• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Germany a 'uniquely unstable' society at the turn of the 19th/20th Century?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Germany a 'uniquely unstable' society at the turn of the 19th/20th Century? When looking at Germany at the turn of the 20th Century, we will consider two terms; 'unique' and 'unstable'. Was Germany unstable at this time and was this instability unique to Germany? According to the Oxford Dictionary, 'unstable' means to not be firmly established and likely to change or fall and the term, 'unique', means being the only one of its kind and unlike anything else. It is important to look at all factors effecting Germany at this time, particularly the political leaders and their style of leadership. From 1862- 1890, Otto von Bismarck, held the role of Minister-President of Prussia. After overseeing the unification of Germany, he became Chancellor of the North German Confederation (1867) and after designing the German Empire, he became its first Chancellor until his dismissal in 1890. Bismarck has been remembered for his powerful rule and has been nicknamed, "The Iron Chancellor." ...read more.


With the fall of Bismarck, Wilhelm II resolved to be his own chancellor but he was to demonstrate a lack of the application and patience needed for the continuous exercise of power. Domestic politics in Germany, under Wilhelm II, became fluid and unpredictable and the complicated system of Government created by Bismarck worked less smoothly under his successors. This tangled political system contributed to the political instability that we see in Germany at this time. Other European countries held firm political systems which did not crumble depending on the holder of the position. An example is with Great Britain; Queen Victoria did not force Lord Salisbury to resign as Prime Minister, so that she could hold both positions. This kind of political instability was unique to Germany in the sense that other countries did not experience this sort of insecurity. This merge of power caused people to be confused about where real authority lay in Germany. ...read more.


This boost in the economy was not unique to Germany and was happening in other countries as well, mainly Great Britain. It is also clear that Germany was in a firm and stable position at this time, despite the occasional recession. It was clear that Germany was politically unstable at the turn of the century, with the constitution perhaps being the biggest flaw in the political system. However, this flaw as not exposed until Emperor Wilhelm II and Chancellor Bismarck had to work together; the constitution was designed on the assumption that both the Emperor and Chancellor work effectively together. This was unique to Germany; no other country had this system, no other country was this politically unstable and no other country had a character similar to Bismarck in Germany. However, Germany economically stable and had overtaken Great Britain in becoming the leading industrial superpower; the population rose, technology advanced and production increased. It is fascinating to see two aspects of Germany at this time; a politically unstable Germany with few people knowing where real authority lay and an economically stable country with a booming economy. ?? ?? ?? ?? Alex Buchanan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    This naturally leads to the question, was Bismarck a product of German society, or was German society a product of Bismarck? To some extent, one can clearly argue that German society is a product of Bismarck, for clearly it would not have existed in such great unity if it were not for Bismarck.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    But this is only half the truth about Hitler, for the baffling problem about this strange figure is to determine the degree to which he was swept along by a genuine belief in his own inspiration and the degree to which he deliberately exploited the irrational side of human nature, both in himself and others, with a shrewd calculation.

  1. Adlof Hitler and Joseph Stalin were the two of the most powerful dictators in ...

    AGRICULTURE, INDUSTRY AND THEIR CONTROL OVER THE ECONOMY: Both Hitler and Stalin achieved a stable economy. When Hitler came to power in 1933, he had two main economic priorities. First was to pull Germany through the great depression and to reduce unemployment.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    he could use the bogey of a French war of revenge to make the Reichstag maintain a high level of German armaments. And.... Thirdly.... his diplomatic genius could keep France isolated". But the first of these assumptions was grossly misplaced, showing Bismarck's naivety.

  1. Of all the factors that contributed to the unification of the German people in ...

    He solved the constitutional crisis by withdrawing the military budget, and declared that the support by the Lower House was not needed, and that the reforms for the army will come from taxation. From these taxes, the army was reformed, and the Prussian army grew in strength and efficiency.

  2. To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between ...

    working silently but irresistibly to remove the rigidities and divisions within our nation"5 By the middle of century, the Zollverien had generated a substantial political momentum in that its non-Prussian members had come to identify their economic interest with integration with Prussia.

  1. Do imperial strengths outweigh weaknesses in Germany by 1890?

    German agriculture was suffering from bad harvests in the 1870s and from the USA and Russia. As the price of wheat fell, German farmers suffered. Bismarck understood the dangers of a prolonged agrarian depression. Bismarck also knew that relying on foreign grain would seriously weaken Germany's strength in time of war.

  2. During the 20th century, the political doctrines of Socialism and Fascism saw widespread support ...

    The total suffocating lack of freedom, the reckless expansionism, the tireless pursuit of power by the ruling party, and the mass murder of large segments of the population was a trade mark of both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. For all of Hitler's talk about the importance of the Aryan

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work