• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the Crusaders success at Antioch due to the leadership of Bohemond?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?To what extent was the Crusaders success at Antioch due to the leadership of Bohemond?? Bohemond ruled over the crusade as a part of a committee of nobles. Bohemond was one of the most important of these leaders. Antioch was described by Stephen of Blois as "a city great beyond belief, very strong and unassailable". Its capture was dependent on the finding of a traitor in the city willing to provide the Crusaders with the knowledge and opportunities to capture the city, due to his connection with Firouz, one of the commanders in the city; but he would not bring matters to an issue until the possession of the city was assured him (May 1098), under the terror of the approach of Kerbogha with a relief army, and with a reservation in favour of Alexius, if Alexius should fulfil his promise to aid the crusaders. ...read more.

Middle

The battle which set the tone of the whole siege was the battle against Duqaq of Damascus. Duqaq was a powerful leader and his army had been inflicted with heavy causalities due to the confrontation with Raymond and Bohemunds army. Despite this both sides were left with significant casualties, this postponed the crusade. The capture of the city was due to Bohemond?s plans to ignore his oaths to Alexius and set up an individual principality at Antioch. He tried to contract the ownership of the city from the other leaders if he somehow was able to construe its fall. Due to his connection with Firouz, one of the commanders in the city; but he would not bring matters to an issue until the possession of the city was assured him (May 1098 with a reservation in favour of Alexius, if Alexius should fulfil his promise to aid the crusaders. ...read more.

Conclusion

From the Tower of the Two Sisters, the crusaders were able to open a postern gate, and make their way to the Gate of the Bridge, one of the main gates into the city. A Turkish-held fort, Harem, which lay some miles to the East of Antioch, also mounted repeated skirmish attacks. These were attacks were so troublesome that the crusaders built a fort, which they named Malregard, on a hill to the east of Bohemond's camp to protect this flank of the army. To help defend the road to St Symeon from raids launched through the Bridge Gate, Godfrey's forces built a bridge, the Bridge of Boats, across the Orontes to their rear. This allowed them to cross the river to meet attacks which had crossed via the Bridge Gate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    hands and pilgrims would be allowed to freely visit the Holy Land. Furthermore, after the treat it was allowed by Saladin that two Latin priests and two deacons could serve the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem and at Bethlehem and Nazareth.

  2. To what extent was strong leadership the main reason for the success of the ...

    dissolved and would have most likely have turned against each other and their Eastern allies.

  1. How important was the discovery of the Holy Lance in the Crusader success in ...

    of the sieges of both Kerbogha and the Crusaders themselves; starvation was rife in the Crusader camps and as they weren't fighting under a common leader- the only thing uniting them was religion. This shared religious fervour was unleashed when Peter Bartholomew claimed to have had a vision of St.

  2. How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya?

    Ibrahim also suffered from a lack of charisma. He was not known for the style of his speeches but for his "sharp analysis of rational precision" (Milner, 1994) - terms people would hardly use to describe American President Obama's rhetoric.

  1. How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945?

    Whilst this symbolic embodiment of the pity of war is arguably the most profound legacy in human terms, it is important to make clear that this is something that has only developed after the fact, in a concerted effort to suitably portray the consequences of such enormous changes in the

  2. To what extent is Arrian's praise of Alexander's leadership justified?

    Inheriting a vivid, romantic imagination and a strong will from his formidable mother- Olympias, leaves no doubt that Alexander was brought up in a militarily, politically and socially solid background, again placing him in an excellent mindset to become an effective leader from a very young age.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Lack of food and water compounded the hardships of the campaign. The Muslims often poisoned wells, encountered along the way. Those who have survived these were rewarded with their first victory when, in June 1098 Antioch was besieged and taken.

  2. To what extent was superior military leadership the reason for success in the first ...

    degree of cooperation and common purpose organised by the ?council of princes? at crucial times. Such discussion needs to be balanced against other reasons for the success of the Crusade, such as: religious zeal (and its demonstration at key points, for example at and after Antioch and at Jerusalem), military

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work