• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917? Lenin's leadership is a huge, and probably the main, contributing factor to the success of the Bolsheviks. His strong and decisive bid for power, in the name of the Bolsheviks, set the party on the right track for a revolution - without him the remaining Bolsheviks would have been very unlikely to make a bid for power, due to the absence of a leader and a motivator; therefore, would have probably adopted a Menshevik position of support for the Provisional Government. The aforementioned probable path of the Bolsheviks if there was the absence of Lenin is clearly illustrated by Kamenev - the leader of the three-man committee which controlled and commanded the Bolshevik political activity in Petrograd in 1917 - and his adoption of a policy of support for the Provisional Government, and even his inclination in merging with the Mensheviks, views of which Stalin fully agreed with. With nobody opposing these views, the Bolshevik party will have dissolved and just become a part of the Provisional Government or the Mensheviks. ...read more.

Middle

Within the April theses Lenin expressed views of the land. The early 20th century saw the Russian peasants hunger for land. This is due to two main causes - one of which is the measly 1/3 of Russian arable land sold to peasants after the abolishment of serfdom (1861), and the second being the huge rural population increase from 70 million (1861) to 130 million (1917). With so little land, coupled with so many occupants, the usefulness of the land began to dim. The Bolsheviks came as a saviour to the peasant's problem with the "All land to the peasantry" policy - put forward by Lenin in the April Theses - which greatly appealed to peasants and involved forceful land seizures by the peasants, upon the wealthy in 1917. This course of action is of course opposed to the Provisional Government, which was against illegal seizures. Lenin's intelligence in appealing to the peasantry - which made up the largest proportion of the population - simultaneously downsizing the power, aims and nature of the Provisional Government allowed the Bolshevik's to gain the advantage over their opponents. ...read more.

Conclusion

in which the Bolsheviks gained 24% of the votes, with the SRs in front with 53%. These results clearly shows that the Bolsheviks were gaining favour and coupled with the SR, would have been undefeatable. Although Lenin's leadership of the Bolshevik's into their victory is most probably the main reason for their success, one must consider the weaknesses and failures of the Provisional Government, which in turn allowed the Bolsheviks, and Lenin, to gain support. In contradiction with Lenin and the Bolsheviks, the Provisional Government decided to continue the war; leading to more inflation at home, which severely disrupts the economy and created widespread opposition at home - moreover, with Kerensky's blunders such as his offensive against Germany, it is no wonder that the Provisional Government began to lose contact and favour with the citizens of the nation. These severe negative impacts on the Government were not helped by the fact that they failed to call the Constituent Assembly early enough - therefore, the Bolsheviks who honed a more hands on approach were favoured much more by the peasants and the citizens as opposed to the weak, indecisive and incompetent actions of the Provisional Government. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lenin's Leadership - Bolshevik Success 2007 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    He therefore concentrated from 105 onwards on dealing with his enemies on land, while keeping up an attack on Britain by means of the Continental Blockade. vii) Napoleon's Generalship - an Assessment * Many historians are no longer willing to accept that Napoleon was a great general.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    As early as mid-June, some Bolshevik organizers feared that the soldiers would transfer their support to the anarchists if the Bolsheviks backed down on their promise to help stage mass demonstrations in protest to the preparations being made by the Provisional Government for a military offensive.

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    With the example of Trotsky this could well be due to a grudge he held against Stalin for having him exiled. Trotsky was not entirely critical of Stalin, so his writings are not simply anti-Stalin as Trotsky's correspondent appreciates that if it weren't for Stalin's isolation and the hatred of

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    Whilst the war was being fought there were severe food shortages at home, however the government sent food provisions to replenish troops at the front line, whilst cities food supplies were severely low.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    that the bourgeois government was not suitable for the new Russian republic. Not only did the Provisional Government have to contend with the opposing Petrograd Soviet, as head of state they were responsible for dealing with the new democracy. They were faced with some tough decisions that would greatly influence the Government's popularity.

  2. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    He edited and organised the Bolsheviks paper and propaganda. He worked closely with Alexander Shlyapnikov and together they helped organize the strikes that resulted in the February Revolution. Molotov also became a member of the Military Revolutionary Committee that planned the October Revolution. Russia was a country of classes, within the classes were tight bonds' but between the classes was harsh conflict.

  1. To what extent did Lenin's legacy leave the Bolshevik party in a vibrant and ...

    People from within the party were concerned with Lenin's action as seen by what Maxim Gorky, one of the Bolshevik party's leading intellectuals at the time, said 'The best Rusians have lived for almost 100 years with the idea of a Constituent Assembly as a political organ which could provide

  2. To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? ...

    This strife lead to Russians beginning to lose support for the government in place. They felt betrayed seeing as the government regarded the Soviets Address to the people of the whole world as nonsense. Making their views feel unheard and rejected.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work