• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was Henry Vll Secure?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Was Henry Vll Secure? Henry was fairly insecure regarding the throne, referring to his relations with the Yorkists, pretenders, rebellions, the nobility, finance and his succession. Henry had bad relations with the Yorkists, after defeating Richard III at the battle of Bosworth in 1485 he became king by right of conquest and therefore all the Yorkists would be against him for killing their former monarch. Henry descended from Edward III son, John of Gaunt, but only through his mistress Katherine Swynford, the Lancastrian Henry was aware that his right to the throne by descent was not to strong, and there were at least a dozen others with a better claim. Because of this fact many resented him and especially the Yorkists, Through the Acts of Attainder those Yorkists who fought against Henry were traitors and he could legally take their land and possessions, he used this way to remove many Yorkists from power to solve the problem of the large amount of 'over mighty subjects'. There were a few early threats from Yorkists during Henry VII reign. John de la pole was the nominated heir to the throne and therefore obviously wouldn't have liked Henry's actions; however he was put on the council by Henry as he was seen as a good member to have after swearing loyalty to the king, but later died fighting against Henry in the battle of East Stoke. ...read more.


What happened here shows just what they think about the king by killing his representative, the earl of Northumberland. The War of the Roses effectively is still present, as the leader of the rebellion was a Yorkist so was probably just using the subsidy as an excuse to rebel against Lancastrian rule. The second rebellion was the Cornish rising of 1497 when a tax was introduced to pay for the war against Perkin Warbeck and the Cornish thought why should they have to pay to defend the North at Warbecks attack from Scotland? The rebels march through England and there are 15,000 of them by the time they reach London, Henry gathered a force of 25,000 men and very easily the rebels are defeated with 1000 rebels killed. We can see from the rebellions that the English people didn't have much respect for him and weren't willing to pay his taxes and I'm sure they would have hesitated to kill Henry just like they killed his representative In the Yorkshire rebellion. Although from the rebellions we saw his army could stand the threat and force of 15,000 rebels, therefore in this was he was quite secure but he only needed one big rebellion and possibly he could have been defeated. ...read more.


He began to negotiate with France and Spain. At the same time, he married his daughter, Margaret, to James IV of Scotland, thereby assuring a Scottish amity for the remainder of the reign However the succession was by no means secure in Henry VII reign. When Henry VII heir Prince Arthur died prematurely on April 2, 1502 Prince Henry was only ten, and if he were not to survive there remained only his sisters Margaret and Mary. Henry VII fell ill shortly after Arthur's death, making the continuance of the dynasty suddenly seemed doubtful. However Henry would live for seven more years giving Prince Henry enough time to mature, and Henry VII enough time to further consolidate his dynasty Henry died on 21st Apr, 1509 at Richmond Palace, Surrey. And perhaps in his very death his greatest achievement is revealed, for his son, Henry VIII succeeded him peacefully, with no immediate rival to challenge the crown. Less than 25 years after Henry VII had risked all on Bosworth Field, his throne was secure in his dynasty. In conclusion during Henry VII reign he was insecure however he handled his reign well. A reign in which he survived plots from the Yorkists, threats from pretenders, defeated the rebellions, had a child and treated the nobility with care. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    have been the increase in revenue from the bonds, the fact remains that it suppressed the nobility as large amounts of their wealth had to be given to the King, the amount was in Henry VII control. The last way that Henry VII reduced the nobilities power is through the

  2. Essay: How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?

    Clearly one of James's motives for the invasion of northern England was the hatred for Scotland's greatest enemy, and maybe he used Warbeck for an excuse to do so. Up until the summer of 1497 James tries to invade but is repelled by Henry's strong forces.

  1. The Battle of Bosworth.

    So this was Richard's predicament. He was on top of the hill, his western flank was being attacked by Henry. Henry, however, was running out of men and soon, even with the strategy of defence, he would run out of men and soon be in a predicament of his own.

  2. How serious a threat did the pretenders pose to Henry VII's crown?

    The most devastating supporter of Warbeck for Henry however came from within his very own royal court itself, in the form of Sir William Stanley, Henry's Lord Chamberlain. Stanley made the destructive comment; "I would not stand in the way if Warbeck was Richard IV."

  1. How Secure was Henry VII?

    A number of Yorkists supported him, many knowing this was only a fake just so that they could get back into Yorkists rule, in May 1487 Simnel and his supporters, led by John de la Pole crossed to England and were defeated by Henrys forces.

  2. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    Henry's reactions to the pretenders meant they were less of a threat. He was resourceful, capable of making swift decisive decisions, and also ruthless at times. In the case of Lambert Simnel, Henry's reactions are fairly reasonable. When Simnel is crowned King in Dublin, Henry does not act rashly, and

  1. Henry was threatened several times during his reign all of varying seriousness. The pretenders ...

    It must have shocked Henry to hear that several thousand rebels had marched unchallenged from Cornwall to Blackheath, making Henry unsure who he could call on in times of difficulty. The sheer fact that they managed to march unopposed across England was a threat in itself but marching directly on

  2. Within the context of the period 1337-1471, to what extent can Henry VI be ...

    At this point, Henry VI did seem to act of his own accord, as the fact that he made the deal a secret suggest that he knew that many people would disapprove of his actions. All this suggests that Henry was fully in charge of the government and its decisions,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work