• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it true to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is it true to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail? A country that wishes to be in the forefront of modernization cannot survive without a strong, fruitful economy. In the 1920's the leading powers went into economic depression and nearly collapsed. However: a decade later single party leaders such as Stalin and Hitler took a firm hold on their economically stricken countries and raised them to great heights. Yet as quickly as it (the economy) is raised it can also just as quickly fall into shambles. In the 1930's there was a certain man by the name of Adolf Hitler. His potential as a powerful leader was immediately noticed and he slowly gained power until finally (through elections) becoming supreme leader of Germany through the creation of his infamous workers party the Nazi's. The Nazi party at this point in time had an enormous affect on the German people. ...read more.

Middle

But not even that was working because while "rearming", natural resources where running low and Hitler did not want the people of Germany to ration. (This was done by Hitler so that the people of Germany did not think that there country was in need of something) So Hitler had only one solution invade the Rhineland "because he know it would be extraordinarily popular within Germany and divert the publics attention from his domestic difficulties2" Roberts comments that "there are 34 vital materials without which a nation cannot live, and unfortunately, Germany is the worst off it has only two in ample quantities-potash and coal.2" Hitler's solution to this problem was war, as well as throughout the war maintain his four year plan. However as the war reached it's end in 1944 "it was obvious 'to all but fanatics [that] the war was economically lost'. Allied bombing had reduced oil supplies to a dangerously low level and disrupted transport facilities throughout the Reich, thereby dislocating the supply of coal, ...read more.

Conclusion

These goals were an almost impossible task yet factories achieved them, even if it meant sometimes cheating on the actual numbers. Yet if you didn't achieve the allocated goal or "target" or if you didn't show up for work you would be punished and sent off to the Gulags. All of these hard goals allowed for Russia's economy to boom when the others were in shambles. A strong economy is an essential playing ground for separating the seemingly strong country from a weak one. Yet to say that single party states usually try to control the national economy but always fail is a too broad of a statement. Germany although seemingly strong on the outside was very weak and corrupt inside, Yet Russia which was seemingly weak on the outside was strong in the inside. 1 Nazi Economics Reason Online magazine August/September 1999 2 Roberts Stephens The House that Hitler Built 3 Reich Marks-German Currency 4 Williamson D.G. The Third Reich Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Inc.,New York. 5 Joseph Stalin expressing his goal for Russia/5 year plan ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    that gave him emergency powers for him, as the head of the German Police and the Reich SS Leader. However, with this power give come with it drawbacks. "Within the Reich Ministry of the Interior"13, was used under Himmler's power which meant that technically Frick was a higher rank as

  2. Hitlers Germany

    that their new opponents-who were likely to be their old ones-must be overwhelmed by a Blitzkrieg, before they could bring their superior economic and manpower potential to bear again. In searching for weapons and tactics with which they could carry out a swift war of movement, the German strategists fastened onto the tank and the airplane.

  1. To what extent is it true to say that the great powers were more ...

    Similarly, Prussia had always been interested to annex the neighboring German state, Saxony. Yet, she only got 2/5 of Saxony in the end since an equilibrium of power had to be established so as to safeguard peace. As for Austria, she also made compromise when she agreed to the dual leadership system with Prussia in the German Confederation.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    In order to fulfil quotas, propaganda was used by the media to encourage ordinary people to criticise anyone from the party officials to the workers. This was almost too successful; there was a flood of denunciations for "dubious class origins, long-forgotten sins, and current misdeeds"52.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    He knew how to manipulate people and how to keep them on side to use to his advantage. These arrangements were given the appearance of military operation in order to heighten tension and keep the extremes of the party on side.

  2. WHY DID THE KULTURKAMF FAIL

    limited church powers, and in 1875 the state mandated civil marriage services. This didn't look good in the eyes of not only the Catholics but also some protestants as they believed it violated civil rights, and if anything freedom of conscience.

  1. Formarion of the Nazi Party.

    Whilst there Hitler strongly disagreed with statements made in a speech, so got up and began speaking strongly against it, stunning everyone in the room, after this the DAP founder Anton Drexler approached Hitler urging him to return to another meeting. Upon returning Hitler becomes the party's fifty fifth member.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Social inequality ï men did not have to give much notice to divorce their wives. Most divorced women ended up unemployed or dependant on their ex-husband. However, Soviet propaganda painted a very different picture. It depicted the ideal Soviet woman ï should be proudly independent and should reject bourgeois concepts like worrying about appearance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work