• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Mary I successful in her attempt to re-impose Catholicism in England?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Mary I successful in her attempt to re-impose Catholicism in England? Traditionalists have seen Mary's reign as a failure; they believed that Protestantism was far too embedded and people wouldn't accept Catholicism and the reversal of the Reformation, which was quite popular and strong, would cause a huge disaster. However, the Marian Reformation was, unexpectedly, quite successful. Mary, aided by her cousin Cardinal Pole, brought back Catholic doctrines and rituals, including the Mass, brought back the papal headship and crushed opposition from Protestants. In spite of this, Mary's inability to produce an heir brought the Protestant Princess Elizabeth came to the throne after her death in November 1558, which ended her Catholic Reformation. Mary's Reformation was quite popular, as there wasn't much opposition towards it. At her accession there was much rejoicing and enthusiasm, this shows that people were happy to have Mary as Queen and accepted her. As many Protestants saw her accession as God's verdict on their failures; most either conformed to the changes or went abroad. Just four bishops - Cranmer, Latimer, Ridley and Hooper - refused to recognise Catholicism and they were later all burned at stake for this. ...read more.

Middle

Approximately, 224 were burnt at the stake over the next three years and it was the most serious religious persecution in English history. The burnings were serious and gruesome and there were at least five burnings per month, over a 44 month period. Those burnt were mainly lesser men and were mostly from Norwich and London. Most of England didn't any burnings. The burnings were of laity who were zealous heretics, usually preachers; they had been convicted more than once. Mary was one of the driving forces behind the persecution; however it was also employed by bishops including Bishop Bonner of London. They believed that a small group of wicked men had led England to Protestantism, in the hopes of misleading the nation, and they had to burn them at stake in order to save the Church from them and other heretics, as the Catholic Church had been teaching for centuries. By 1555, there was powerful Protestant opinion around, especially in London and other parts of the south east and Mary's regime would have been failing its spiritual duty if it turned a blind eye towards it. Only four bishops were executed and none of the victims were of noble or gentry status; there were very few Protestant martyrs from the ruling classes. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the people of England seemed to have a lot of respect for the government and unity was large between people, therefore they Church of England was run by the monarch who was aided by a bench of bishops. Most people agreed with the government's policies, when faced with religious disagreement. Nonetheless, it is very clear that if Mary had lived longer, or had an heir, then the English Church would have remained Catholic for a much longer period and would have been successful, like the most of Mary's reign, despite the loss of Calais to the French. Much Protestantism would have remained but the Protestants would have been powerless and wouldn't have been able to challenge the Catholic Church; most Protestants would have conformed or left England to escape persecution, like most other Protestants. Protestant rebellions against the Catholic Church weren't popular, as proved with Wyatt's rebellion and the burning at stake of the 224 heretics. The Church was very popular, moderate and traditional which gave it widespread attractiveness. Mary's reign was seen as a triumph; she had easily restored Catholic beliefs and rituals to the English Church and had even brought back the papal headship. Her Catholic Reformation was genuinely popular and had little opposition. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was the Henrican Reformation imposed from 'above'?

    prayers would reduce the days spent in purgatory or collected for the local saint. They gave lay folk a considerable amount of status within the community and the guild often employed its own priests to carry out religious services. In fact membership was actually increasing before the Reformation, take for

  2. 'Without the Divorce Crisis, there would not have been a Henrician Reformation.' Discuss.

    Some historians however argue: "the reformation would have happened when it did even if the divorce had not been an issue". The attacks made on the church allowed the reformation to occur. Edward Hall suggests that Henry and his parliament, were backing up public statements from all over the country, letting the Pope know of the anti-clericalism within the country.

  1. Using all the sources, and your own knowledge, assess the extent to which Marys ...

    had been spent and the nobility would not give up on their own interests. Mary's religious acts had to be passed through Parliament and thus she was forced to agree that their privileges would not be affected by the return of the Church to Rome.

  2. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    fewer limitations, but did not have as broad an effect as the legal reforms would have, and again can be criticised as being for the benefit of the government and the army above all else. A smaller, better trained and more well educated army was the aim, and Alexander?s Minister

  1. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    With so many influential reformist people surrounding Henry, perhaps reform was inevitable from the outset. However, it could be suggested that the church was in need of reform and religious reformation had been inevitable for a long time. According to G.R.Elton Luther's impact in England came early and began to

  2. In what ways and to what extent does the concept of Spain's 'Golden Age' ...

    Overall, there was never enough income for Philip to deal with the financial difficulties of his reign, and he was never able to fully pay back his borrowings. Philip had little military success, but managed to increase his empire by a large amount.

  1. The Henrician Reformation.

    Many of the people liked the idea that English churches were controlled by the English people and therefore this politically favoured both the King and nationalists in England. When looking at the motives behind the reformation Cromwell and Cramner had a great deal of influence in Henry's decisions as the King respected them.

  2. How Successful was Edward Carson in His Defense of Unionism During The Third Home ...

    On the 23rd September 1911 50,000 men attended from Orange Lodges and Unionist clubs across the province. At this meeting, Carson gave a passionate speech in which he states a programme which would defeat the governments ?nefarious conspiracy? and that ?We must be prepared?.the morning Home Rule passes, ourselves to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work