• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the alliance system responsible for the outbreak of World War One in 1914

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was the alliance system responsible for the outbreak of World War One in 1914? In the Treaty of Versailles after World War One, the Triple Entente immediately placed blame on Germany's aggression and scheming tactics for the outbreak of war. However, over time, the causes behind the war began to become more obviously complex. One of the most commonly citied reasons is the alliance system. Prior to the war, the countries of Europe had formed complex alliances and, with their empirical statuses, this apparently created a chain that a single trigger (the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand) would set into inevitable motion. But how important was the pre-1914 alliance system in causing World War One? Firstly, we must come to understand exactly what the alliance system comprised of. Indeed, many of these 'alliances' were not really alliances at all, but mutual agreements in relation to trade or colonial territories. One of the most prominent and important alliances was that of Russia to Serbia. Russia had promised to protect the Serbian people and their rights. Austria-Hungary had control over areas where Balkan people were prominent, conflicting Russian policy and ultimately leading to war. Another vital alliance was that of Austria-Hungary and Germany. ...read more.

Middle

In particular, Russia felt the need to protect the Serbian's interests, and so when Austria-Hungary attacked in 1914, they saw it as their duty to follow their promises and join the war effort. From all this, we may deduce that the alliances set up chains, through which war would become increasingly more likely. The accumulation of these agreements was the July Crisis of 1914. After the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, an ultimatum3 was sent on the 23rd of July to the Serbian government by Austria-Hungary. It stated that Serbia had to condemn all movements of independence and punish numerous citizens, including various important ministers. If this was not complied to, the Serbian administration would have to step down. They had forty eight hours to comply. Serbia refused. With the German Carte Blanche to support them, Austria-Hungary declared war. Russia, having been disgraced on the political stage once before by allowing the Bosnian annexation, pledged to aid Serbia and fight against the Austro-Hungarians. Fearing Russian mobilization, Germany launched the Schlieffen Plan, bringing France into the war. By moving through Belgium, Britain said they had broken their pledge of neutrality and joined France and Russia, relying on the Entente Cordiale4 to create the Triple Entente. In this way, we can see that the alliance system did have big implications. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any anti-German sentiments in the alliance system appeared after they had been formulated, especially after incidents such as the Moroccan Crises. It is not right, therefore, to place the entirety of the blame of World War One on the alliance system. And so, how important was the alliance system in causing the outbreak of war in 1914? It is fair to say that the alliance system operated on two levels. Firstly, the Carte Blanche from Germany to Austria-Hungary encouraged aggressive foreign policies, leading to the attacks on Serbia and angering other nations. Secondly, the alliance system acted as an excuse for various nations to engage in war whilst hoping for support from their 'allies'. However, the most important cause of World War One is not the alliance system, but Russian pride. If the Russians had not agreed to fight with Serbia, Germany would not have executed the Schlieffen Plan, thus France and Britain would never have been involved. Therefore, the alliance system acted more as an excuse for the European powers' actions, rather than act as a cause. Sources 1 Telegram August 1st 1914, Sir Edward Grey (Foreign Office) to Sir E. Goschen, No. 256 2 www.ww1accordingtobob.com/wcE.php 3 www.wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/The_Austro-Hungarian_Ultimatum_to_Serbia_%28English_translation%29 4 http://history.howstuffworks.com/world-war-i/triple-entente.htm 5 Seton-Watson, Hugh; The Decline of Imperial Russia, Butler & Tanner LTD, 1964 (pg. 118) 6 Seton-Watson, Hugh; The Decline of Imperial Russia, Butler & Tanner LTD, 1964 (pg. 155) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a well balanced and thorough response that stays focused on the question throughout and demonstrates excellent knowledge. The author should avoid asking rhetorical questions and advance judgments at the start of paragraphs instead.

5 Stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 24/10/2014

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Asses the successes and failures of Mao's domestic policies between 1949 and 1976."

    5 star(s)

    It was aimed to boost the cal, steel and chemical production. It was recorded that the1st 5year plan was a great success. The original output targets set up in 1952 were mostly achieved but also surpassed. The period from 1952 to 1957 marked an economic growth rate of 9% for China.

  2. Creative Writing - War.

    received were a few obtuse words, from my father as I walked away; 'Give the Geris a good bullocking, for your old man'. Much to my father's dismay, I would not be joining my fellow countrymen in Europe, but instead joining the war in the Far East.

  1. The factors that led to the downfall of Apartheid in South Africa

    was the fact that apartheid was only allowed to continue due to the Cold War.

  2. IMPACT OF WWI ON AUSTRALIA

    Initially, this was partly the reason for the prospering farmers benefiting from the high prices Britain paid for Australian agricultural produce - wheat, wool, sugar, dairy products and dried fruits.

  1. To what extent was Stalin to blame for the Berlin crisis 1948-9?

    in bullying the West "amounted to little more than blackmail'', and there is evidence to make this a credible argument as the West were dependent on supplies crossing through the larger Soviet zone within Germany. The German question is another issue where the Soviets had clear issues with, the West

  2. Explain how the Vietnam War affected Australian society and/or its relationships with the rest ...

    War I and II, the soldiers returning from the Vietnam War received insignificant recognition and celebration for their services from Australian society.

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    Britain also increased her army, which became important for fighting a European war. Therefore appeasement can be considered very successful as if Britain and France had chosen not to follow it and had gone to war earlier they may well have been a lot weaker than Germany and could easily have lost the war.

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    group of local of local leaders was produced, who spearheaded future change. The reform was achieved with little bloodshed and on the whole benefited the poor. Basically the communist party offered fair taxes, fair distribution of wealth. Mao, in 1953, went on to devise the first five year plan with the help of Russian advisers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work