• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917? Lenin's leadership is a huge, and probably the main, contributing factor to the success of the Bolsheviks. His strong and decisive bid for power, in the name of the Bolsheviks, set the party on the right track for a revolution - without him the remaining Bolsheviks would have been very unlikely to make a bid for power, due to the absence of a leader and a motivator; therefore, would have probably adopted a Menshevik position of support for the Provisional Government. The aforementioned probable path of the Bolsheviks if there was the absence of Lenin is clearly illustrated by Kamenev - the leader of the three-man committee which controlled and commanded the Bolshevik political activity in Petrograd in 1917 - and his adoption of a policy of support for the Provisional Government, and even his inclination in merging with the Mensheviks, views of which Stalin fully agreed with. With nobody opposing these views, the Bolshevik party will have dissolved and just become a part of the Provisional Government or the Mensheviks. ...read more.

Middle

Within the April theses Lenin expressed views of the land. The early 20th century saw the Russian peasants hunger for land. This is due to two main causes - one of which is the measly 1/3 of Russian arable land sold to peasants after the abolishment of serfdom (1861), and the second being the huge rural population increase from 70 million (1861) to 130 million (1917). With so little land, coupled with so many occupants, the usefulness of the land began to dim. The Bolsheviks came as a saviour to the peasant's problem with the "All land to the peasantry" policy - put forward by Lenin in the April Theses - which greatly appealed to peasants and involved forceful land seizures by the peasants, upon the wealthy in 1917. This course of action is of course opposed to the Provisional Government, which was against illegal seizures. Lenin's intelligence in appealing to the peasantry - which made up the largest proportion of the population - simultaneously downsizing the power, aims and nature of the Provisional Government allowed the Bolshevik's to gain the advantage over their opponents. ...read more.

Conclusion

in which the Bolsheviks gained 24% of the votes, with the SRs in front with 53%. These results clearly shows that the Bolsheviks were gaining favour and coupled with the SR, would have been undefeatable. Although Lenin's leadership of the Bolshevik's into their victory is most probably the main reason for their success, one must consider the weaknesses and failures of the Provisional Government, which in turn allowed the Bolsheviks, and Lenin, to gain support. In contradiction with Lenin and the Bolsheviks, the Provisional Government decided to continue the war; leading to more inflation at home, which severely disrupts the economy and created widespread opposition at home - moreover, with Kerensky's blunders such as his offensive against Germany, it is no wonder that the Provisional Government began to lose contact and favour with the citizens of the nation. These severe negative impacts on the Government were not helped by the fact that they failed to call the Constituent Assembly early enough - therefore, the Bolsheviks who honed a more hands on approach were favoured much more by the peasants and the citizens as opposed to the weak, indecisive and incompetent actions of the Provisional Government. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lenin's Leadership - Bolshevik Success 2007 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Such marches, like the famous one from the Channel coast to the Danube in 1805, were the exception. * When he needed to, Napoleon could organise the rapid movement of large numbers of men over wide areas to converge on his chosen target, but normally his marches were shorter, slower and lesser dramatic.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    Their minority status and the fact that they were new to power was not a very positive position for them. As leaders they were responsible for making crucial decisions for Russia. The war situation had to be dealt while still keeping Lenin's promise of land and food for peasants and workers.

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Alliluyeva's opinions may be affected by her confidence in her father and belief in his innocence. Stalin's actual need for the Purges was distorted by Yezhov, Beria to some extent and the ordinary Soviet citizens. For fear of being purged themselves the country had to denounce and look out for any hint of sabotage or espionage.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    A further 100,000 men were garrisoned in and around Moscow, and 32,000 soldiers and sailors were stationed at Kronstadt. For the most part the men of the garrisons were either over or under age, or else recovering from wounds. They were mostly peasant in background and thus many of them

  1. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    This put great pressure on the Tsar and protest and discontent increased. Also when the Tsar took control of what was happening at the front it brought all the problems to his door and when things went wrong he was blamed for it; before he could blame failure on his generals.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    Instead it built up all of its forces in an attempt to cope with any type of scenario, but also continually changed its military proprieties. This was in contrast to Germany, which focused on Blitzkrieg. This left the Soviet Army with no clear objective.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Most women remained second-class citizens. 6. There was no personal or political freedom ï religious believers often persecuted, no free press, all cultural activity controlled, people could not travel freely and there were no free elections. 7. Population bombarded with constant propaganda.

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    Crucially, Lenin outlined that he wanted to abandon all co-operation with other parties and overthrow the Provisional Government. In doing this, the Bolshevik Party disassociated itself with the failures of the government to deal with food and land issues, as well as the continuing of the war with Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work