• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Napoleon an enlightened despot?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Napoleon an enlightened despot? The various views on Napoleon's rule are constantly the subject of debate among historians. He has, of course, been described an enlightened despot, but also as a military dictator and the Saviour of France. Although Napoleons rule changed somewhat throughout his reign, his increasingly authoritarian reforms, actions and statements, coupled with an arguable regard for many Revolutionary principles, point to the conclusion that he was indeed an enlightened despot, but the other interpretations are also viable. "I am the Revolution"- Napoleon The term enlightened despot refers to the 18th century absolute monarchs who were influenced by the ideas of the Revolution. Absolute rule means that very few of no institutions are used to govern, with little or no system of 'checks and balances' on the power of the ruler. The term also heavily relies on the style and substance of Napoleons rule. If it can accurately be used to describe it, he must have continually upheld the principles of the Revolution. Napoleon increasingly, employed just the kind of absolute rule imposed by the enlightened despots, more so after his self-coronation in 1804. As first consul in the original constitution Napoleon had supreme power of veto over the 2nd and 3rd consuls and the members of the legislative bodies. ...read more.

Middle

He did not call for universal manhood suffrage, nor did he govern by means of popular sovereignty, by acting as the people indicated through elected officials. The enlightenment also called for rational and uniform government and administration. While here Napoleon could easily be criticised for the harsh nature of rule, Ellis comments on its "uniformity throughout and well-ordered hierarchy of status", especially when compared to the 'muddled' years of the Directory. In his law of April 1803, Napoleon introduced graded salaries for all public officials, and also the adoption of pensions, in this way he created a system where salary and promotion depended more on merit than seniority. One way in which Napoleon brought uniformity and equality was in his reform of the law, another Revolutionary idea. Before the Consulate, French law differed in the various regions and provinces, thus making equality before law impossible, since a persons actions could be deemed legal in one place and illegal elsewhere. Napoleon used his Codes for civil and criminal procedure, commerce and punishment to provide exactly the kind of uniformity the Directory had tried and failed to create. Here Napoleon can be praised for successfully upholding the Revolution in his rule, since he promoted government uniformity equality before the law. Napoleon also abolished feudalism throughout France. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is also clear that Napoleon did not allow freedom of censorship and press in France, as he stifled all aspects off free press from the outset of his reign. Overall, Napoleon can be seen to uphold the principles, but mainly those with which he benefited by personally. For instance he made Catholicism legal, ensuring religious tolerance, but he did so in return of the loyalty of the Bishops. Also, he did indeed promote education, but only to the sons of the military people on whose support he relied, and who of course he would need for his future battles and conquests. Napoleon's claim that he was acting in the people's interest is also flawed, since he felt the need to fake plebiscites to show just how much he was adored. His uniform codes are, as Napoleon himself has proclaimed, part of his legacy, and in these he can be commended, apart from his blatant sexism, which did not give women the same rights as men in front of a court of law. In conclusion, while Napoleon can be hailed most certainly as a Despot, ruling with absolute and complete power in every aspect of French life, he can only be termed as enlightened as something which suited him politically, and was not necessarily terribly important to the man himself. Miss Jeremy Napoleon Oliver Quaye 13.3 Dec 2002 1 A2 History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * These casualties sometimes, as at Marengo, Ulm, Austerlitz and Jena, numbered three times as many as those suffered by the French. This strategy was new. Guibert had proposed this strategy years earlier, but as Napoleon put it, "everything is in the execution", thus we cannot belittle his brilliance. iv)

  2. To what extent had Napoleon betrayed the French Revolution in his domestic policy by ...

    Napoleon holds even more resemblance to a modern dictator when we look at his schemes of propaganda. He censored many newspapers, and they were also forbidden from discussing anything which may go against Napoleon's rule, or anything too controversial which Napoleon didn't like.

  1. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    Another feature of the Constitution of 1802 was Napoleon's 'Legion of Honour'. This was an elitist organisation created to bind powerful men to Napoleon's regime through patronage - a system of rewards and titles, bribery. In being elitist, the Legion of Honour proved as a betrayal of the revolutionary principles;

  2. To what extent did Napoleon enjoy support within France?

    - No organized opposition was tolerated. The number of newspapers was reduced drastically. The ones remaining were heavily censored. Free journalism of the kind that existed in 1789 gave way to government press releases. By 1811 only four newspapers remained in Paris, all toed the official line.

  1. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    Prior to the losses in the Peninsula the Grande Arm´┐Że had an image of invincibility, especially when commanded by Napoleon, but their activities in Spain undermined this, and showed the other continental powers that France could be beaten. It was a major factor in Austria taking up arms again in 1812 and gave them the confidence to take on Napoleon.

  2. How far did Napoleon Bonaparte maintain the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality in ...

    However, his attitude towards the Jews was not a positive one. According to J.M Thompson, Napoleon associated the 'charity' of the New Testament with Catholicism and the 'cruelty' of the Old Testament with Judaism. He shared the common Catholic dislike of the Jews.

  1. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    on any legislation passed by the Senate (to prevent a dictatorship), became increasingly unimportant in the later years of Napoleon?s rule. The Tribunate was purged in 1802 to prevent any opposition to his regime, whilst Napoleon elected new, loyal members for the Legislature.

  2. Was Napoleon a dictator?

    Thirdly, many areas jut sent in unanimous votes or were intimidated in to voting that way. It is important to remember that the plebiscites took place after Napoleon had introduced the reforms so has do influence on the decision. They were simply approval and most likely acted as a disguise for his authoritarian nature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work