• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Richard III responsible for his insecurity as King?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Richard III responsible for his insecurity as King? Richard III is one of the most controversial monarchs who history has seen fit to label a monstrous villain. Most of this is due to Shakespeare?s play ?Richard III? who portrayed him as evil personified as well as the Tudor propaganda, which has influenced our perception of him. There have been many historians, who are dedicated to clearing his name, yet in the reverse many propose to expose his vicious crimes. However, of how much of his insecurity was his own fault. Was Richard III completely to blame for the outcome of controversy to his name! Richard is probably best well known for the rumours about his involvement in the killing of the two princes ? his nephews. He declared the marriage of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville illegitimate and said that their two sons (heir to the throne) were ?bastards? before taking the throne for himself and murdering the boys. Much like 21st century the killing of children is greatly condemned and by doing this made him unpopular as a king. He made a serious error carrying out this plot and had little hope of holding onto the crown after his actions. ...read more.

Middle

It showed those around him that didn?t have the backing or the power to be able to stop the over-mighty subject. Again, this was only the fault of Richard himself. He gave Buckingham the power and literally set him up to be able to enforce a rebellion. Buckingham knew that Richard was in debt to him and could therefore push to get what he wanted knowing the king would not try to stop him. If Richard had been more forceful in dealing with this powerful noble it may have restored him some success. On the other hand, Richard had many strengths that aided him in reducing the amount of insecurity he had as king. During his reign Richard proved to be a capable and energetic king. In politics and government he was determined to stamp his authority on the kingdom by promising to outlaw corruption, restore peace and reform the legal system. By doing this he showed that he was putting in place actions which would make his country a better place ? this would have definitely got him a lot of credit. He also participated in government and moved around the kingdom to show himself to his subjects. ...read more.

Conclusion

Richard also took time to build amazingly structured halls, chapels and buildings. The way in which he embraced religion sent of a good message to his people ? it allowed them to look at him in a different light. By being accepted by the church and its followers gave Richard a guarded, strong support system as religion was a very powerful source! Overall, Richard did have a great input on his insecurities yet he did do many successful things, which helped to counteract them. Taking drastic measures, like killing the heir to the throne/his own nephews, meant that he lost A LOT of backing. Not only this but Henry Tudor and his foreign relations also aided him into feeling more insecure. Richard?s main problem was that he did not have a good following and this gave him great doubt and weakness throughout his reign. On the positive side he was an active outgoing king, with little opposition, yet he greatly lacked following (through his own fault) which diminished all value of his good deeds. If he had have had assistance from his people, doubled with his success, he could have been a great king! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    Their conversation in Act 1 Scene 3, before Margaret interrupts, is laden with double meanings and subtle jabs; as she says to him 'come, come, we know your meaning, brother Gloucester.' Foreshadowing is also present in this scene. In her conversation with her kinsmen before Richard enters, Elizabeth seems to predict the harm, which Richard intends towards her family.

  2. How effective was Richard III as King of England?

    He could not rely upon the Nobles who were involved with the government of Edward IV. He relied increasingly upon Northern gentry who he had gained the loyalty of during the reign of Edward IV.

  1. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    These were a few very powerful men scattered around the country whose support really mattered. This can be shown with the earl of Northumberland. Although he was instrumental in Richard's rise to power he wasn't given power over the North as he had expected, and was under the control of

  2. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    effect his chances of winning the battle so he prays for forgiveness on behalf of his father. Henry also, shows an overwhelming concern for what his men really think of his leadership qualities; "Instead of homage sweet, but poisoned flattery," Henry shows regard for what his men say about him behind his back.

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    However, as the new justice system began to evolve many quarrels between the King and the church, which festered and intensified following Henry's attempts to introduce the 'Constitutions of Clarendon' in 1164 caused emotions to escalate dramatically once � Beckett changed both mentally and spiritually, once he took up his

  2. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    This was a very important factor in letting Henry Tudor win as his army was very small and if Richard III had a big army then Henry Tudor would have been defeated and no doubt killed. Henry Tudors mother Margaret Beaufort was an important factor in Henry Tudor's victory at

  1. Discuss the relationship between Richard II and its source 'How kyng Richarde the seconde....'

    The strict, consistent rhyme scheme drives home the didactic message of the poem, as does the repeated use of alliteration, such as 'shame sueth sinne' (l.18). Shakespeare's Richard is a more complex, contradictory character, reflecting the theatrical purpose of the play.

  2. Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III?

    Richard's character, although we cannot be sure due to nearly all sources being affected by Tudor myth, was a deceitful one and reactions to him, shown by the immediate acceptance of Henry Tudor, can be seen as being negative. The nature of his usurpation shows him to be a strong

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work