• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important factor?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important factor? Bismarck contributed to the German cause; he encouraged and followed through the making of German unification. However, although he was the most important factor he was not the only factor. There were political movements, economic progress sand changes in the monarchy that also contributed towards German unification. The king was about to abdicate: "I have there for resolved to lay down my crown," the king however did not follow this through. If he did it would have been a complete victory for the liberals. Instead of giving up, he appointed a new chancellor to change things; the chancellor was Otto Von Bismarck. Bismarck was the kings last hope of success. He saved the king from a parliamentary crisis, the king was eternally grateful, from then on took Bismarck's advice, and fully trusted him to run his country In every situation that arose Bismarck assessed it and exploited it to his own means-his aim was to unite Germany as a successful and powerful nation. One example of this was with the Danes. ...read more.

Middle

This was appropriately leaked to the French press. After this event relations between France and Prussia deteriorated. Austria took the Prussians side, again they also had the Italians support. The French had no powerful allies. The final straw went when Bismarck nominated Leopold to take over the Spanish throne; he sent a �50,000 bribe to persuade them. As soon as the French heard about this they sent an ultimatum to the king, the king chose to withdraw Leopold. Later the king was asked to never renew this proposal, he refused and sent Bismarck a telegram informing him of the recent events. Bismarck saw this as an opportunity to begin the war; he shrewdly edited the telegram and leaked it to the press. France declared war on 19 July. The French were easily beaten, they withdrew to metz. They refused the peace treaty because it meant giving up alscace and Lorraine, they fought on. Later a peace treaty was signed at Frankfurt on 10 May. Alsace and Lorraine, �200,000,000 and fortresses were taken away. As well as a humiliating march led by the king through Prussia. ...read more.

Conclusion

The people were united because they all wanted one thing. They fought and received a parliament; this would make them believe they had power- give them a sense of nationalism although the parliament had failed in uniting Germany they had still taken a step forward. The parliament had assessed the situation, found the problem thought of a solution and followed it through. It was only that the king did not want Germany united that the event never took place. This was another link in the chain to unification of Germany. In 1858 King Frederick William was declared insane. His brother was appointed king in 1861; he was King William I. William believed in unification of Germany and he believed Prussia should lead it. This was an essential step in the unification of Prussia. In the process of unification, things were all in motion- changing, new movements happening frequently. This was the century of change in every way. Bismarck was the most important factor contributing to the unification of Germany. He created opportunities and used every situation to its full potential. Without Bismarck the process would have taken a far longer time. However Bismarck was not the only factor the were political and economic movements but Bismarck outweighed these by his lateral think and use of his power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    This allowed the commander to choose whatever combination of line and column seemed best to him at the time, in what came to be called 'mixed order'. It was a development of this 'mixed order', which Napoleon most frequently employed in battle - the infantry in a concentrated but mobile

  2. To what extent should Bismarck receive credit for the unification of Germany?

    The Italians promised Prussia military support in the case of war with Austria, in exchange for the Austrian territory of Venetia after the defeat of the Austrians. Russia, who was still grateful to Prussia for their military support against the Poles in 1863 agreed to remain neutral in the event of war between Austria and Prussia.

  1. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    it is now apparent was only put forward due to pressure from Bismarck himself.14 Here we can see, once again, Bismarck attempting to engineer the politics of Europe to benefit Prussia. In fact, when France demanded a guarantee that no Prussian candidate would ever be put forward for candidacy of

  2. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    unification of Germany because it allows Prussia to ascend to power throughout the 1850's and 60's ultimately resulting in unification. Austria is weak by 1866 because she had a poorly run economy and not enough public income to afford a larger and more modern army.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    A New Beginning West Germany built in many styles on its ruins. In the first stage a roof was put over a ground floor, a theater, or a "hotel" was made of an air-raid shelter. Many of the later structures look like American apartment houses and office buildings.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon's success in Europe to 1807 the consequences of his ...

    People were full of this revolutionary ardour and actively sought battle. This was a wholly new perspective of war and the causes it was fought for. Generally, Napoleon's enemies fought Wars of maneuvers and not, unlike Napoleon's army, with the intention of completely annihilating the enemy.

  1. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    John argues that although Bismarck influenced German nationalist feeling, German nationalist feeling influenced him on a greater scale. However it can also be argued that Bismarck had little to do with creating nationalist feeling which solely stemmed from disliking of the French- "German nationalism was anti-French in origin" (Waller)

  2. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    a huge impact on the morale of the British population, but with hindsight the damage done on the Ruhr was not as major as made out at the time. One also has to question what else the Commandos or indeed any of the other British Forces could do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work