• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to fear of revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to 'fear of revolution'? The Great Reform Act' of 1832 was a turning point in modern Britain and has been seen by many historians as the most important piece of legislation passed in the nineteenth century. During this essay, I will discuss the central issues raised by the interpretation of whether the Great Reform Act was introduced due to 'fear of revolution' or was it the result of other internal or external factors. A motivation for reform was a fear of revolution brought about as a result of increasing unrest in Britain during 1831-32. T.B Macaulay, a Whig MP said that 'We drive over to the side of revolution those whom we shut out from power.' The idea was that including the middle class would ally them with the upper class and exclude the working class. Without the power and support of the middle class, the working class would not be able to carry out a successful revolution. ...read more.

Middle

He also argued that it was by pacifying the middle class through the Reform Act only, did Britain avoid a full scale revolt. Another factor that has arguably contributed to a growing threat of revolution was the division within the ruling classes. This was apparent in both the Whig and Tory parties. The Whigs were divided over what degree reform should extend to. The Tories had been deeply divided on the issue of Catholic emancipation, which eventually led to the split in the party and the Whigs taking office. Perhaps this division and disorder in parliament reflected the disorder outside parliament, and may even have encouraged it. The campaign for reform among the middle and working classes was a very well organised movement. Political unions were established throughout the whole of Britain, all determined to secure reform. This movement would have included the majority of the population, and a range of effective radical tactics most of which involved violence. Widespread support for the reform campaign, led to outbreaks of rioting all over the country. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thirdly there were divisions within the protest movement itself. Rivalry between various political unions existed as well as a conflict of opinion between middle class lead unions and working class lead unions. This was especially evident in London between the National Political Union (NPU), led by Place and the National Union of the Working Classes (NUWC), led by William Lovett, Henry Hetherington and John Cleave. Place called for and supported class collaboration while the NUWC used virulent class language which outraged middle class reformers'. Place did his utmost to ostracise extremists from the council of the NPU and the leaders of the NUWC branded him a traitor to his own class. Furthermore, there were divisions with the working class movement and in the NUWC. Some rejected the Bill as it offered nothing to the working class, while others, most notably radical William Cobbett, were prepared to support the Whigs' Reform as the first step to universal suffrage, taking the view that half a loaf would be better than none'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    but overall I feel that Britain was quite close to revolution, should the bill have not been passed by the end of 1832 as peoples anger was worsening and patience was increasingly wearing thin. The bill had been extremely revised from the initial issue in March 1831 and this was

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    In the 18th Century, only 558 MPs were elected to the House of Commons. In most cases, two MP's represented each constituency. These constituencies or voting districts were divided into two groups: counties and boroughs. Most MPs were generally wealthy because not only did they have to have an annual income of �600 (�300 for borough MPs)

  1. Industrial Revolution

    the physical constitution of the population and began a permanent migration away from the countryside to the towns as a result of industry gradually usurping agriculture as the lifeblood of the nation. Liverpool, for example, was seventh in the list of European capital cities by 1850 with Manchester ninth.

  2. Examine the view that the title the great Reform act given to the Act ...

    The second urge to parliamentary reform was economic change. Britain's leading commercial and industrial centers were becoming more and more under-represented in parliament and so voters became angry and opposed to the system. This view was shared with many other voters who felt that as well as giving county voters

  1. How great was the Great Reform Act?

    ever been recordded, and this symbolises a clear change for the good- that the electorate were getting involved more which helped contribute to the overall democracy of the whole system- and a fair, democratic electoral system was then greatly desired.

  2. To what extent does the Reform Act of 1832 deserved to be called Great?

    absence of the secret ballot open; it was highly unprofessional as bribery and manipulation was used to control different social classes to vote for candidates running in the election. This caused much discontent amongst voters as they were lured in to voting for a candidate.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * Sylvia Pankhurst however, became an increasingly vocal critic of the war and supported conscientious objectors. The ELFS changed its name to the Workers Suffrage Federation in 1916 and by 1918 it had become the Women?s Socialist Federation. * The Women?s Dreadnought became the Workers Dreadnought The NUWSS * Most

  2. How close to revolution was Great Britain in the 1790s?

    And this is why in 1799 Pitt took the decision to effectively abolish all trade unions when he banned the ?combination? of men, and this helped to partly eliminate the danger of (dissatisfied) working men along with their union trying to cause trouble for the government, hence why many saw this as a very good measure taken by Pitt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work