• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death? Before Lenin's death in 1924 Stalin held many pointless positions which allowed him to build up his power but only by a tiny amount. During the Russian Civil War and Polish-Soviet War, Stalin was political commissar of the Red Army at various fronts. Stalin's first government position was as People's Commissar of Nationalities Affairs (1917-23). Also, he was People's Commissar of Workers and Peasants Inspection (1919-22), a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the republic (1920-23) and a member of the Central Executive Committee of the Congress of Soviets (from 1917). Stalin most important position was as General Secretary. This role in the party let Stalin build up a power base. At the Party Congress close to Lenin's, he used this position to be granted permission to expel "unsatisfactory" party members. This later enabled Stalin to remove thousands of supporters of Trotsky, his main rival for the leadership of the party. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin's Testament, with its warning against Stalin and suggestion that he be removed from leadership, was read at the next Central Committee meeting. This was a critical moment, if his rivals had demanded compliance with the testament at this point, Stalin would not have survived their attacks, even though he had a power base it was not yet large enough to withstand these attacks. However with luck on his side, Trotsky kept silent because the testament would also cause problems for him too, and Stalin's allies, Kamenev and Zinoviev, came to his defence. The following year, 1924, marks the beginning of Stalin's rise to power. At that point he was one of seven members of the Politburo. The others were Zinoviev and Kamenev, Trotsky, Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, and Mikhail Tomsky. Stalin's amazing success can be attributed to a combination of his own political genius and the mistakes that his rivals persisted in making. Luck may have been a massive part in Stalin acquisition of power but you cannot forget his political aptitude. In December 1924, Stalin first articulated his own twist on Marxist orthodoxy, which he termed "Socialism in One Country." ...read more.

Conclusion

Kalinin and Vorishilov joined the Politburo, and the suddenly weakened Kamenev and Zinoviev turned to Trotsky for support, forming a "United Opposition" in the summer of 1926. But they were no match for the Bukharin-Stalin alliance. By the time of the next Party Congress, in October of 1926, Zinoviev and Kamenev had been removed from the Politburo, and Stalin felt secure enough in his power to urge the Party's official repudiation of their views as "anti-Leninist." Trotsky resisted, and in 1927 he was expelled from the party and exiled to Central Asia; Zinoviev and Kamenev, defeated, begged for clemency, which the Politburo granted. Stalin was triumphant--now, even his ally in this struggle, Bukharin, grew nervous, as he realized that Stalin's power in the Party now overshadowed even his own influence. Overall there were many factors that helped Stalin's acquisition of power but I do not believe that the base of power he had before Lenin's death was the most important reason. Without luck or having the right political I am certain Stalin wouldn't have been able to build up so much power in such a short period of time, let alone survived Lenin's Testament. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tim Currie ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    This show of strength would have failed if the King had opposed it' (1 pg.

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    Their Hitler (1952) was a fanatical radical who rose to power because of the weakness of his political opponents, and not directly because of the economic crisis. However without the economic crisis, Hitler may never have become a politician with the ambition of once again creating a strong, powerful Germany

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Its membership came mainly from those who feared the rise of socialism; the labourers, small tenant farmers, farm managers and better off peasants. In post war Italy, the Socialist labour leagues had managed to organise the landless labourers and seize control of the farms.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    out his opposition, people lived in fear and didn't have enough courage to speak out. This had a huge shirt term effects on The Russian people, they lived in fear of Stalin and he could take advantage of this power.

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    He made a number of grave mistakes which ultimately led to Stalin's rise to power. Prior to his death, Lenin had grown increasingly worried about the power that Stalin was gaining and wrote in his testament about him "not being able to use power with sufficient caution."

  2. To what extent can Lenin be considered the begetter of Stalinism? Frank Carson - ...

    practiced in the early 20s, in which every member of the party was made to justify himself before a purge commission and defend against criticisms delivered openly from the floor or in secret, by denunciation. Parallels can be drawn between Stalin's use of the secret police against Trotskyists and similar

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Ideology and opinion in Stalin’s USSR: Stalin’s regime could rely on a certain amount of good will, generated by several factors ï 1. Regime associated itself with the idea of modernisation which was popular with many young people. 2. Soviet propaganda may have been successful in portraying the regime as the guardian of national security and patriotism.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Another important aspect is that the unemployed people joined the ��Labour Armies.�� Peasants had to give their surplus food to the government and they could not sell a profit, and private trading was banned. The government allowed money to lose its value through inflation, abolished rents, railway fares, postal charges and many other payments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work