• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to fear of revolution?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to 'fear of revolution'? The Great Reform Act' of 1832 was a turning point in modern Britain and has been seen by many historians as the most important piece of legislation passed in the nineteenth century. During this essay, I will discuss the central issues raised by the interpretation of whether the Great Reform Act was introduced due to 'fear of revolution' or was it the result of other internal or external factors. A motivation for reform was a fear of revolution brought about as a result of increasing unrest in Britain during 1831-32. T.B Macaulay, a Whig MP said that 'We drive over to the side of revolution those whom we shut out from power.' The idea was that including the middle class would ally them with the upper class and exclude the working class. Without the power and support of the middle class, the working class would not be able to carry out a successful revolution. ...read more.


He also argued that it was by pacifying the middle class through the Reform Act only, did Britain avoid a full scale revolt. Another factor that has arguably contributed to a growing threat of revolution was the division within the ruling classes. This was apparent in both the Whig and Tory parties. The Whigs were divided over what degree reform should extend to. The Tories had been deeply divided on the issue of Catholic emancipation, which eventually led to the split in the party and the Whigs taking office. Perhaps this division and disorder in parliament reflected the disorder outside parliament, and may even have encouraged it. The campaign for reform among the middle and working classes was a very well organised movement. Political unions were established throughout the whole of Britain, all determined to secure reform. This movement would have included the majority of the population, and a range of effective radical tactics most of which involved violence. Widespread support for the reform campaign, led to outbreaks of rioting all over the country. ...read more.


Thirdly there were divisions within the protest movement itself. Rivalry between various political unions existed as well as a conflict of opinion between middle class lead unions and working class lead unions. This was especially evident in London between the National Political Union (NPU), led by Place and the National Union of the Working Classes (NUWC), led by William Lovett, Henry Hetherington and John Cleave. Place called for and supported class collaboration while the NUWC used virulent class language which outraged middle class reformers'. Place did his utmost to ostracise extremists from the council of the NPU and the leaders of the NUWC branded him a traitor to his own class. Furthermore, there were divisions with the working class movement and in the NUWC. Some rejected the Bill as it offered nothing to the working class, while others, most notably radical William Cobbett, were prepared to support the Whigs' Reform as the first step to universal suffrage, taking the view that half a loaf would be better than none'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    but overall I feel that Britain was quite close to revolution, should the bill have not been passed by the end of 1832 as peoples anger was worsening and patience was increasingly wearing thin. The bill had been extremely revised from the initial issue in March 1831 and this was

  2. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    has suggested that even if the government did have clear aims (which were, in his view, to remove anomalies and bring into the political nation worthy sections of the middle classes), ministers did not have the time, expertise and knowledge needed to draft legislation which would give effect to these intentions.

  1. To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point?

    Inflation proved to make the 40s. freehold gradually more accessible to people and therefore made it less of a guarantee of respectability as the government had intended. Traditionally historians have argued that contested elections came about after 1832 but now some say that it has been calculated that only just over half of the elections that

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    The government was able to manage the affairs of the country, but how could the government properly represent the nation in the House of Commons and the House of Lords if they did not have representatives from the leading Industrial towns?

  1. Do you agree with the contemporary view that the Reform Act of 1832 was ...

    political arena.2 This was one of the main middle class objectives of reform. Fear of Revolution was another reason that the middle class, along with some aristocrats, called for the reform of Parliament. At the end of the 1820s, the British economy had fallen into decline, and the public discontent did not take long to manifest itself.

  2. Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the ...

    This showed people, in Ireland and England that it is definitely possible to get what you want with pressure groups and no violence. There were big campaigns for reform in the late 1820's and early 1830's, by the middle classes, and about 100 political unions' rallied support in favour or reform.

  1. To what extent does the Reform Act of 1832 deserved to be called Great?

    absence of the secret ballot open; it was highly unprofessional as bribery and manipulation was used to control different social classes to vote for candidates running in the election. This caused much discontent amongst voters as they were lured in to voting for a candidate.

  2. How great was the Great Reform Act?

    ever been recordded, and this symbolises a clear change for the good- that the electorate were getting involved more which helped contribute to the overall democracy of the whole system- and a fair, democratic electoral system was then greatly desired.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work