• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was government action the main cause of unrest in Henry VIII's reign and was government ever under serious threat?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was government action the main cause of unrest in Henry VIII's reign and was government ever under serious threat Henry VIII faced arguably the two most serious threats in Tudor government. The Pilgrimage of Grace was by far the largest of all the rebellions seen under a Tudor king or queen and the Amicable Grant was the only rebellion to which a Tudor monarch gave way. Though, Henry faced the least rebellions, his were the most dangerous. Some historians have said that these two outbreaks had the ability to over throw the dynasty. Others believe that it was the changing atmosphere that created the uprisings. The Henrician Reformation was largely blamed for the Pilgrimage of Grace and the Amicable Grant rooted its problems in the action the government took against France. Following the capture of Francis I, King of France, by the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles IV; Henry believed an opportunity was created to strengthen his claim on the French throne. War always required heavy finance which usually came in the form of tax. Regardless of Parliament's granting Henry the ability to accumulate the taxes, its implementation was extremely difficult. ...read more.

Middle

The Pilgrimage of Grace offers a more complex issue, since it does not have a single factor nor was a concentrated rebellion. The rebellion though largely in the north spread from Lincolnshire to Yorkshire (where the main rebellion took place) to Cumberland. It lasted a long time for a Tudor rebellion, beginning in October and ending in January. This added to the seriousness of the threat. Further more, Henry's forces were minute in comparison to the 40,000 strong revolt. Historians have varying opinions on the main cause of the rebellion and consensus cannot easily be found. Fletcher and MacCullock identify the Henrician Reformation as the main cause and to a greater extent it is true that the religion was an important theme that ran through the Pontefract Articles. However, it was indeed the gentry under the influence of the clergy who wrote the list of demands and hence further evidence is needed. Religion is also crucial in finding and umbrella under which a cross-section of society can come together. The dissolution of the smaller monasteries by Cromwell led to unrest in the north since charity was one of their prominent tasks as Davies hints. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is also important to remember that the Pilgrimage of Grace was not a single rebellion but a watershed term for several rebellions. Key nobles such as the Duke of Norfolk were against it, weakening the revolt's effectiveness. Nevertheless, it did catch the government unaware and did make Henry cringe at the thought of its possible success. In conclusion, Henry's government did face a relatively stable and long period of rule. This does mean that the threat may have over-thrown the comparatively short periods of reign of Edward VI and Mary I but for Henry and Elizabeth it was an unlikely situation. However, it is not to say that the threat is only a footnote, as in the end the two rebellions did achieve either all or most of their aims in the future. Hence, they were a point of influence upon him. In terms of government action being the main cause, it can be said with confidence that this was the case. The actions of Henry's chief ministers did lead to much of the unrest throughout the country, and though there were bad harvests and poor trade, the government was largely to blame when it came to change. The problem faced was the modernising of a conservative nation at such as rapid pace especially during Cromwell's period of influence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    delusion that if it were not for the episcopate, the Queen would have been anxious for the Church to be further reformed', showing the Queen was dealing with the situation cleverly to try and keep the public on her side.

  2. To what extent was government action the main cause of unrest in Henry VIII's ...

    It was his own selfish needs that put him in a position that made him look weak. In addition, resentment was worsened when certain counties were exempt from paying the taxes, mostly those that bordered Scotland. Historians such as Scarisbrick say '[the collectors] came upon lambs already close shorn'.

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    Due to this James realised that they would not cause too many problems for him and he promoted them, however this decision was disliked by many MP's who regarded Arminians as little better then papists. Further leniency was shown towards them when in 1622, James, understanding that the Arminians disrespected

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    Cromwell can also be viewed as a villain in this respect because he used them to gain power and then disposed of them. This was an unfair and unwarranted act. Another situation was with 'Women', they wanted a share in freedoms of this state and an equal interest for the nation.

  1. To what extent was Henry VI to blame for the troubles in England in ...

    England was desperate for a strong King. Henry failed to make a positive impact. Instead, he slipped in to a mental breakdown and became completely unaware of everything that was going on around him. His breakdown lasted more than a year.

  2. How serious a threat did the pretenders pose to Henry VII's crown?

    Warbeck received some support in Ireland but it was not enough to give him a safe base. By 1492 Warbeck had found his first protector in Charles VIII of France. However the Treaty of Etaples put an end to this phase of the impostor's career and he along with his

  1. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    There is a 3 hour-long battle, but in the ends Henry wins. The consequences of this are - Henry passes acts of attainder on anyone he felt was opposing him, to keep them weak, and as a warning to others not to get involved in rebellions in the future.

  2. How dangerous were the threats to Henry VII's government?

    Martin Swartz led the German army, and Maximilian of Burgundy funded the German invasion force. From a few Yorkist supporting Simnel's cause, it wasn't long till nearly half of Europe provided their own backing and support. Henry soon reacted to the crowing of Simnel and the size of the support

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work