• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was England A Protestant Country By 1547?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Was England A Protestant Country By 1547? Before it is possible to begin to analyse the extent to which England had turned to Protestantism by 1547, it is necessary to establish a solid understanding of what Protestantism actually is. Protestantism is a branch of Christianity that split off from Roman Catholicism in the early 1500s which protested against a number of the ideologies of the Catholic Church. Through sola fide and sola scriptura, these Protestants rejected many of the Seven Sacraments that the Catholic Church abode to, as they felt they were unnecessary and merely money making tools for the Church in Rome. With these ideas in mind, it is now possible to scrutinise whether or not the Church within England in 1547 conformed to these ideologies. Although there is a certain amount of evidence which would suggest that England was moving towards Protestantism, there is also a great deal of evidence which would suggest that there was still a considerable distance to go before England could be fully classified as a Protestant country. Some historians argue that by 1547 England had become a Protestant country and there is some evidence which would reinforce this theory. Firstly, the Break with Rome during the 1530s showed that England could no longer be regarded as Roman Catholic as the Pope was no longer prominent within England. Therefore, with the newly formed Protestant religion diminishing the role of the Pope, it is understandable why some would classify England as a Protestant country in 1547. ...read more.

Middle

Following the break with Rome, there were very few changes to the way the Church actually functioned. This runs parallel with the theory that Henry's break with Rome was not due to religious reasons, as there were few religious changes following this, but because he had "no legitimate male heir: [meaning] the Tudor dynasty was at risk"3, due to his desire to gain extra power within England and his requirements for extra finance to fund his expensive tastes and grand foreign policy. Many historians argue that throughout his life Henry had devout Catholic beliefs, but required the split to make his personal objectives a reality. This meant that once he was head of the Church, he did not feel that it was necessary to make any radical theological or doctrinal changes. All of this evidence would suggest that England did not actually change its beliefs to Protestantism, but was just no longer a part of the Roman Catholic Church. It is important to make this distinction, as many other countries in Europe were shifting to Protestantism due to their religious beliefs, and not for other non-religious reasons which were present within England. Despite the fact that the Bible was now being translated into the vernacular, there was little change in the personnel of the clergy or the way in which they went about their services. The traditional Roman Catholic procedures were still being undertaken, and yet for England to be classified as Protestant it would be necessary for these to end and the new Protestant actions that had become present in the Holy Roman Empire to come to the fore. ...read more.

Conclusion

These believers were in the minority, and therefore it is difficult for the whole country to be classified by their beliefs. With this in mind, it is certainly starting to become clear that England could not be called a Protestant country in 1547. On balance, the evidence would suggest that although in certain aspects England was becoming a Protestant country, it is difficult to argue that as a country England was Protestant by 1547. Although it is true to say that England was no longer a Roman Catholic country, it is best to say that England was in a state of Limbo, in other words England was no longer Catholic, yet had not fully introduced the ideas of Protestantism. It was certainly the case that following Henry's death the Reformers were able to take advantage of their increasingly strengthened position to convert England to a Protestant country, but it can not be said that England had been fully converted by 1547. 1 Dickens, A.G, The English Reformation, Fontana Press (1986) 2 Simon Fish on Clerical Vices 3 Guy, John, Tudor England, Oxford University Press (1990), p. 116 4 Servini, Peter, The Tudor Years (Lotherington Ed.), Hodder Murray (2003) 5 Davies, C.S.L, Peace, Print and Protestantism, Hart-Davis (1976), p. 188 6 Haigh, Christopher, English Reformations: Religion, Politics and Society Under the Tudor, Clarendon Press (1993) 7 Guy, John, Tudor England, Oxford University Press (1990), p. 178 ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Crick 12.1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To What Extent Was England Protestant by 1547?

    Some may say that this evidence of Protestantism can be balanced by examples of how England was remaining Catholic, for example the introduction of the Six Articles in 1539, as these showed key Catholic ideas, such as transubstantiation and celibate priests.

  2. To what extent was the Henrican Reformation imposed from 'above'?

    Popular attitudes were to a considerable difficult to reform. Additionally religious guilds were also popular. They were organisations, usually concerned with a craft but were primarily concerned with religion. They often supported a parish church, organised members funerals or the saying of mass after their death, hence the belief that

  1. How far was England a Protestant nation on the death of Henry VIII in ...

    and the Supremacy (Henry as the Head of the Church, not the Pope). The Act of Supremacy, passed in 1534, came with an oath of supremacy delivered to all religious houses. The oath declared Henry as the Supreme Head of the Church of England, not the Pope.

  2. To what extent was Henry's decision to break with Rome influenced by Thomas Cranmer ...

    At the time of the initial stages of the reformation, Cromwell was chief legal advisor to Thomas Wolsey, and from this position he was able to exert his influence on the king's court. Many of Wolsey's initial reforms were orchestrated by Cromwell, such as the dissolution of smaller monasteries.

  1. "To what extent had Henry VIII left an explosive legacy to his son Edward ...

    The legacy in foreign policy was much more of an explosive approach than that of his fathers. Henry influenced Edward VI's aim in foreign policy. Henry allied with weaker nations against the stronger to prevent any one country from become more powerful.

  2. To what extent was england a protestant country by 1547

    and also the royal supremacy made it slightly more difficult for Henry VIII to suppress the rise of Protestantism. Many of these changes also made it extremely difficult to prevent full Catholicism but there was still a small chance that a return could be enforced.

  1. How Far At the Death of Mary I, In 1558, Was England a Roman ...

    The majority of the populace had changed religion under the assumption that it was their duty to do as their sovereign told them. But they had great respect for those who were willing to be martyrs and did not see them on the road to Hell as Mary did, but on the road to Heaven.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    This image speculation of Katherine by Bingham (2011, pg 81) is mostly subjective opinion as the devoted nurse imagery had been popularised by the Victorian view of the time, which seems to have progressed to contemporary theories. A most reliable interpretation however in comparison is Porter?s (2010, pg 200)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work