• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death? Before Lenin's death in 1924 Stalin held many pointless positions which allowed him to build up his power but only by a tiny amount. During the Russian Civil War and Polish-Soviet War, Stalin was political commissar of the Red Army at various fronts. Stalin's first government position was as People's Commissar of Nationalities Affairs (1917-23). Also, he was People's Commissar of Workers and Peasants Inspection (1919-22), a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the republic (1920-23) and a member of the Central Executive Committee of the Congress of Soviets (from 1917). Stalin most important position was as General Secretary. This role in the party let Stalin build up a power base. At the Party Congress close to Lenin's, he used this position to be granted permission to expel "unsatisfactory" party members. This later enabled Stalin to remove thousands of supporters of Trotsky, his main rival for the leadership of the party. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin's Testament, with its warning against Stalin and suggestion that he be removed from leadership, was read at the next Central Committee meeting. This was a critical moment, if his rivals had demanded compliance with the testament at this point, Stalin would not have survived their attacks, even though he had a power base it was not yet large enough to withstand these attacks. However with luck on his side, Trotsky kept silent because the testament would also cause problems for him too, and Stalin's allies, Kamenev and Zinoviev, came to his defence. The following year, 1924, marks the beginning of Stalin's rise to power. At that point he was one of seven members of the Politburo. The others were Zinoviev and Kamenev, Trotsky, Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, and Mikhail Tomsky. Stalin's amazing success can be attributed to a combination of his own political genius and the mistakes that his rivals persisted in making. Luck may have been a massive part in Stalin acquisition of power but you cannot forget his political aptitude. In December 1924, Stalin first articulated his own twist on Marxist orthodoxy, which he termed "Socialism in One Country." ...read more.

Conclusion

Kalinin and Vorishilov joined the Politburo, and the suddenly weakened Kamenev and Zinoviev turned to Trotsky for support, forming a "United Opposition" in the summer of 1926. But they were no match for the Bukharin-Stalin alliance. By the time of the next Party Congress, in October of 1926, Zinoviev and Kamenev had been removed from the Politburo, and Stalin felt secure enough in his power to urge the Party's official repudiation of their views as "anti-Leninist." Trotsky resisted, and in 1927 he was expelled from the party and exiled to Central Asia; Zinoviev and Kamenev, defeated, begged for clemency, which the Politburo granted. Stalin was triumphant--now, even his ally in this struggle, Bukharin, grew nervous, as he realized that Stalin's power in the Party now overshadowed even his own influence. Overall there were many factors that helped Stalin's acquisition of power but I do not believe that the base of power he had before Lenin's death was the most important reason. Without luck or having the right political I am certain Stalin wouldn't have been able to build up so much power in such a short period of time, let alone survived Lenin's Testament. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tim Currie ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    Their Hitler (1952) was a fanatical radical who rose to power because of the weakness of his political opponents, and not directly because of the economic crisis. However without the economic crisis, Hitler may never have become a politician with the ambition of once again creating a strong, powerful Germany

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power in 1923 – 9?

    too late He also led people to fear him by arguing that the future of Russia depended on the theory of permanent revolution. The people of Russia feared this would create new conflicts in the form of revolutions worldwide. This was the main theory of permanent revolution was this., Stalin

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    The testament was also Lenin's will and should've therefore been pressed by Trostsky. It wasn't however and the testament was shelved. Another mistake made by Trotsky was not turning up to Lenin's funeral. The funeral was a huge event in Leningrad where millions showed to mourn the death of their previous leader.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    Internal passports were introduced to prevent the workers from fleeing to the countryside. This control reached its zenith, according to E. Meshcherskaya, in 1933, with thousands denied passports.27 In order to quell the agitated spirits of the workers, the Bolsheviks became adept in the use of terror.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    Another important occurrence around this time was the formation of the Ras. These were local fascist leaders who established their own squads and strategy. They were vital in Mussolini's rise to power because they provided a maintained Fascist framework across Italy, especially in the run up to the March on Rome.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    their political system, making them less fearful of the threat from the left and less inclined to support the fascist violence. Violence The violence gave the impression of an unstable society which was on the edge of breakdown. Mussolini had a growing cult of personality and the socialist violence did a lot to improve this.

  1. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    Yet again, we can see that not merely his control of army can be attributed to his rise to power. The way the soldiers and government viewed Napoleon was very important. It was thanks to the Italian campaign in 1796 to 1797 that Napoleon gained the loyalty of his troops

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    Although Alexander III's intensification of the counter-revolution begun by his father in 1866 served to secure his position the seeds of future problems were being sown. His strengthening of the Okhran (under Dmitriy Tolstoy) gave it massive powers. Tolstoy restricted the power the zemstva and his actions, together with those

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work