• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalins position within the party and his manipulation of the competing power blocks of 1924-29 responsible for the defeat of his rivals?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Stalin?s position within the party and his manipulation of the competing power blocks of 1924-29 responsible for the defeat of his rivals? Although Stalin?s position within the Bolshevik party as well as his manipulation of the power blocks was vital in the defeat of his rivals there were also other contributing factors to Stalin?s rise to power in the years 1924-29. These other factors are things such as the mistakes of his opponents and his use of the legacy left by Lenin in order to convince people that he was doing the work of the late party leader. Stalin?s position as General Secretary was vital for creating a nationwide powerbase for himself that the other contenders for leadership of the party did not possess, the other contenders simply had a powerbase within the government rather than within the entire party. Because Stalin?s position as General Secretary allowed him to promote his personal power and influence within the party it made his role in the struggle for power much more important. ...read more.


It was not even evident to his enemies when Lenin?s Testament was leaked to Stalin by Lenin?s secretaries who of course would have been appointed by Stalin that Stalin?s role was a very powerful one in the right hands ? and those hands just happened to belong to Stalin. The biggest mistake was made by Zinoviev and Kamenev who sided with Stalin to form the Triumvirate against Trotsky, they were too worried about the threat of a military dictatorship under Trotsky to realise in enough time that they had sided with their biggest threat. This mistake meant that Stalin could eliminate his biggest threat before he eventually turned on Zinoviev and Kamenev and eventually Bukharin too. Trotsky was the favourite to take over the party after Lenin?s death because of his big personality and being donned a ?Revolutionary Hero? as well as ?Hero of the Civil War?. He had the support of the Red Army and kept to a strict ideology, and although he had powerful supporters he also had powerful enemies making it easier for Stalin to defeat him in the struggle for power. ...read more.


Stalin had Lenin?s body embalmed and put on display against the wishes of Lenin?s family to try and create a further image of importance about the former leader that he could use in order to show that he had been very loyal to Lenin so that the people would see him as a good contender to take over the leadership of the party. In conclusion, it is evident that without his powerful position within the party that helped create a large powerbase for himself, Stalin would not have been able to rise to power and defeat his rivals in the years 1924-29. He successfully manipulated his friends and rivals, playing them off each other to his own advantage so that he could eliminate them as a threat against him getting into power. However, there were other factors that also allowed Stalin to rise to power, but these other factors such as the mistakes of his opponents, are not quite as vital as Stalin?s position within the party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    The forced collectivisation was a political success in spring 1930 with 60% of peasants now on collective farms, this figure rose to 77% in June 1930 and 90% in 1936.12 Soviet propaganda was used to cover up the failure with focusing on the intense hate-campaign against the 'Kulaks'.

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    Another limiting factor in the achievements of the Five-Year Plans was the decision by Stalin that the economy would be controlled by centralised government rather than local authorities. However the planners based in Moscow did not understand local conditions in remote areas of the Soviet Union and this led to failures because resources were inappropriately allocated resulting in wastage.

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29?

    Stalin became General Secretary and this allowed him to strongly influence the elections for almost every job in the party. The CPSU was, in theory, democratic. It worked in a heirachy, the lowest level being members in party cells and the highest being the Politburo, made up of ten leading Communists.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    by way of trying to overcome the huge influx of backward peasants. It was through the Stakhanovite movement that the state was "extracting more profit from the worker in order to benefit the elite."45 The application of this new system had created a new privileged class of 'technocratic intellectuals' who

  1. Is it right to say "Stalin gained power in the years 1924-1929 only because ...

    He was also in a position knowing that pretty much anyone who he brought into the party would vote for him. It would be a kind of a 'favour for a favour' deal since Stalin had granted them membership into the party they would, in turn, vote for him to become the next leader.

  2. How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his ...

    The ideological conflict of the contenders and the way in which Stalin was politically shrewd and carried out a series of shifting alliances contributed to his appointment as leader of the Communist party. Stalin was a centrist who never chose the right or the left wings within Communism - he kept his cards open and never gave his views away.

  1. Building Stalin's Cult of Personality: The Role of Propaganda

    Next, Stalin broke up the triumvirate to obtain "undisputed personal leadership" ("Stalin and The Cult of Personality1"). Then, in order achieve full control Stalin had to win the support of the party cadres, so he promised to provide a continued and stable leadership, to repel all of the democratic challenges

  2. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    Stalin also had severe help from Trotsky being ill, meaning that he had to step down from Commissar of War, making him less out of the picture and easier for Stalin to overpower him, even though Trotsky was most likely Lenin's favourite to become leader after him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work