• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT WAS BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY A SUCCESS IN THE YEARS 1865 TO 1872? While Gladstone was Chancellor of the Exchequer under Palmerston, he was greatly opposed to Palmerston's aggressive foreign policy, including the use of 'gunboat diplomacy' to protect British interests and vaunt British naval superiority. As such, Gladstone pursued a policy of peace and understanding in foreign affairs. One interpretation of this approach to foreign affairs is that avoid conflict was beneficial in a variety ways; another interpretation is that this passiveness was more destructive than constructive. The former interpretation (that Gladstone's foreign policy was successful) is supported firstly by the fact that Britain was not involved in any conflicts during his first ministry. Not only did this ensure that resources were not wasted on needless wars, but it also ensured the maintenance of domestic order as it enabled reductions in income tax in 1874, reductions in government spending. Thus it can be seen that Gladstone's policy of 'peace' supported his aims at 'retrenchment' and 'reform' and so, in terms of Gladstone's own aims, his policy of peace and understanding was successful. ...read more.


This shows that Gladstone intervened when necessary, protecting British interests with dignity and minimal expense. That said, it is still clear that Gladstone was allowing Britain's grip on colonies such as Canada and New Zealand loosen, something which caused no small amount of consternation amongst the public. However, by withdrawing British troops from both of these colonies (and considering the removal of troops from unprofitable colonies such as The Gambia), Gladstone was again working at 'retrenchment' while acting diplomatically by ending the revolts. It can be said that Gladstone successfully observed a balance between economic prudence through emollient diplomacy and decisive, necessary action, fulfilling all of his primary aims through foreign policy. His minimal involvement in foreign affairs allowed him to excel domestically. As he said in 1879 in a speech in West Calder, Scotland: "Here is my first principle of foreign policy: good government at home." However, another interpretation of Gladstone's foreign policy is that it made Britain appear weak, conceding far too much to foreign rivals. The first factor supporting this is the fact that many of his decisions were met with great public disapproval, with 'The Times' labelling his foreign policy as "demoralising". ...read more.


A final way in which Gladstone's foreign policy was unsuccessful was that, although Gladstone argued that maintaining peace kept government expenditure and taxation down, situations such as the Alabama Award where Britain acted diplomatically and peacefully meant that the government lost a considerable amount of money anyway, and could have lost a lot more. This undermines one of Gladstone's central aims of 'retrenchment'. It can be said, then, that Gladstone's foreign policy alienated the public and, along with the unpopularity of his reforms, led to defeat in the 1874 elections, whilst contradicting some of his personal aims. Perhaps it would be most prudent to argue that, although Gladstone's measures were the cause of considerable unrest and often came at some form of cost, they were for the most part consistent with his aims and resulted in economic and social stability. He saw no need for great intervention and involvement, and when he did, he did so with efficiency and poise. He risked great unpopularity for what he felt was the national good, and although his party paid the cost in the 1874 elections, he was widely successful in what he set out to achieve. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent was British policy in Ireland a success in the years 1868-1886?

    4 star(s)

    It would have also made happy the Roman Catholics as they no longer had to pay the tithe which would have definitely increased the favor towards Gladstone as now he was seen as a good person as he was looking at the challenges within Ireland and the religious challenges were seen as one of the big challenges within Ireland.

  2. Disraeli vs Gladstone: foreign policy

    This was a traditional Conservative ideology, but as long as Palmerston was leader of the Liberals it was hardly possible for the Conservatives to outbid them in terms of patriotic self-assertion. In Disraeli's eyes, Russia was the real enemy, and in a private letter to the Queen he proposed "to

  1. Henry VIII'S Foreign Policy.

    In other words, he spent 1.4 million [pounds sterling] fighting wars between 1511 and 1525 -- while his ordinary income was about 110,000 [pounds sterling] a year -- and with little to show for it. It seems that he was trying to match the ambitions of wealthier monarchs such as


    Gladstone's first ministry is also known as a 'Great Reforming Ministry' for its scope and scale of reforms, including reforms to the education system, the judicial system and the Civil Service and Army. Notable social reforms were also passed in Disraeli's ministries, with the consolidation of Factory Acts, the 1875

  1. Within the context of 1880-1980, to what extent did British actions accelerate British decolonisation ...

    Moreover, two acts (The Colonial Development and Welfare Acts of 1940 and 1945) were passed during wartime which forced the British government to further invest in the colonial economies10, therefore making an already problematic economic situation worse. It is possible that the government felt it was "backed into a corner"

  2. To what extent did Disraeli achieve his aims in foreign and imperial policy?

    However, despite the eventual success of Disraeli?s measures involving foreign policy regarding the Ottoman empire, errors of judgement are visible and led to bad feeling and unrest in Britain. Disraeli?s rejection of the Berlin Memorandum as he felt the Dreikaiserbund had ulterior motives to split the Ottoman empire and saw

  1. To what extent can Wolseys foreign policy in the years 1512-29 be viewed as ...

    Wolsey chose Charles mainly because England's economy would suffer from the loss of the cloth trade industry between England and the Netherlands had France been chosen instead. However, a failure of the foreign policy, which is out of Wolsey?s control, is how England was repeatedly deserted by their allies.

  2. To what extent was the maintenance of the Balance of Power the most ...

    Britain relied a lot upon their trading with India and in 1857 there was the Indian Mutiny, which troubled Britain, as they didn?t have a secure safe route to support the troops in India.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work