• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalins position within the party and his manipulation of the competing power blocks of 1924-29 responsible for the defeat of his rivals?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Stalin?s position within the party and his manipulation of the competing power blocks of 1924-29 responsible for the defeat of his rivals? Although Stalin?s position within the Bolshevik party as well as his manipulation of the power blocks was vital in the defeat of his rivals there were also other contributing factors to Stalin?s rise to power in the years 1924-29. These other factors are things such as the mistakes of his opponents and his use of the legacy left by Lenin in order to convince people that he was doing the work of the late party leader. Stalin?s position as General Secretary was vital for creating a nationwide powerbase for himself that the other contenders for leadership of the party did not possess, the other contenders simply had a powerbase within the government rather than within the entire party. Because Stalin?s position as General Secretary allowed him to promote his personal power and influence within the party it made his role in the struggle for power much more important. ...read more.


It was not even evident to his enemies when Lenin?s Testament was leaked to Stalin by Lenin?s secretaries who of course would have been appointed by Stalin that Stalin?s role was a very powerful one in the right hands ? and those hands just happened to belong to Stalin. The biggest mistake was made by Zinoviev and Kamenev who sided with Stalin to form the Triumvirate against Trotsky, they were too worried about the threat of a military dictatorship under Trotsky to realise in enough time that they had sided with their biggest threat. This mistake meant that Stalin could eliminate his biggest threat before he eventually turned on Zinoviev and Kamenev and eventually Bukharin too. Trotsky was the favourite to take over the party after Lenin?s death because of his big personality and being donned a ?Revolutionary Hero? as well as ?Hero of the Civil War?. He had the support of the Red Army and kept to a strict ideology, and although he had powerful supporters he also had powerful enemies making it easier for Stalin to defeat him in the struggle for power. ...read more.


Stalin had Lenin?s body embalmed and put on display against the wishes of Lenin?s family to try and create a further image of importance about the former leader that he could use in order to show that he had been very loyal to Lenin so that the people would see him as a good contender to take over the leadership of the party. In conclusion, it is evident that without his powerful position within the party that helped create a large powerbase for himself, Stalin would not have been able to rise to power and defeat his rivals in the years 1924-29. He successfully manipulated his friends and rivals, playing them off each other to his own advantage so that he could eliminate them as a threat against him getting into power. However, there were other factors that also allowed Stalin to rise to power, but these other factors such as the mistakes of his opponents, are not quite as vital as Stalin?s position within the party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reorganizing the truth and disseminating lies: Manipulation in Blade Runner and Maus.

    His actions are derived from an appeal to ignorance. Within the texts, this type of manipulation ultimately lends itself to the dehumanization of those who are believed to be "genetically impure". In Blade Runner, the replicants are reduced to animals and as long as Deckert continues to see them as

  2. How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his ...

    The ideological conflict of the contenders and the way in which Stalin was politically shrewd and carried out a series of shifting alliances contributed to his appointment as leader of the Communist party. Stalin was a centrist who never chose the right or the left wings within Communism - he kept his cards open and never gave his views away.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    Another limiting factor in the achievements of the Five-Year Plans was the decision by Stalin that the economy would be controlled by centralised government rather than local authorities. However the planners based in Moscow did not understand local conditions in remote areas of the Soviet Union and this led to failures because resources were inappropriately allocated resulting in wastage.

  2. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Lenin had himself also implemented a few tamer versions of Stalin's terror, yet Leninism only suggested such extremes as the Purges, Stalin turned these suggestions into gospel. The Purges can also be seen as logical in another sense, not that they follow on from the logic of Bolshevism, but that

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29?

    Stalin became General Secretary and this allowed him to strongly influence the elections for almost every job in the party. The CPSU was, in theory, democratic. It worked in a heirachy, the lowest level being members in party cells and the highest being the Politburo, made up of ten leading Communists.

  2. Is it right to say "Stalin gained power in the years 1924-1929 only because ...

    They claimed that Trotsky opposed Lenin in the build up to the October Revolution. Were this to be true Trotsky would be all but finished. This division amongst Stalin's competitors allowed him to just sit back and allow them all to decimate each other.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Some leading Bolsheviks disliked his arrogance. 3. He made no effort to build a power base in the party ? a terrible mistake when it came to inter-party fighting after Lenin?s death. It meant that Trotsky had a hard time in the late 1920s when opposing party congresses packed with Stalin?s supporters.

  2. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    in allowing and creating a path for Stalin to walk to power. Perhaps if other people in the politburo were willing to play underhand tactics like Stalin, the end would have been different. In retrospect we can see personalities might not be a main factor ? perhaps the individual ideologies

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work