• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalins position within the party and his manipulation of the competing power blocks of 1924-29 responsible for the defeat of his rivals?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Stalin?s position within the party and his manipulation of the competing power blocks of 1924-29 responsible for the defeat of his rivals? Although Stalin?s position within the Bolshevik party as well as his manipulation of the power blocks was vital in the defeat of his rivals there were also other contributing factors to Stalin?s rise to power in the years 1924-29. These other factors are things such as the mistakes of his opponents and his use of the legacy left by Lenin in order to convince people that he was doing the work of the late party leader. Stalin?s position as General Secretary was vital for creating a nationwide powerbase for himself that the other contenders for leadership of the party did not possess, the other contenders simply had a powerbase within the government rather than within the entire party. Because Stalin?s position as General Secretary allowed him to promote his personal power and influence within the party it made his role in the struggle for power much more important. ...read more.

Middle

It was not even evident to his enemies when Lenin?s Testament was leaked to Stalin by Lenin?s secretaries who of course would have been appointed by Stalin that Stalin?s role was a very powerful one in the right hands ? and those hands just happened to belong to Stalin. The biggest mistake was made by Zinoviev and Kamenev who sided with Stalin to form the Triumvirate against Trotsky, they were too worried about the threat of a military dictatorship under Trotsky to realise in enough time that they had sided with their biggest threat. This mistake meant that Stalin could eliminate his biggest threat before he eventually turned on Zinoviev and Kamenev and eventually Bukharin too. Trotsky was the favourite to take over the party after Lenin?s death because of his big personality and being donned a ?Revolutionary Hero? as well as ?Hero of the Civil War?. He had the support of the Red Army and kept to a strict ideology, and although he had powerful supporters he also had powerful enemies making it easier for Stalin to defeat him in the struggle for power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin had Lenin?s body embalmed and put on display against the wishes of Lenin?s family to try and create a further image of importance about the former leader that he could use in order to show that he had been very loyal to Lenin so that the people would see him as a good contender to take over the leadership of the party. In conclusion, it is evident that without his powerful position within the party that helped create a large powerbase for himself, Stalin would not have been able to rise to power and defeat his rivals in the years 1924-29. He successfully manipulated his friends and rivals, playing them off each other to his own advantage so that he could eliminate them as a threat against him getting into power. However, there were other factors that also allowed Stalin to rise to power, but these other factors such as the mistakes of his opponents, are not quite as vital as Stalin?s position within the party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    Consumer industry also developed, though did not necessarily improve. Throughout the Five-Year Plans, there was some growth in consumer goods, for example footwear production increased as did food production. Greater focus was placed on consumer industry in the second and third Five-Year Plans and improvements made in the late 1930s began to have an impact on living conditions, with new bakeries, ice-cream production and meat-packing factories established.

  2. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    In the first five year plans, in certain areas targets were actually exceeded. Producer's goods, valued at 6 milliards (1927) were expected to be worth 18.1 milliards by 1932, yet were actually valued at 23.1 milliards. If criticism of five year plans was the reason for purging, the killings would have slowed after these successes, yet they increased.

  1. How far was Stalin's personality responsible for the purges?

    questioned, they could be reversed if he was overpowered, further threatening Russia. Not only did Stalin see examples like this as a threat to Russia and his power, there was also the threat of an coming war, as Hitler had been made chancellor of Germany and had an anti-communist stance

  2. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    Stalin wanted the "liquidation of the kulaks as a class!"10 The kulaks were used as scapegoats for the grain shortages with many deported to 'GULAGS', shot on sight or forced to starve to death. There was resistance to 'de-kulakisation' however with kulaks burning their crops and slaughtering their animals as

  1. To what extent were the Stalinist purges simply a way of eliminating his rivals?

    a callous skirmish for power, more of a thinker than a fighter, he would have "been horrified at the idea that he should attack the party which had done so much for Russia." 2The only times Trotsky spoke out against his counterpart in the first few years were writings accessible

  2. Building Stalin's Cult of Personality: The Role of Propaganda

    and to maintain any privileges the country has gained ("The Stalin Cult: the Cult of Personality").

  1. How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his ...

    The ideological conflict of the contenders and the way in which Stalin was politically shrewd and carried out a series of shifting alliances contributed to his appointment as leader of the Communist party. Stalin was a centrist who never chose the right or the left wings within Communism - he kept his cards open and never gave his views away.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Trotsky?s strengths in the power struggle: 1. He was clever, a good speaker and had shown himself to be an energetic man of action between 1917 and 1921. 2. He had been Lenin?s right-hand man during the revolution and the Civil War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work