• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was a War Between Nazism and Bolshevism Inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Was a War Between Nazism and Bolshevism Inevitable? Introduction: From his entry into politics Hitler was committed to a war in the East. He subscribed to the pan-German philosophy and was a staunch believer in the idea of eastern expansion emulating the great German Reich of the Wilhelmine era1. Hitler's personal preoccupation with Lebensraum echoes back to the pre-war thinking of the anti-Semitic right wings, and the general need for expansion felt after the vast confiscations of the Treaty of Versailles. As early as 1924/5, when he was serving a prison sentence at Landsberg Am Lech, Hitler was thinking of the time when the NSDAP would carry Germany to victory in the east. However as Hitler said himself at the time "the result would be inevitable defeat"; but this was taking into account the shrunken economy and military of the unstable Weimar government. Thereafter Hitler's discussions on the matter of realising ideology, in Mein Kampf and when in power, came down to the necessity of an invasion of Russia; "Destiny itself seems to wish to point the way for us here"2 he wrote in 1925 at Landsberg. Thus it seems that ideologically Hitler was confirmed in the fact that war with Russia was unavoidable, and indeed he did not wish to avoid it. Yet the F�hrer also knew of the benefits to Germany, materially and politically, these were probably the most important reasons for an attack on Russia but by no means the only ones. The German war effort would require huge amounts of raw materials and food, Russia could provide this; since the British and French appeased his policy of annexation and absorption in the east Hitler was encouraged to go further, by attacking Poland he forced the allies' hand and realised the unease between them and Russia. Despite their common enemy the enmity between the Russians and the western allies was obvious and Hitler capitalised on it in the end. ...read more.

Middle

Despite all the ideological causes of the Russian war, the fact still remains that the German premier decided to ally Germany with an, ideologically speaking, inferior country for political expediency, and, to a certain extent, desperation (since Britain refused to join the Germans). Hitler then went on to break the alliance, rather hypocritically given his previous analysis of Russian policy making "The present rulers of Russia have no idea of honourably entering into an alliance, let alone observing one."11 So the opening of Nazi-Soviet relations began in the late 1930's, Hitler having decided that an eastern alliance could benefit Germany by guaranteeing his eastern flank safe whilst the Fatherland's armies prepared to march into France, gaining half of Poland and the upper hand on mobilisation once Britain and France decided to act. Underlying the ruse of ideological reasoning was Hitler's knowledge that Russia was a rich source of raw materials; a good area for the mass colonisation and sprawl of the German people after the war was won. Although Lebensraum in the east was put across as an ideological concept for the Aryan warrior/farmer, (Blut und Boden) the crux of the wish for expansion into soviet lands was the gain in space. Hitler was desperate for a close empire of Germans to be powerful enough to challenge France and Great Britain, yet which was not spread across the globe like the British, or populated by inferiors and non nationals like that of the French in Africa. As early as 31st July 1940 Hitler was planning that a campaign against Russia would last for around 5 weeks. The motivation for this was mostly diplomatic12, Britain was holding resolutely strong and the Russian patience with German misdemeanours in Poland and Finland was wearing thin; Hitler sought to bring Britain to her knees by removing the eastern hope of the empire. The Russians were unperturbed at this time by Japanese proximity and Hitler began to fear soviet plans for expansion especially towards the Rumanian oilfields; hence the economic and political threat posed by the soviets was enough to ensure German plans and possible pre-emptive action. ...read more.

Conclusion

The F�hrer had originally planned for a war of ten to fifteen years, picking off the major powers from his base of western Europe, Overy suggests that the Reich from France and Scandinavia to the Polish and Czech regions would have constituted Hitler's new Nazi homeland from where he would take out almost at leisure the powers of Britain, the USA and the USSR15. However once general war broke out in 1939 war with Russia became unavoidable because Hitler had not the time to pick his enemies. Yet despite all the motives for war the one single factor, which must dominate over all the others, was Hitler's very own views, thoughts and methods of conveying them. Kershaw puts it most clearly in his biography of Hitler: "Economic, military, strategic and ideological motives were not separable in Hitler's thinking on the Soviet Union. They blended together, and were used by him with different strength at different times in persuading those in his company of the correctness and inevitability in his course of action."16 Showing that the standard of evidence, depth of analysis and quality of evaluation of any historian's account of Hitler and the war with Russia must take into account that the man's strength of mind and character would prevail over virtually any outside factor. Overall then, it is easy to see German requirements for war with Russia, indeed ideology was an important factor, yet inevitability was ensured by the ambition inherent in Hitler's dictatorship. Bibliography Noakes J & Pridham G (Ed.) Nazism 1919-45 Vol.3 (University of Exeter Press, Exeter, 1997) Kershaw I The Nazi Dictatorship Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation (Edward Arnold, London, 1989) Hildebrand K The Third Reich (George Allen & Unwin, London, 1984) Bullock A Hitler and Stalin Parallel Lives (Harper Collins, London, 1991) Kershaw I Hitler - 1936-1945 Nemesis (Penguin, London, 2001) Geary R Hitler and Nazism (Routledge, London, 1997) Hitler A (Trans. Manheim R) Mein Kampf (Hutchinson & Co, London, 1974) Overy R War and Economy in the Third Reich (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994) Words (Not inc. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    and Pudovkin were ostracised and the composers Shostakovich and Prokofiev attacked in February 1948 for writing elitist and 'non Russian' music. * The post war era was one of state sponsored xenophobia and Russian chauvinism, even after Zhdanov's death in 1948, all forms of art and culture considered to be anti-Russian were denounced.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    This resulted again in the historical comparison remaining limited until the 1990s. It wasn't until the collapse of the Soviet Union when Historians once again began to take interest in the topic. This is due to the true extent of the crimes committed by Stalin being revealed when access to documents became public in the 1980s.

  1. Operation Barbarossa - Causes and Consequences

    Before the invasion took place, Stalin was warned many times of Hitler's true intentions. However, he preferred to trust his 'political instinct' rather than the secret reports he had been receiving for weeks. Convinced he had signed an eternal pact of friendship with Germany, he paid no attention to the evidence of Hitler's treachery his intelligence constantly presented to him.

  2. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    In March 1935, Hitler transformed the Labor Service into a compulsory military service. Also, the Nazis leaders employed a more forceful propaganda against the gainful employment of women. As Hitler gave out more and more rearmament and construction programs in order to achieve Autarky, more jobs were created.

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    This shows how great as an opposing force towards Hitler they were. The Christian and Protestant churches were the major churches in Germany. Hitler saw their ideology as contradictive with the Nazi one. So he used several tactics in order to eliminate them.

  2. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    Therefore they used it, alongside the forcefulness of the Gestapo (Nazi secret police), to help eliminate opposition influence and enforce their own. Moreover, several departments for the Reich Chamber of Culture were created, which took the responsibility of deciding who could work in these areas, practically eradicating the need for censorship.

  1. To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between ...

    all out war.15 Also A.J.P Taylor writes only ten years after the end of the Second World War, as the first chief revisionist, when the majority of countries especially within Europe were suspicious of German nationalism, so he is bound to discredit a leading patriotic figure of national pride.

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    this policy and that he was only pressurised by others such as Halifax and Churchill to guarantee Poland?s borders and subsequently declare war on Germany in 1939. Chamberlain according Charmley should have followed appeasement through to its logical conclusion. This would have ultimately given Germany a free hand in Eastern Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work