• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Germany guilty of causing the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Germany guilty of causing the First World War? By Phillip Preston 12.8 The topic of German guilt in relation to World War One is one of the most fiercely debated ones in history. Although it is far easier to blame just one country, we must consider others that had a hand in the causing of the conflict, and to take a critical look at those countries that won the war, since they also are partly to blame. This blame however has been diminished in the classic 'victor code' (i.e. those who win have done no wrong and can write the story to suit their own glorification). What cannot be refuted is the aggression of Germany, and their desires for conflict to aid their international situation. It is therefore necessary to decide how far this contributed to war. This essay will demonstrate other factors and views that shed light on the fact that Germany was not completely to blame for the war, as so many think it is. Incidents such as the Alliance systems, the Imperial situation and of course, the Balkans, where the whole war started and was not, ironically, the direct result of a German action. ...read more.

Middle

What the alliances did lead to however, was the situation in the Balkans. The situation in the Balkans, with the two crises, was made ever more dangerous thanks to the alliances, as the two largest countries with interests in the region were Russia and Austria-Hungary whom were on opposite sides. This immediate situation can be attributed to Germany, since they started the alliance systems, and so they must take blame for this. Yet the two crises themselves cannot be the fault of Germany since they played no part in them. The Bosnian Crisis especially, since that was entirely owing to dealings between Austria-Hungary and Russia. Germany, and indeed the rest of the world, had no idea that these deals were going on! When the crisis came to fruition, Germany initially took the side of the Turks, leaving their ally in the lurch, and completely avoiding the possibility of conflict with Russia. This absolves Germany of blame entirely. The second crisis as well did not concern Germany. In fact the only hand that Germany had in these two crises was being the 'silent' power behind Austria-Hungary and took no direct action against or for any side, she is almost entirely absolved of any guilt on this charge. ...read more.

Conclusion

This again cleared Germany of any damning guilt associated with the war until the discovery of the 1912 'War Council' controversy in which German military leaders planned a war two years into the future. This again is not proof that they were guilty for the war, as Britain also wanted to wait for war so they could prepare their navy and so on. Indeed the Schlieffen plan was drawn up 20 years earlier and this cannot be taken as war guilt for its sheer ludicrousness. A military tactical plan drawn up by one German general 20 years earlier cannot be classed as proof they started the war since the French were doing exactly the same. As I said earlier, it was the presence of many such documents from all the different countries that led to war rather than the alliances. It is clear to see therefore, that whilst the evident aggressor of the period and driving force towards war was Germany, the many factors that caused the war can only be partially attributed to Germany, or in some cases, not at all. In light of the Treaty of Versailles, it is evident that the 'victor code' has indeed been enforced upon Germany who was made to take the blame for everyone. Surely denying your involvement in such a perpetration of destruction on an unimaginable scale is far worse than admitting your own small part in it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    Historians argue the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand was nothing to do with Germany therefore as a country it had no need in which to get involve. Unless of course, war was always there intention. This is yet another piece of evidence that suggest German was a cause of WWI; she seemed to thrive on causing endless disputes and unrest.

  2. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    After this buffer was removed in 1912 conflict in the Balkans became inevitable as Austria and Russia found themselves in constant dispute. It must be established that it was solely due to Germany and the Schlieffen plan that conflict in the Balkans meant conflict on the continent.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    the journalist Kamel Mrouweh in 1966 and was very much a local Beirut thug (qabaday). Trained and armed by Fateh, al-Murabitun, which included Palestinian and Lebanese fighters, received Libyan money. For Arafat, the formation of al-Murabitun met three objectives: (i)

  2. American History.

    during the war] and also exported items such as cotton, lumber and sugar in exchange for manufactures. As a result of the Embargo Act and the war, however, domestic manufacturing increased. - Samuel Slater set up the first textile mill in the 1790s, but manufacturing didn't really pick up until

  1. Britain and the First World War

    Falkenhayn seems to express his views more clearly than Foch does. Falkenhayn says that the Germans had greater modified defence warfare than the Allies when it states the German army's 'morale is sound...is not seriously inferior in numbers'. Falkenhayn clearly has more of a defensive attitude and goes further than

  2. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    There are many reasons as to why the allies defeated Germany. Source D illustrates one aspect. Source D shows Adolf Hitler ordering troops to invade the USSR but they turn into graves instead. From my own knowledge I know that this occurred on June 22nd 1942.

  1. Truman - Guilty or Innocent

    This was called the Truman Doctrine. It is often said that Truman advocated containment (stopping the Soviet getting any more powerful), but Truman did not use this word and many Americans spoke of "rolling back" communism. In June 1947, General George Marshall made a visit to Europe to see what was needed.

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    Rationing did not end in 1945, but lasted until 1953. Some foods, notably bread, were rationed for the first time after the end of the war. It was believed that bread would have been too much of a blow to people's morale while the fighting was still going on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work