• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Napoleons generalship the main reason for his military success in Europe to 1807?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Napoleon's generalship the main reason for his military success in Europe to 1807? Napoleon was one of the greatest military leaders that Europe has ever seen. His leadership of the French army saw France control most of continental Europe. Up to 1807 Napoleon was feared throughout due to his military successes. In order to establish whether the reason for his military successes was his generalship, one must also look at other reasons for his military success. Napoleon possessed many skills that assisted him in his generalship. When he came to power he reorganised the army. He divided it into corps of 25,000 to 30,000 men; each had specific roles in battle. This gave his army more flexibility, which would be a main feature in his successes. Napoleon himself controlled the whole army, and with the flexibility of his corps, meant the army was quick to respond to orders. Napoleon decided every move his army made on the battlefield. He formulated general plans of action before any battle and calculated all the chances accurately. This organisation meant Napoleon had full control of how his army fought, and because of his great military mind this led to successes. ...read more.


The mobility of his army allowed him to do this well. For example, at Ulm in 1805, having made a mistake, he improvised by making a quick decision to send marshal Murat in pursuit of the Austrians, which reduced their numbers from 70,000 to 27,000 and was key to his success there. Another aspect of his great generalship was that he played to his strengths. Napoleon never fought naval battles, as it wasn't his thing and he'd had a weak navy. Evidently Napoleon had many aspects to his generalship, which had huge impacts on his military successes up to 1807. Now it is important to look at another reason to why he was successful. The strength of the French army he inherited is another reason to why Napoleon was so successful. Napoleon was able to change the nature of warfare to 'levee on masse', since due to conscription (introduced in 1793 before Napoleon came to power) he had a huge army, which consisted of 600,000 by 1805. This was significantly larger than any other army in Europe, and was an obvious advantage for Napoleon. Napoleon could deliver huge casualties to his enemies and not have to worry about losing similar numbers himself. ...read more.


There failure to create a successful coalition can be seen with the Second Coalition of 1799 between Britain, Russia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire. The problem with it was that every country wanted something different from the coalition and it consisted of a series of separate alliances. It broke down as Britain and Russia fell out over Malta. However Napoleon must take some credit from the failures of coalitions due to his intervention through his policy of 'divide and rule'. This consisted of Napoleon trying to break down coalitions by dealing with each member separately. Once Britain and Russia had fallen out in the Second Coalition, it allowed Napoleon to intervene and get Russia on side. He was then able to bully Austria into signing the Peace of Luneville. So clearly the weakness of the opposition assisted Napoleon in his successes, although it must be seen that he capitalised on them brilliantly. It must be seen that the most important factor was Napoleons generalship. Although factors such as the army he inherited, and other peoples tactics assisted him. Without the weaknesses of the opposition, the army would have not enjoyed so many military successes. It was Napoleons leadership of the army that brought all the factors together and allowed him to be so successful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    own mechanizations, ?The ideals of?social designs.? As the interpretation suggests, Napoleon only uses his subjects as a means of funding his military and fiscal needs. Likewise, newly acquired nations were used to extend his Bonaparte dynasty across Europe, which is evident by the appointment of Napoleon?s ineffective sister as the king of turbulent Spain.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Each was quite small, containing sometimes as few as 30,000 men, and the wars were normally undertaken with limited objectives such as the acquisition of a small province, more often than to be eventually used as a bargaining counter in maintaining the balance of power in the game of international diplomacy.

  1. To what extent was Napoleon an enlightened despot?

    While Napoleon can be seen to have promoted education, his belief that everyday people need simply 'moral education', shows that his concerns lay with the few and not the many. Napoleon only promoted education to the sons of the wealthy and the military, and even then this was purely at

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    hand somewhat, ruling out an already unpractical plan to invade Britain, the destruction of a weak French and Spanish fleet cannot be seen as one of the major factors in Napoleon's downfall. Far more important than their military contribution was Britain's political and economic support for the mainland powers opposing Napoleon.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    However, the Saxon minister Georg von Greisinger notes that 'of all the plenipotentiaries who were called to this congress, there is but a very small number who have left satisfied.'50 This would indicate that the Settlement largely failed, as the Great powers were unsatisfied and therefore would be likely to cause problems in the future.

  2. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    Grouchy was ordered to stop the Prussian army-reaching waterloo. He had 33000 men, the Prussians amassed to only 15000. The men grouchy had, could've been used with great affect if he had used some initiative. However he did not, so they were not.

  1. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    economic and political stability which had not been seen during the revolution. Moreover, in previous years the threat of opposition had always troubled government and clearly led to collapse of the executive, thus naturally any regime would take some action to prevent any conspirators.

  2. To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from ...

    According to Hugh Trevor Roper, Protestant states executed their Catholic minorities, and vice versa. Witch-hunting was a facade; a means for secular and Religious authorities to execute members of the opposing confession in large numbers, thereby showing their ?Godliness.? This policy was implemented during times of peace, when Religious wars

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work