• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the authoritarian nature of the Nazi regime an aberration in the context of German history in the years 1848-1949?

Extracts from this document...


Literature Review To what extent was the authoritarian nature of the Nazi regime an aberration in the context of German history in the years 1848-1949? Factual Summary In addressing the issue outlined in the title, some key terms must first be clarified. Authoritarianism involves a political system in which individual freedom is held as subordinate to the power and authority of the state, centred either in a leader or leaders, typically unelected by the people, possessing exclusive and arbitrary power. Political theorists have added various stipulations and details to this definition over the years, but the aforementioned description is generally agreed upon. While it is clear that, throughout the period 1848-1948, Germany could never be described as being fully authoritarian, there is certainly evidence of strong authoritarianism in Germany, particularly in Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany. From the quashing of pluralism to racialist policies to the complete lack of constitution, there is an unequivocally strong authoritarianism working at the heart of Nazi Germany, indeed authoritarianism spilling over into totalitarianism. What must be ascertained is whether this authoritarianism was an aberration in the context of German history or whether it was a logical development of what had preceded it, the word 'aberration' simply alluding to an irregularity without precedent, something which deviates from normal course. ...read more.


In short, the state had become synonymous with the economy itself. Balfour feels that the authoritarian elements in Nazi Germany spilled over into totalitarianism, and he makes a point of contrasting the traditional authoritarianism in Germany against the brutal totalitarianism of Nazi Germany. Indeed, concerning the introduction of laws which secured individual personal liberty between 1872 and 1883, he stated that Germany had its own form of Liberalism, or 'Rechstaat', which replaced the previously authoritarian state, 'Obrigkeitstraat'. This seems to go against the theory of Sonderweg. Adam feels that Vansittartism, a wartime sentiment which warned of a pattern of German aggression so deeply rooted in its history that Hitler wasn't an aberration, but a logical development of this aggression, emphasised several key facets which supported the theory of Sonderweg: cultural and political conditioning toward authoritarianism and militarism, popular support for the Nazi regime, and the weakness of the German opposition, albeit only when stripped of its wartime polemic. A. J. P. Taylor feels that, due to the lack of national middle class in Germany (and the opportunity passed up in the first years of Charles V) meant that there was a continuous, uninterrupted and steady advance of authoritarianism and absolutism from the early 16th century till the late 17th century. ...read more.


A. J. P. Taylor concedes this: "I had taken the line, perhaps somewhat exaggerated by wartime feelings, that Germany had not been democratic even in Weimar Germany and the Hitlerism, far from being an aberration, grew out of what had come before". While his point is valid in some ways (especially considering the role of Article 48 in enabling Hitler), the Sonderweg theory does not seem realistic. Adam's fairly objective account of Vansittartism takes into account that it shows evidence of continuities only when stripped of its "wartime polemic". Maybe the pro-Sonderweg argument, then, is fuelled too much by wartime feeling to be fully justified. It seems that the pro-aberration argument is more accurate and an easier position to justify, as solid proof is used to highlight discontinuities between Imperial Germany and Nazi Germany. It may be most prudent to say that, while elements of authoritarianism were certainly existent throughout the period, and while certain elements could be observed throughout, the scale of authoritarianism in Nazi Germany was unprecedented, with Imperial absolutism being replaced by Hitler's iron totalitarianism, making the authoritarianism in Germany an aberration only in terms of its scale, with certain continuities from Imperial Germany, but not as many as the Sonderweg argument relies upon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Henig supports the fact that the Madagascar plan was still the Nazis main plan in terms of dealing with the Jews by citing a diary entry by Goebbels on 17th April 1940 where he states that the Nazis are still intent on shipping the Jews to Madagascar.

  2. Within the context of the period 1869-1914, to what extent was the British take-over ...

    Also, the idea of Cecil Rhodes using such untoward tactics is hardly surprising considering his character and attitude to colonialism. Rhodes famously believed that "what was good for the British Empire was good for the world"; thereby undermining all other countries and thereby adopting what today would be known as a nationalistic attitude.

  1. Russia and its Locomotive of History

    of these reforms could have embedded the revolt notions that the war had brought to attention. In 1877, Russia then became involved in the Russo-Turkish war. Despite the fact that Alexander II did not want to fight Turkey, it primarily culminated a year later in an initial gain for Russia

  2. Describe the main forms of opposition to the Nazi regime, 1933 - 1939/Why did ...

    regime, owing to its international base and thriving network of schools, clubs and youth groups. However, the churches never managed to seriously oppose the regime, mainly because their methods of resistance were insignificant in comparison to the strength of the Nazis.

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    The Napoleonic system of administration still exists in France today, showing just how much of an advantage a successful system of government could have been to Louis XVI. However, not all historians would agree with this view. Revisionists began altering the interpretations of Lefebvre in the 1960s, disagreeing with Lefebvre's vision of a 'social revolution'.


    The timing of Anschluss was dictated by events, and once again Hitler took the opportunity to meet his goal. Bullock saw this episode as a 'striking example' of Hitler's ability to combine consistency in aim, calculation and patience in preparation with opportunism and improvisation'. Anschluss was strategically and economically important.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    of peoples on a scale without precedent in the history of the human race. The sheer size of this disaster was due to a number of causes: 1. the immense geographical extent of the war front, involving almost every country in Europe; 2.

  2. To what extent did the Nazi regime overturn the Weimar education system?

    Germany?s defeat and that Hitler is the one who will revenge the unfair Treaty of Versailles. In geography, the children were taught about the land that according to the Nazis belonged to Germany as Lebensraum, the land that Great Germany would conquer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work