong country from a weak one. Yet to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail is a too broad of a statement. Germany although seemingly strong on the outside was very weak and corrupt inside, Yet Russia which was seemingly weak on the outside was strong in the inside. 1 Nazi Economics Reason Online magazine August/September 1999 2 Roberts Stephens The House that Hitler Built 3 Reich Marks-German Currency 4 Williamson D.G. The Third Reich Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Inc.,New York. 5 Joseph Stalin expressing his goal for Russia/5 year plan ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    It was said that he was not given a ministerial rank, however evidence would suggest that Himmler did not care about this rank or even bother of trying to require it. Brozart explains, "Supplementary decrees made it clear that his subordination to Frick was more or less purely nominal"14This can

  2. Hitlers Germany

    After the war, military specialists of many nations worked on improving the armor, range, and speed of tanks and airplanes and sought new methods for their use. But it was German soldiers, scientists, and engineers who thought about and experimented with tanks and airplanes most consistently.

  1. To what extent is it true to say that the great powers were more ...

    Similarly, Prussia had always been interested to annex the neighboring German state, Saxony. Yet, she only got 2/5 of Saxony in the end since an equilibrium of power had to be established so as to safeguard peace. As for Austria, she also made compromise when she agreed to the dual leadership system with Prussia in the German Confederation.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    It gathered a momentum of its own, and like the Nazi state, there was more information than the government could deal with. Ironically, perceived inequality between family and neighbours, led to these denouncements. Although the regime claimed that socialism had in the main been achieved and exploiting classes eliminated, the state did not wither away as Communist theory implied.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    we are allowed to govern, or we will seize power by marching on Rome [to] take by the throat the miserable political class that govern us"10. This shows that he was constantly aware of the thoughts and feelings both within his party and the politicians and influential figures holding the power in Italy.

  2. WHY DID THE KULTURKAMF FAIL

    limited church powers, and in 1875 the state mandated civil marriage services. This didn't look good in the eyes of not only the Catholics but also some protestants as they believed it violated civil rights, and if anything freedom of conscience.

  1. Formarion of the Nazi Party.

    Hitler originally became involved with the DAP, as he was an undercover spy with the army. He was sent into the DAP meeting to investigate, as the army were keeping an eye on both Marxists and nationalists fearing an uprising.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Education: After the revolution, there had been a great experiment with education. More active learning styles were promoted and children were often encouraged to do more socially useful work. During the Cultural Revolution, Stalin changed this. There were problems ï teachers were untrained and not communists therefore did not like nor approve of the new syllabus.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work