• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent to Prussia dominate Germany.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent to Prussia dominate Germany Germany in 1862 under a dominant Prussia was the culmination of many inter-related factors, Prussia had obtained in this arena was no accident. By playing with German Nationalism, Prussian Economic Power, War, the international situation and the failures of the Austrian State Bismark had managed to guide Germany into an overwhelming position of power. Prussia had extended trading links with virtually all of Germany by 1834 but by increasing the economic ties of Germany with Prussia, Prussia had also increased the need for Prussian backing upon those states with which they traded. Prussia's industrial strength rocketed through the huge market for its goods, thus allowing continual reinvestment in further development. This impacted the way in which Prussia fought wars. By having more railways, more efficient cannons and having the access to unrivalled resources, it was ready to fight the new breed of industrial war. Its logistics helped mobilization and supply, and helped to achieve the short, decisive victories it won. ...read more.

Middle

Thus it was ready for defeat in war. However, he now only had half of Germany inside the new Prussian borders. To persuade the remainder to join him, Bismark would have to evoke nationalism on his side. Bismarck's astute manipulation of this feeling was a crucial element in overcoming the south's dislike of Protestant Prussia. However, by evoking the memories of the crushing Napoleonic victories at Austerlitz and Ulm the strong anti-francophone sentiment was reawakened. The public were now in favour of unification under Prussian rule. Due to the steady growth of literacy due to the Protestant religion, industrialisation and through the enlightenment, many of the Romantic Movement's key ideas were being lapped up by eager Germans. The massive growth of the Railways in Germany, which by 1860 had reached the dizzying heights of 1163kmiii, only helped to spread these Nationalistic ideas. Thus with French hatred whipped up to a frenzy, all that the Prussian's needed to extend their influence was a war. Again by manipulating international affairs, Bismarck secured this. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bismarck' successful diplomacy and use of skills helped to extend Prussian power no end. His skills lay in his manipulation of public opinion. The use of short, successful wars such as in 1864 (with Denmark) and in 1866 (with Austria) helped to increase Prussian popularity. His careful use of the Schleswig-Holstein incident also helped his eventual aims. Diplomacy in the fields of war and enlargement were influential. By binding stated to Prussia using the Zollparlament, the Zollverein and the army, he increased the likelihood of unification under Prussian rule. His use of nationalism also was important to this end. As has been previously outlined, his use of foreign powers around wartime was also influential. We are shown this during the defeat of Austria, where he sought " to reserve the possibility of becoming friends" so that "she would [not] become the ally of France and of every opponent of ours. "iv So, in conclusion we can see the expansion of Prussian power being as a result of many things. The role of economics, diplomacy, nationalism, Bismarck, the international situation and war all played integral parts in the eventual establishment of the second German Reich in 1871. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * However it was not only perceived 'enemies of the Soviet Union' that suffered at the hands of Stalin. Purging was the means by which he ruled and this also applied to those closest to him. * After the war the wife of Molotov, the Foreign Minister, was arrested and

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    What legacy however, does Bismarck's work and character leave behind? The character of Bismarck clearly helped form the Germany of the beginning of the twentieth century, but how much of this was purely Bismarck and purely Prussia is open to debate.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    When they had been defeated and withdrawn from southern Norway (although troops remained in Narvik a month longer), public opinion finally forced Chamberlain from office. On May 10 Winston Churchill became British prime minister, heading a coalition government including Labor.

  2. The attitude of the Austrian and Prussia government towards the Unification of Germany

    One of these Conservatives was Schwarzenberg, he was devoted to the interests of Habsburg Austria and as chief minister he had the authority to promote Austria's interest in the Bund. By the nature of conservatism it means that someone does not want change, this is true about the Austrian government

  1. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    had the potential to drive the Italians for the next 20 years. On the other hand the Germans did not have a solid government but, just utter chaos. It was soon to come though under Stresemann's regime, yet it only lasted up until 1929, which meant that the Golden stance

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    These southern German states were monarchies but there were large liberal movements, both monarchist and liberals resented uniting with the north evidence is the Progressive Party firmly opposed unification and they did have some positions of influence. If there was a war between France and Prussia then they would side

  1. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    placed wanted more power but refused to fight for it, so in the period 1848-62 nothing critically changed. Bismarck, Von Roon and William I are the real forces of change in central Europe, with there ascendancy to power a new era in Prussian history begins.

  2. To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany an entrenched authoritarian state?

    the extent their authoritarian rule, which is does appear they had, is the extent to which it was really ?entrenched?. An example from a much later period can be taken to show that this was the case. Under the constitution of the Weimar Republic, the judiciary were given independence, which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work