To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

Authors Avatar

Shahidul Islam

To what extent was the Russian Civil War the main factor in the Bolsheviks’ consolidation of power between 1917-24?

The civil war became one of the most iconic moments of the Bolshevik regime especially when it came to consolidating their power, but many historians differ in their interpretation of which Civil War contributed more to the Bolsheviks’ consolidation of power and whether it was indeed the Civil War or another external factor. Modern western liberal revisionist historians have the interpretation that in fact the Reds versus Whites Civil War was not that important, however the Reds v Greens civil war proved to be much more significant in the course of consolidation of their power as this removed most of the political unrest directed at the Bolshevik party, but were these factors the most significant to their consolidation or did other factors such as the peasants or the nationalities have a larger impact? In this context ‘to consolidate’ could be defined as either strengthening their position or more to do with uniting their support and destroying their opposition, and this essay will be investigating whether the Civil War was indeed the main factor in their consolidation, or was it merely a coincidental blessing which assisted another factor more significant to the Bolsheviks’ consolidation of power between 1917-24?

The Reds versus Whites Civil War was not the only victory the Bolsheviks needed to secure in order to consolidate power but was significant as it disposed of some opposition. The Brest-Litovsk agreement between Russia and Germany galvanized significant uprisings within Russia’s population and the Whites ceased upon this opportunity to pursue their desire in overthrowing the Bolsheviks’ communist regime. The Whites consisted of two different groups with different aspirations: the foreign interventionists and the monarchists. The foreign interventionists mostly from Britain, France and Japan had one sole purpose of removing power from the Bolshevik party in Russia. Whereas the monarchists wanted the Tsarist regime to return and not any other alternative; thus disabling them to unite with the interventionists effectively as they tried to pursue with their figurehead to come back to power. The Bolsheviks realised that the Whites did pose little but some threat to their regime and needed to remove this via fighting and assassinations; most notably on Tsar Nicholas II’s family which proved highly effective in suppressing the Whites. “The execution of the Tsar’s family was needed not only to frighten, horrify and instil a sense of hopelessness in the enemy”. Also a modern revisionist historian, Brian Moynahan, states that “Their [Czech Legion] success was a death sentence for Nicholas and his family. The party did not want to give the Whites any live banner to rally round” This conveys that the purpose of the execution of the Tsar and his family utilised the vulnerability of the Whites and removed this figurehead for the Monarchists thus leading them to believe that the war effort and the counter-revolution was futile. This also strengthens the point that although removing opposition was relatively an easy process, it still was necessary and the Whites did pose a threat. However, the credibility of the extract from Trotsky’s diary is questionable as he would have known that this would have been seen after his death but Moynahan does provide support for the evidence to establish that it was a victory which was needed to secure consolidate power.

They were also the most publicised opponent to the Bolsheviks regime during the Russian Civil War; this was due mostly to the Bolsheviks as they wanted to show this perception and traditional soviet or Marxist historians shared this also. “The struggle against the foreign imperialists and the whiteguards lasted for three years…By the close of 1920 all the crusades launched by the imperialists and their allies in Russia were routed…This was a signal victory in defence of Soviet power”. This source was published under the direction of the Soviet government implying that there may have been other factors that would have weakened this argument as they were included like the war against the greens which leads me to the impression that this source is not very credible. And they would be cautious on what sort of signal they would have emitted to the rest of the world as the communist soviet government was still in power in during the time. Furthermore this view is disapproved by many western revisionist historians “The Russian Civil War was not just the war between the Reds and the Whites…indeed, this war did relatively little to shape the subsequent Soviet regime”. This contradicts the other statement because the historian is a reliable and respected historian looking back in hindsight. This perception is shared by other modern historians too as Stephen Lee states “The Red – White Civil War was largely over by late 1920…But…the Bolsheviks were now confronted with a second Red – Green Civil War” which backs the evidence against this traditional Marxist view as the Reds versus Whites Civil War was over before the official end of the War, as Soviet historiography dates the end in 1922, thus leading me to the assumption that the Reds versus Whites Civil War was somewhat significant as it was a victory for the Bolsheviks, however this was not the only victory which they needed to secure in order to consolidate power as the Reds versus Greens Civil War was arguably more important which is not acknowledged by traditional Marxists or soviets.

Join now!

In order to consolidate power, the war against the “Greens” proved to be a more significant factor as it was arguably more vital to establishing a Soviet Marxist society. The “Greens” as they were called were a group of members from other political parties, such as the Social Revolutionaries (SRs), Mensheviks and Kadets who grew huge discontent after the October revolution. This then was compounded by Russia’s withdrawal from the war and allegiances with Germany through the Brest – Litovsk agreement which further infuriated them as it was perceived as showing weakness but the Bolsheviks believed it was the quick ...

This is a preview of the whole essay