• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Stalin's acquisition of power a product of the power base that he had built for himself before Lenin's death? Before Lenin's death in 1924 Stalin held many pointless positions which allowed him to build up his power but only by a tiny amount. During the Russian Civil War and Polish-Soviet War, Stalin was political commissar of the Red Army at various fronts. Stalin's first government position was as People's Commissar of Nationalities Affairs (1917-23). Also, he was People's Commissar of Workers and Peasants Inspection (1919-22), a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the republic (1920-23) and a member of the Central Executive Committee of the Congress of Soviets (from 1917). Stalin most important position was as General Secretary. This role in the party let Stalin build up a power base. At the Party Congress close to Lenin's, he used this position to be granted permission to expel "unsatisfactory" party members. This later enabled Stalin to remove thousands of supporters of Trotsky, his main rival for the leadership of the party. ...read more.


Lenin's Testament, with its warning against Stalin and suggestion that he be removed from leadership, was read at the next Central Committee meeting. This was a critical moment, if his rivals had demanded compliance with the testament at this point, Stalin would not have survived their attacks, even though he had a power base it was not yet large enough to withstand these attacks. However with luck on his side, Trotsky kept silent because the testament would also cause problems for him too, and Stalin's allies, Kamenev and Zinoviev, came to his defence. The following year, 1924, marks the beginning of Stalin's rise to power. At that point he was one of seven members of the Politburo. The others were Zinoviev and Kamenev, Trotsky, Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, and Mikhail Tomsky. Stalin's amazing success can be attributed to a combination of his own political genius and the mistakes that his rivals persisted in making. Luck may have been a massive part in Stalin acquisition of power but you cannot forget his political aptitude. In December 1924, Stalin first articulated his own twist on Marxist orthodoxy, which he termed "Socialism in One Country." ...read more.


Kalinin and Vorishilov joined the Politburo, and the suddenly weakened Kamenev and Zinoviev turned to Trotsky for support, forming a "United Opposition" in the summer of 1926. But they were no match for the Bukharin-Stalin alliance. By the time of the next Party Congress, in October of 1926, Zinoviev and Kamenev had been removed from the Politburo, and Stalin felt secure enough in his power to urge the Party's official repudiation of their views as "anti-Leninist." Trotsky resisted, and in 1927 he was expelled from the party and exiled to Central Asia; Zinoviev and Kamenev, defeated, begged for clemency, which the Politburo granted. Stalin was triumphant--now, even his ally in this struggle, Bukharin, grew nervous, as he realized that Stalin's power in the Party now overshadowed even his own influence. Overall there were many factors that helped Stalin's acquisition of power but I do not believe that the base of power he had before Lenin's death was the most important reason. Without luck or having the right political I am certain Stalin wouldn't have been able to build up so much power in such a short period of time, let alone survived Lenin's Testament. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tim Currie ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    By not showing, Trotsky allowed himself to be open to criticism, especially by Stalin. Attacks from Stalin not only caused the people of Russia to turn against him, but also members of the Communist Party. Trotsky also criticised party members at times when he really should've been making stronger alliances with them.

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    Although elections had little success, the Nazi Party continued to grow. The growth can be owed to the gradual fading away of competitor nationalists groups, such as the DNVP. This view was echoed in the first German biography of Hitler, by Gļæ½rlitz and Quint, two conservative historians who wrote under pseudonyms.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    This put him in a seemingly powerful position. It allowed Mussolini to get more out of negotiations with other politicians. It also gave him a political base other than his newspaper, to promote his party. As a result of this growth, in October 1921 Fascism had a strong footing as a political party.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power in 1923 – 9?

    There were a few major points leading to this. Firstly he was arrogant, and offended senior party members, and also failed to take the opposition seriously. He made little effort to build up support in the ranks of the party as Stalin had and didn't realise this until it was

  1. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    When crops failed they faced starvation. Most peasants were in debt to their landlords to pay for their farms. Taxes were levied on goods not income and this made life even harder for the poor. Many peasants began to move to the cities and towns in search of work.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    Stalin also had a major impact on the Society of Russia. In Stalin's power more children attended school but teachers were only allowed to teach the communist view which in some cases was completely inaccurate and obviously biased. Many children joined communist youth organisations, they had been brainwashed by the

  1. 'To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, ...

    Most workers were called up to fight for the Red army or into administrative positions within the party. Others were forced to flee the towns in order to search for food, which had been in short supply. Workers seemed to suffer most from the Civil War and began to vent

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Despite all the problems there had been with the collectivisation policy, Stalin was able to recover Russia from economic, industrial and agricultural dilemmas. Stalin also gave Russia some hopes, with the industrial policy. Stalin ended the NEP and began a series of Five Year Plans. These plans were highly ambitious.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work