• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death? Before Lenin's death in 1924 Stalin held many pointless positions which allowed him to build up his power but only by a tiny amount. During the Russian Civil War and Polish-Soviet War, Stalin was political commissar of the Red Army at various fronts. Stalin's first government position was as People's Commissar of Nationalities Affairs (1917-23). Also, he was People's Commissar of Workers and Peasants Inspection (1919-22), a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the republic (1920-23) and a member of the Central Executive Committee of the Congress of Soviets (from 1917). Stalin most important position was as General Secretary. This role in the party let Stalin build up a power base. At the Party Congress close to Lenin's, he used this position to be granted permission to expel "unsatisfactory" party members. This later enabled Stalin to remove thousands of supporters of Trotsky, his main rival for the leadership of the party. ...read more.


Lenin's Testament, with its warning against Stalin and suggestion that he be removed from leadership, was read at the next Central Committee meeting. This was a critical moment, if his rivals had demanded compliance with the testament at this point, Stalin would not have survived their attacks, even though he had a power base it was not yet large enough to withstand these attacks. However with luck on his side, Trotsky kept silent because the testament would also cause problems for him too, and Stalin's allies, Kamenev and Zinoviev, came to his defence. The following year, 1924, marks the beginning of Stalin's rise to power. At that point he was one of seven members of the Politburo. The others were Zinoviev and Kamenev, Trotsky, Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, and Mikhail Tomsky. Stalin's amazing success can be attributed to a combination of his own political genius and the mistakes that his rivals persisted in making. Luck may have been a massive part in Stalin acquisition of power but you cannot forget his political aptitude. In December 1924, Stalin first articulated his own twist on Marxist orthodoxy, which he termed "Socialism in One Country." ...read more.


Kalinin and Vorishilov joined the Politburo, and the suddenly weakened Kamenev and Zinoviev turned to Trotsky for support, forming a "United Opposition" in the summer of 1926. But they were no match for the Bukharin-Stalin alliance. By the time of the next Party Congress, in October of 1926, Zinoviev and Kamenev had been removed from the Politburo, and Stalin felt secure enough in his power to urge the Party's official repudiation of their views as "anti-Leninist." Trotsky resisted, and in 1927 he was expelled from the party and exiled to Central Asia; Zinoviev and Kamenev, defeated, begged for clemency, which the Politburo granted. Stalin was triumphant--now, even his ally in this struggle, Bukharin, grew nervous, as he realized that Stalin's power in the Party now overshadowed even his own influence. Overall there were many factors that helped Stalin's acquisition of power but I do not believe that the base of power he had before Lenin's death was the most important reason. Without luck or having the right political I am certain Stalin wouldn't have been able to build up so much power in such a short period of time, let alone survived Lenin's Testament. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tim Currie ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    This appeared to shoe equality and modernism but in fact it was a screen for Hitler's true incentives, without knowing this, the public would continue to support whom thy saw as an up and coming politician. The SA and the SS were described as 'support groups' and these members were composed largely of unemployed workers.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    a measure of economic liberalisation were implemented otherwise known as the NEP. In contrast, things became even worse for the workers under the NEP; some had called it the 'New Exploitation of the Proletariat'.30 They were less happy than the peasants due to a steep rise in unemployment in its first two years.

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    Lenin wrote extremely well of Trotsky describing him as "the most able man in the present Central Committee". After his death, there was a debate among the Communist Party as to whether or not Lenin's testament should have been published.

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    This strategy was notable as early as April 1919 when Fascist arditi (ex-servicemen) committed arson on the Milan Avanti! offices. Between 1920 and 1922 an estimated 2000 opponents were killed by Fascist squads, in most cases socialists. Therefore an interesting question to ask is if the weaknesses and divisions of opposition groups were strongly caused by Fascist violence.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Politicians Giovanni Giolitti attempted to create a stronger Italy in the decade before 1914 by reforming the politics; seeking cooperation and trying unite all social groups. However, in trying to please one group he upset another. Had he succeeded to create a unified Italy, people may have gained faith in

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    led to strikes, opposition from within the communists, the situation was critical. Lenin made the decision to abandon War Communism. War communism had both short term and long term effects, the killings and the food shortages although had great impact at the time didn't really effect Russia in the long run.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    2. In NEP Russia, much more art was free of communist ideology ï Lenin believed in ‘Art for Art’s sake’. Western films were more popular than Soviet films. In the 1930s, the State took more control of all aspects of media and culture.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The real question is why? Lenin was to run the government and to organise food and industrial production in the Red - area. It was mainly introduced because it was crucial to keep the Red Army supplied, so to keep this, Lenin adopted the policy of ��War Communism.�� We could consider a few aspects of War Communism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work