• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was opposition from politicians responsible for the failures of the civil rights campaigns between 1945 -1955?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent was opposition from politicians responsible for the failures of the civil rights campaigns between 1945 -1955? Between 1945 and 1955 politicians failed to help the civil rights campaigns giving African Americans equal rights. For instances while some politicians claimed to support the civil rights movement, they failed to actually implement any direct action towards making equal rights possible. Furthermore Southern politicians who were very pro segregation slowed down the process of civil rights campaigns being turned into law by congress. However Politicians weren?t always responsible for the failures of civil rights campaigns such as in Morgan V Virginia. While this case led to the banning of segregation on interstate busses, the de jure change didn?t always lead to a de facto change; therefore this type of segregation was still carried out in practise. There were a few political factors responsible for the prevention of civil rights campaigns. The most obvious was the opposition from the south towards Truman?s attempts to give African Americans equal rights to white citizens. Southern democrats disliked Truman?s policies such as the formation of the NECP in 1941, therefore they decided to set up their own Dixiecrat party and pick their own democrat candidate Strom Thurman to go against Truman in the 1948 election. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore the problem of few pickets was made worse by the closing down of NAACPs offices in the south. This caused more failures for the civil rights campaign?s as the NAACP who had organised the New Orleans protest were now unable to organize any protests at all. The most ineffective method of protest was that of COREs journey of reconciliation. White citizens sat in black areas and vice versa showed that the decision of 1946 Morgan V Virginia banning segregation on interstate busses was not being carried out. While the protest highlighted that while African Americans had de jure rights they didn?t enjoy them in practise. However on the other hand this could be responsible for the failures of civil rights campaigns as like NAACPs protests it failed to force southern states to actually make desegregation on interstate busses a de facto change. Legal factors were also an important cause for the failures of the civil rights campaigns. While African Americans had progressed with the help of the NAACP these only amounted to de jure victories. Plessey V Ferguson had been overturned by the supreme court saying that separate but equal was against the constitution, yet it was still being practised throughout America, especially in the racist south. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is because despite not being able to prevent African Americans from gaining civil rights they did manage to limit it greatly. In the Brown case, despite the supreme court deeming segregation in schools against the constitution, southern politicians such as Governor Faubus still refused to implement desegregation, only then giving black citizens rights when the federal army was called in. Furthermore southern politicians in congress made sure policies advancing civil rights didn?t get through, and therefore the ones that were put in place didn?t go far enough to deal with the inequality throughout America. However Legal factors such as de jure victories not being made into de facto changes also severely hindered the civil rights campaign. This is because although African Americans were finally been granted the same rights as white people by the Supreme Court, they were still unable to enjoy them. The racist south, where discrimination was widespread found ways such as the grandfather clause and literacy tests keep black people as second class citizens as opposed to equals. This when paired with racist groups such as the KKK kept African Americans down through terror making black citizens less likely to campaign for their rights as seen in the lack of protests during 1945 ? 1955. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    Both acts were somewhat weak, merely reiterating previous rulings, and setting up committees to investigate civil rights abuses. The weakness of these acts shows the continued influence of racist southern Democrats in Congress - the acts had been somewhat stronger, but would not pass without the support of the southern

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    What was achieved by people such as Rosa Parks56 and King in the Civil Rights Acts of 196457 and 196858 and the Voting Rights act of 196559 went against what many advocates of Black Power and Malcolm X were aiming for.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Essay on civil rights

    3 star(s)

    Thus resulting in many Black individuals remaining illiterate. Moreover, the strict control over the infrastructure made opportunities for them that much more harder for joining groups such as Trade Unions was bared, knowing the great influence they could cause if they were given any power.

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    They found it hard to register to vote, usually by intimidation but sometimes by forcing them to pass a test in order to vote. They were terrorised by the local Ku Klux Klan, and could expect little protection from the police.

  1. How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the ...

    New Deal with the "Social Security Act, Rural electrification"27 and also National Labour Relations Act consequently quietening opposition of the New Deal. It is clear that they were too radical to go beyond the New Deal; it must also be considered that the New Deal created 6 million Jobs, yet

  2. The question that will be investigated is, to what extent was the case of ...

    Firstly, the landmark case did not abolish segregation in public areas such as restaurants. Also, Brown v Board of Education did not give a timeline for integration. However, this case showed that the Constitution was on the side of racial equality and led to the massive integration movement and other landmark cases.

  1. How far was Martin Luther King's leadership responsible for the gains made by the ...

    Both Congress and The Supreme Court had a significant impact towards the gains made by the civil right movement. Congress?s support was essential for progress in terms of civil rights legislation. It was thought that this support would not be easy to obtain due to the overpowering voice of the southern states within congress.

  2. How far were the forces opposed to civil rights responsible for the failure of ...

    White members were excluded as certain groups such as SNCC decided that they preferred the separatist ideas promoted firstly by Marcus Garvey in the early 20th century, adopted by the Nation of Islam and Malcolm X later on. They protested their constitutional ?right to bear arms? and this could be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work