• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Napoleons generalship the main reason for his military success in Europe to 1807?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Napoleon's generalship the main reason for his military success in Europe to 1807? Napoleon was one of the greatest military leaders that Europe has ever seen. His leadership of the French army saw France control most of continental Europe. Up to 1807 Napoleon was feared throughout due to his military successes. In order to establish whether the reason for his military successes was his generalship, one must also look at other reasons for his military success. Napoleon possessed many skills that assisted him in his generalship. When he came to power he reorganised the army. He divided it into corps of 25,000 to 30,000 men; each had specific roles in battle. This gave his army more flexibility, which would be a main feature in his successes. Napoleon himself controlled the whole army, and with the flexibility of his corps, meant the army was quick to respond to orders. Napoleon decided every move his army made on the battlefield. He formulated general plans of action before any battle and calculated all the chances accurately. This organisation meant Napoleon had full control of how his army fought, and because of his great military mind this led to successes. ...read more.


The mobility of his army allowed him to do this well. For example, at Ulm in 1805, having made a mistake, he improvised by making a quick decision to send marshal Murat in pursuit of the Austrians, which reduced their numbers from 70,000 to 27,000 and was key to his success there. Another aspect of his great generalship was that he played to his strengths. Napoleon never fought naval battles, as it wasn't his thing and he'd had a weak navy. Evidently Napoleon had many aspects to his generalship, which had huge impacts on his military successes up to 1807. Now it is important to look at another reason to why he was successful. The strength of the French army he inherited is another reason to why Napoleon was so successful. Napoleon was able to change the nature of warfare to 'levee on masse', since due to conscription (introduced in 1793 before Napoleon came to power) he had a huge army, which consisted of 600,000 by 1805. This was significantly larger than any other army in Europe, and was an obvious advantage for Napoleon. Napoleon could deliver huge casualties to his enemies and not have to worry about losing similar numbers himself. ...read more.


There failure to create a successful coalition can be seen with the Second Coalition of 1799 between Britain, Russia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire. The problem with it was that every country wanted something different from the coalition and it consisted of a series of separate alliances. It broke down as Britain and Russia fell out over Malta. However Napoleon must take some credit from the failures of coalitions due to his intervention through his policy of 'divide and rule'. This consisted of Napoleon trying to break down coalitions by dealing with each member separately. Once Britain and Russia had fallen out in the Second Coalition, it allowed Napoleon to intervene and get Russia on side. He was then able to bully Austria into signing the Peace of Luneville. So clearly the weakness of the opposition assisted Napoleon in his successes, although it must be seen that he capitalised on them brilliantly. It must be seen that the most important factor was Napoleons generalship. Although factors such as the army he inherited, and other peoples tactics assisted him. Without the weaknesses of the opposition, the army would have not enjoyed so many military successes. It was Napoleons leadership of the army that brought all the factors together and allowed him to be so successful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Interpretation B mentions the end of feudalism with the Civil Code, ?While there is?social designs.? Interpretation B shows clearly that while Napoleon was greatly reforming regarding France, within the Empire?s subject states this reforming attitude was put second behind his need of the subject states for his military and dynastic ambitions.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Each was quite small, containing sometimes as few as 30,000 men, and the wars were normally undertaken with limited objectives such as the acquisition of a small province, more often than to be eventually used as a bargaining counter in maintaining the balance of power in the game of international diplomacy.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    In some ways, there was no real balance of power, and Adam Zamoyski argues that Britain emerged vastly stronger and invulnerable, while Austria was highly vulnerable, and entirely dependent on the good-will of her neighbours.51 Austria's financial and military resources were inadequate to defend against likely challenges from France and

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    hand somewhat, ruling out an already unpractical plan to invade Britain, the destruction of a weak French and Spanish fleet cannot be seen as one of the major factors in Napoleon's downfall. Far more important than their military contribution was Britain's political and economic support for the mainland powers opposing Napoleon.

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Trotsky does concede that the terror increased in stature daily, but he attributes this to Stalin's attitude by saying 'Stalin is like a man who tries to quench his thirst with salted water'19 A number of those who knew Stalin personally look to his persona to explain the Purges.

  2. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    If Davout had been in Waterloo with Napoleon, it is definite that Napoleon would have been victorious. Early June, the English and Prussian began to amass. On June 14, Napoleon left Paris at three o'clock in the morning hoping to make a swift advance before the Russians and Austrians could

  1. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    * Right to education, equality: Napoleon drew upon the ?right to be educated? which was first stated in the Declaration of Rights, 1793. He provided primary schools (run by the church) which taught simple ?moral education? and basic literacy and numeracy.

  2. To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from ...

    necessary precondition.? Religious explanations of the witch-hunts have been some of the earliest attempts by modern scholars to comprehend the bizarre phenomenon of the Early Modern Period. Among the first was that of Historian Hugh Trevor Roper, who advocated the idea that the witch trials emerged as part of the conflicts between Roman Catholics and Protestants in Early Modern Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work