• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Britains foreign policy determined by fear of attacks on the Empire 1878-1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Britain?s foreign policy by fear of attacks on the Empire 1878-1914? The underlying motive was always fear of attacks on the empire and the loss of wealth and status that would inevitably follow. Though in the short term it seemed to be concerns over the rise of Germany that determined the actions of Salisbury and especially Grey even here it was the need to ensure that Germany never enjoyed the European domination which could lead her to challenge Britain?s domination of World trade that was significant. There was never a threat of direct attack on Britain?s empire, but there was the fear that the expansion of France, Russia and then Germany would bring them too close. Britain?s dominant position was established at the Congress of Berlin. The reason why Britain stepped in to demand reform of the Treaty of San Stefano was to break the hold Russia ...read more.

Middle

the Middle and Far East; Germany after 1900, with the Berlin-Baghdad railway and territory in Africa, was a threat in both areas. It was the desire to protect the delicate balance of power between these two alliances that kept Salisbury out of either of these alliances though at this stage in the 1880s both sides wanted Britain to join them since this might give them the advantage which could lead to victory in the clash which was becoming increasingly inevitable. It was this which led Salisbury to realise that Britain could no longer follow a policy of imperial expansion. Though some in his Conservative Party wanted to see Britain continue to expand, especially after the betrayal of France to gain Egypt in 1882 and then the Sudan, Salisbury began to adopt Gladstone?s approach, attempting to create a concert of all the European powers so that trade could be shared out with Britain retaining her dominant position. ...read more.

Conclusion

Grey too was concerned to maintain a balance between the two alliances to prevent the European was which could undermine Britain?s imperial domination. Whilst publicly professing a position of ?Splendid Isolation? he followed a secret policy of support for any country opposed to whichever country was threatening Britain?s imperial interests at any time. Hence alliance with Russia in 1907 when the Germans were acting aggressively against the French over Morocco in 1905 and support for the Austrians in the Balkans in 1908, 1912 and 1913, when Russia seemed to be once again threatening the independence of the small, weak countries which lay along Britain?s routes to the Middle and Far East. Thus though there was never a direct threat of attack on Britain?s empire, throughout the period it was the growing fears that Britain would find it difficult to protect her imperial trade with the wealth and status associated with it that determined Britain? policies and led to a number of apparent inconsistencies and changes. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Assess the significance of Indian nationalism in the period 1845-1947 in changing Britains relationship ...

    However, increasing self government did not lead to independence. Although Indians may argue that nationalism led to independence, this is an exaggerated claim, as it was Britain, not India and its nationalism, which ultimately controlled the events. Nationalism had many weaknesses; Congress, the centre of Indian nationalism, received hardly any support from the Muslims3 and other minorities.

  2. To what extent did the Boer War mark a turning point in Britain's relations ...

    The conditions of the concentration camps created an international outcry and in Britain produced an influential body of organised criticism against the war; the high moral tone Britain had struck in its diplomatic relations since the mid-nineteenth century rang hollow after the concentration camps of the Boer War.

  1. To what extent was Splendid Isolation the main feature of British foreign policy from ...

    The Boer War revealed just how unpopular and vulnerable Britain had become. It was also becoming increasingly apparent that Britain was having no effect in controlling the European rivalries, with trouble recurring between France and Germany over Morocco in 1911 and between Austria and Russia in the Balkans in 1908, 1912 and 1913.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that cultural imperialism was the main ...

    upcoming generation at the time, to believe strongly in the Empire, thus contributing to its expansion. Cultural imperialism soon came to an end, with the Boer War killing all popular enthusiasm for Empire building, and due to with the demobilised Conservative government and its huge national debt, which ?destroyed the optimistic case for imperil expansionism?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work