• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Charles 1st responsible for causing the civil war in 1642?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Charles 1st responsible for causing the civil war in 1642? Charles 1st was reasonable to an extent, but not fully. Parliament was also to blame, but less so than Charles. Charles had a bad relationship with Parliament from the beginning, resulting in conflict between them. He believed in Divine Right of King, something that his father also believed in. Divine Right of King means that you were chosen to be King by God; therefore, God is on your side. Charles also shut down Parliament a number of times, and ruled without Parliament for a number of years. He took money from the people of his country without Parliament's permission and he introduced taxes without Parliament's permission. He started to make bigger changes to the Church, he gave the Scots a new Prayer book, and he made them use it. Parliament was greedy in the sense that when Charles did reopen Parliament that they asked for something in return, when if they did not act, their country would be punished. ...read more.

Middle

In 1639 on 20% of the Ship tax money was collected. In 1630 Archbishop William Laud made changes to Church of England.. Claiming that he and Charles were only trying to improve it, and not make in Catholic, they bought expensive paintings for it. They changed the layout, and the put in a Rood screen, which angered the people, because it was thought that everyone was equal, therefore why would one need a Rood screen. The Altar, which used to be able to be approached by anyone, was now railed off, behind the Rood screen. Charles was popular for a while. He was modernising the city by building new roads. He repaired his broken relationship with his wife. More demands kept coming in from the Parliament and the Houses of Commons, then they had a meeting and they had a voting to see which side was favourite, it ended up Parliament winning by 159 votes to 148, this was called the Grand Remonstrance. ...read more.

Conclusion

They thought it was too close to the Catholics Prayer book. In February 1642 Parliament debated some questions of religious disagreement. Some of Parliament wanted to rid Archbishop William Laud, while others of bishops all together. Parliament gave Charles more demands again, this time 19, this quarrelling had split the country in two. The MP's who were on the kings side felt this was the ' last straw '. Charles said " this would make him a mere phantom of a king ". In June 1642, Parliament ordered that all of the county's of England to raise an army to fight. This meant people had a choice, a choice that would spilt families in half because of their views. Charles raised his own army, something that Parliament did not expect. The civil war began. Parliament had their way, and Charles was executed. My view is that Charles part of the civil was significant, but not largely more significant Parliament, they provoked him throughout his rule. They may have done this knowing that he was venerable, from his damaged childhood. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Civil war break out in 1642?

    This was a new set of demands from the House of Commons. Not all of the Members of Parliament agreed to these new laws.

  2. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    This seems to be evidence that Charles was put on trial to be made an example of by parliament, so that people would draw their own conclusions about the monarchy. Charles' belief in the Divine Right was certainly a strong factor in the outcome of his trial, because it led to most of his important decisions.

  1. In August 1642 the Civil War began, it was between Parliament and the King ...

    All Ministers must be approved of by Parliament. But Charles and some MP's did not like this so Charles left London again.

  2. Was Charles I Trying to Establish Royal Absolutism during his Personal Rule?

    At the start of his reign, foreign ships had stopped observing the Dominion of the Seas when they saw an English warship when travelling up the Channel, and this was humiliating for England. All revenue raised from Ship Money was spent on the navy, and fine and powerful ships could be built such as the Sovereign of the Seas.

  1. What was the legacy that Charles 1st Inherited? How would it affect his relationship ...

    This was an expensive investment and parliament were very upset that the king had sent out an expedition, against their wishes and used up a vast majority of the kings money in trying to carry it out. This led to parliament breeding a dis-trusting atmosphere surrounding the king and his methods.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    Yet Charles was the only man who could have prevented this, being the sole leader of his forces and his failure to do so led to villages in the west supporting Parliament instead. The divisions of opinion between his generals, as stated in the paragraph above, were the reason that

  1. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    A parley was accepted and the governor of the prison invited them to lunch. Unfortunately, the crowd outside 'worried' for their safety, presuming them to be either imprisoned or awaiting execution. The Bastille was stormed, and as a result Louis' royal troops pulled out of Paris.

  2. In 1640 most MP's wanted and expected redress of grievances and a settlement of ...

    Some wanted the Presbyterian model while others felt no need to remove bishops, instead just reducing their power. When Parliament had the common enemy of the Laudia reforms to fight they were united, but remove the common enemy and they began to fight amongst themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work