• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Puritanism a threat to church and state 1558-1603?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Puritanism a threat to church and state 1558-1603? In order to answer the question, one must firstly ascertain what actually constituted a Puritan. The name Puritan was actually a kind of slur; it was a label to abuse those who were into the repression of certain indulgences of the period. Such a term must therefore be handled with care, Puritanism was not a unified movement, there were different sects in amongst them who shared certain beliefs as the most moderate of Puritans but also had a totally independent interpretation of other issues. There were the Separatists, according to AGR Smith a 'tiny and unrepresentative minority' and the Presbyterians. In simple terms Puritans were Protestants who believed the reformation hadn't gone far enough. Russell called them 'hotter' Protestants. A hallmark which put fear into the State was the anti-hierarchical beliefs held by many Puritans. ...read more.


Geoffrey Elton disputes this interpretation. He claims Neale did not do enough research. Despite this, calls for reform and effective preaching did find support even at the highest levels; in the government itself in fact some of the Privy Councillors were very sympathetic Protestants. This was especially true when the council believed the country was under threat from an anti Protestant force, be it national or international. Certain interpretations suggest that Elizabeth caused the dispute with the Conformist Puritans herself. It seems she believed religion was just another tool for the crown to maintain stability. Her dislike of Prophesyings because of their threat to the crown started the downfall of the previously largely successful Archbishop Grindal. By this time, some previously moderate Protestants were following the outspoken Cartwright into Presbyterianism. So in this instance she shot herself in the foot. If she hadn't been so immovable in her opposition to the meetings fewer people would have been forced into the more extreme position. ...read more.


Perhaps this threatened the position of the state and the church; however there is much evidence to suggest personal apathy on the part of the population as regards religion. This is understandable considering the yo-yoing of doctrines over the years previously. When standing in the shoes of the Queen or one of the key Bishops, Puritanism with all its faces including Separatism, Conformism, Presbyterianism, could have posed a huge threat to the stability of the Church and State which they had worked so hard to secure. However when standing in the shoes of a provincial puritan the actions of the crown to squash their actions would have probably seemed a hideous over reaction. The only concrete fear they could have legitimately had was the removal of the hierarchical system. As Russell states these made up a tiny minority of the Protestant minority. Mad outbursts like that of William Cattner(?) pretending to be the Messiah did not help the Protestant cause but they can not really be claimed as threats to the throne as the Queen got justice, the pretender lost his life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    The next major threat was in 1570 when Thomas Cartwright lectured at Cambridge demanding a Presbyterian system, publicly speaking out against the Religious Settlement. As a Presbyterian his influence was not great; however, the fact that he was criticising the establishment he belonged to meant it was taken seriously.

  2. The failure of Elizabethan Puritanism

    Something puritans were whole heartedly against. Puritans found the various traditional forms of worship offensive, and could not bring themselves to complying to the Church of England's and indeed Elizabeth's request for conformity. Such traditions like clerical vestments (particularly the surplice and the square cap), kneeling to receive the communion,

  1. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    In 1563, the bishops petitioned Convocation on issues such as the abolition of holy days, the abolition of organ music, and the surplice could be accepted as sufficient for most services, and were only defeated by one vote, showing the strength for these reforming views within the Church, and the problems that could have faced Elizabeth.

  2. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    He was very friendly and was open to anyone and everyone being his friend if they so wished. He became popular in Salinas (except for the incident with the lettuce) very quickly. Adam didn't read people very well though. He understood his own emotions, but when it came time to

  1. To what extent was the Henrican Reformation imposed from 'above'?

    The circle around the King certainly included men who were interested to religious reform. Thomas Cromwell in particular used his position as vice-regent to the full. He helped pass a series of statutes that had a sideway glance in the direction of Protestantism.

  2. In 1603, when Elizabeth died, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the church ...

    When Elizabeth died, the strengths of the church, which she left to James I with regards to both Puritans and Catholics, were: that the puritans held "impossibly high standards" of what they considered to be a 'true' and 'godly' Church.

  1. Were the Puritans a threat to Elizabeth?

    This suggests that they were in fact a threat to Elizabeth, and the fact that it states they were "killing all Catholics" implies that perhaps they were not only a threat to Elizabeth, but to the Catholics as well. Nevertheless, the Spanish Ambassador, who was Catholic and therefore biased against the Puritans anyway, wrote the source.

  2. Identify and explain what affected the power of Elizabeth I between 1558 and 1603. ...

    It required the use of a Book of Common Prayer in all churches and provided a system of punishment for those who failed to use it or publicly objected to it. However, Elizabeth?s Religious Settlement did not necessarily diminish the threat posed by religion, particularly Catholicism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work