• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Napoleons generalship the main reason for his military success in Europe to 1807?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Napoleon's generalship the main reason for his military success in Europe to 1807? Napoleon was one of the greatest military leaders that Europe has ever seen. His leadership of the French army saw France control most of continental Europe. Up to 1807 Napoleon was feared throughout due to his military successes. In order to establish whether the reason for his military successes was his generalship, one must also look at other reasons for his military success. Napoleon possessed many skills that assisted him in his generalship. When he came to power he reorganised the army. He divided it into corps of 25,000 to 30,000 men; each had specific roles in battle. This gave his army more flexibility, which would be a main feature in his successes. Napoleon himself controlled the whole army, and with the flexibility of his corps, meant the army was quick to respond to orders. Napoleon decided every move his army made on the battlefield. He formulated general plans of action before any battle and calculated all the chances accurately. This organisation meant Napoleon had full control of how his army fought, and because of his great military mind this led to successes. ...read more.


The mobility of his army allowed him to do this well. For example, at Ulm in 1805, having made a mistake, he improvised by making a quick decision to send marshal Murat in pursuit of the Austrians, which reduced their numbers from 70,000 to 27,000 and was key to his success there. Another aspect of his great generalship was that he played to his strengths. Napoleon never fought naval battles, as it wasn't his thing and he'd had a weak navy. Evidently Napoleon had many aspects to his generalship, which had huge impacts on his military successes up to 1807. Now it is important to look at another reason to why he was successful. The strength of the French army he inherited is another reason to why Napoleon was so successful. Napoleon was able to change the nature of warfare to 'levee on masse', since due to conscription (introduced in 1793 before Napoleon came to power) he had a huge army, which consisted of 600,000 by 1805. This was significantly larger than any other army in Europe, and was an obvious advantage for Napoleon. Napoleon could deliver huge casualties to his enemies and not have to worry about losing similar numbers himself. ...read more.


There failure to create a successful coalition can be seen with the Second Coalition of 1799 between Britain, Russia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire. The problem with it was that every country wanted something different from the coalition and it consisted of a series of separate alliances. It broke down as Britain and Russia fell out over Malta. However Napoleon must take some credit from the failures of coalitions due to his intervention through his policy of 'divide and rule'. This consisted of Napoleon trying to break down coalitions by dealing with each member separately. Once Britain and Russia had fallen out in the Second Coalition, it allowed Napoleon to intervene and get Russia on side. He was then able to bully Austria into signing the Peace of Luneville. So clearly the weakness of the opposition assisted Napoleon in his successes, although it must be seen that he capitalised on them brilliantly. It must be seen that the most important factor was Napoleons generalship. Although factors such as the army he inherited, and other peoples tactics assisted him. Without the weaknesses of the opposition, the army would have not enjoyed so many military successes. It was Napoleons leadership of the army that brought all the factors together and allowed him to be so successful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Interpretation C, while shown as an interpretation that agrees with the view, does show some benefits offered by Napoleon, ?The methods?Restoration governments.? As mentioned in interpretation D, the Napoleonic Empire helped to lay the foundation for future governments to use successfully.

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    The opposition of Britain can be seen as a long term cause of Napoleon's downfall, without directly forcing his defeat. The mere existence of Britain as a threat galled Napoleon throughout his regime; as early as 1803 he is quoted as having said "the English want war, but if they

  1. Napoleon came to power in France due to his skills as a soldier" To ...

    This made the people of France see Bonaparte as an alternative of the Directory at that time as no one supported the new government. Together with his military accomplishments such as the battle in Italy and Egypt, Napoleon created a wonderful image of himself by means of propaganda.

  2. To what extent did victory or defeat in war in the period 1792-1918 depend ...

    Despite evolving to supporting the defender due to increased technology, tactics were equally important during the German Wars of Unification. One example that highlights the importance of tactics over numbers of soldiers and weapons was at Konnigratz in 1866 where the Prussians used battlefield concentration, converging multiple units at the

  1. To What Extent was Napoleon Master of Europe

    Religion was a huge factor in France's daily troubles. Therefore Napoleon decided to reconcile the differences between the religions. The main reason for such a rivalry between the religions was that, during the revolution, France was "de-Christianised." Millions of Catholic's were outraged at such a move.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon's success in Europe to 1807 the consequences of his ...

    Apart from the fact that they were treated like criminals, Russian soldiers were also poorly trained, severely lacking in tactical awareness and education. Prussia on the other hand, with its fine tradition, had a very strong army. However, the Prussian skirmishes were poor and the army missed a sense of individuality (instinct or initiative)

  1. How successful was Napoleon III?

    Ministers were now made accountable to the Corps Legislatif and so they had to have a majority in it supporting them. Therefore because of all of this it seemed that Napoleon III had achieved the smooth transition from a dictatorship to a form of government which was very popular amongst the elites as it shared power with them.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    * Life Consul, Emperor: Napoleon?s rule became progressively authoritarian with the creation of the 1802 and 1804 constitutions. The constitution of the Year X, using plebiscites to appear democratic, ensured his position as Life Consul which further cemented the power firmly in his hands.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work