• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy to blame for the out break of war in 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy to blame for the out break of war in 1939? Hitler had three main foreign policy aims. The first of these was to unite all German speaking peoples into one 'Reich' empire. The second of these was to gain 'lebensraum' living space in the east. The third of these was to destroy the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was on the road to recovery after all its hardships, through the help of the doors plan (aid from the allies). Then in 1929 the great depression hit and the U.S.A recalled all its loans which left Germany in a state of crisis. With no work in Germany people were starving. Hitler saw his chance and told the people what they wanted to hear and by 1932 the Nazi party had gained 230 seats in government. The next year Hitler came to power in Germany. His first action was to take Germany out of the League of Nations over an argument about disarming. ...read more.

Middle

The Stresa Front was finally delt its last blow when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia. This put Hitler to the back of peoples minds, and while Britain and France worried over what to do about Abyssinia, Hitler Ordered the remilitarization of the Rhineland. This was the biggest gamble of his career because if France or Britain had shown any resistance Hitler had told his Generals to pull out immediately. But Britain and France did nothing, France was to preoccupied with it internal problems and Britain said he was marching in his own back yard also it was clear by now that neither of these two countries wanted war and where increasingly following a policy of appeasement. This success of the remilitarization of the Rhineland gave Hitler confidence and increased the risks he would take to get what he wanted i.e. made his foreign policy more aggressive. In 1936 the Spanish Civil war began. In this war Hitler and Mussolini backed the side of Franco, this was the begging to the alliance between Germany and Italy. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Sudetenland and also a piece of paper was signed to say that never would Britain and Germany go to war with each other again. Then in 1939 Hitler ordered the invasion of the rest of Czechoslovakia this marked the end of Britain's appeasement and Britain began rapid rearmament and promised that Britain and France would protect Poland as this was Hitler's obvious next target. This was it war! But could this have been avoided? The answer is yes. Although Hitler was aggressive with his foreign policy aims if England or France had stood up to him a lot earlier e.g. over the Rhineland it is most likely the Second World War could have been delayed and even possibly prevented. Appeasement was the key to Hitler's success, by giving in to his small demands made him slowly more ambitious which in turn led to difficult circumstances and then war. Another argument is if the Treaty of Versailles had been less harsh then the Weimar Republic would have been stronger and stayed in power this stopping Hitler from coming to power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    However, to his anger, Schuschnigg called for a referendum upon his return to Austria, in which he asked the people to "affirm their support for Austrian impendence". Allowing this referendum to take place could have spelt bad news for the possibility of Anschluss - a negative result on Hitler's part would make it far more difficult to achieve the union.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Officers, the law stated, were to be chosen without regard to birth, religion, or social standing. An order was to be disobeyed if it would lead to the commission of a crime, but if the soldier obeyed without knowing his act was unlawful, he was to be adjudged innocent.

  1. Vietnam war

    close down the transfer of supplies and men along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, take pressure off a fragile Cambodian government threatened by its own communist insurgency´┐Ż11th of November 1968, Operation Commando Hunt was issued by the US, with the goal of disrupting supplies through the Ho Chi Minh Trail´┐Ż30 million tonnes dropped on Cambodia's border.

  2. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    Although Disraeli felt that it was necessary to support the Turks despite their actions in Bulgaria in order to deter Russia from gaining power on territory on the pretext of moral intervention, Gladstone would have found this inexcusable according to his personal moral code and 'European sense', principally derived from

  1. Mussolini and Hitler: Road to Power

    This was the starting point of fascism. After WW1 this was exactly what people wanted to hear, and in the 1921 elections his party won 35 seats in parliament. Hitler had remained in the army after the war, employed as a spy; to go around political parties and report information about them.

  2. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    Later the Germans over-stretched their Atlantic Wall with the deployment of 30,000 extra troops to reinforce the Norwegian sector. Clearly Hitler had taken the bait that Norway might well be the scene of an invasion attempt and thus "the zone of destiny in this war."16 Ladd concludes "a modest navel

  1. "Nazi policy towards the Jews up to 1939 was uncoordinated and erratic."

    This minor revolution from below highlights that the Nazi Party was not in full control of the implementation of their policies. The debate on whether Jewsih policy was a result from above or below is key to understanding whether Nazi Policy was uncoordinated or erratic.

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    Another key factor in the cause of war was the failure of collective Security. Set up as an all-powerful organisation to prevent another war the League of Nations had no real power and lacked authority. Richard Overy argues that it did not reflect the changing balance of power that occurred by the 1930?s.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work