• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the development of the Labour movement the most significant threat to the Liberal party (1886-1901)?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LABOUR MOVEMENT THE MOST SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE LIBERAL PARTY (1886-1901)? In the period from 1846 (when the Conservatives split following the repeal of the Corn Laws) until 1886, the Liberals were the natural party of government, but after 1886 the Liberals failed to win an election until 1906. One interpretation of the main cause of this decline was the rise of the Labour movement and the greater appeal they held for the working classes. Another interpretation is that there were other threats to the Liberal Party which were greater than the labour movement, most prominently the Conservatives and Liberals themselves (that is to say, Liberal weaknesses). In truth, all of these factors played a role in the Liberal decline, but it was ultimately the Liberal's own failings which not only lead to their own decline, but also fuelled the rise of the Labour movement and the Conservative resurgence which hastened the decline. On the surface, it would appear that the interpretation that it was the rise of the labour movement which posed the most significant threat to the Liberal Party and was the largest factor in its decline has much to commend it. After the ineffectuality and passiveness of the craft unions, 1888 'New Unionism' had an actively militant outlook, with a membership of unskilled, low-paid labourers and a readiness to use force against non-unionists and 'blacklegs'. ...read more.

Middle

The historian Laybourn cites the "almost endemic weakness of organised labour" as something which "deluded the Liberal Party into thinking that it could stand still in the face of the 'little breezes' of discontent that occasionally emerged", despite the "seething discontent which had erupted among working class unionists from the late 1880s onwards". Laybourn states, then, that the loose organisation of the labour movement gave the Liberals a false sense of security and a sense of complacency, thus it could be said that the labour movement indirectly and unintentionally threatened the Liberal Party. However, for the most part, it must be said that, at this juncture, the movement lacked the necessary focus to act as any kind of real alternative to the Liberals, and thus probably did not serve as its greatest threat. With the labour movement's infancy rendering it incapable of posing any great threat to the Liberal Party, other threats must be assessed in deciding which was the greatest. The most obvious threat here is that of the Conservative Party, which had patiently rebuilt itself in the aftermath of its 1846 split. One way in which the Tories hindered the Liberals was through their control of the House of Lords: with this, much Liberal reform was blocked, leading to greater public discontent with the Liberal Party. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, post-Gladstone Liberal leader Lord Rosebery was weak and lacked support; indeed, the only reason he was selected as Prime Minister following Gladstone's retirement in 1894 was that Queen Vicotria disliked the other Liberals. His unpopularity and inexperience is a far cry from the vast experience and solid fortitude of Conservative leader Lord Salisbury. It is clear, then, that it was more the case that Liberal failings both enabled and flattered Tory achievements (enabling Villa Toryism and flattering modest but steady Tory reform, as examples) rather than any great political masterstrokes from the Conservative Party. It may be most prudent, then, to suggest that the Liberal Party debilitated their own progress from 1886-1901 and were the greatest threat to themselves in this period, as they allowed for the Conservatives' success by failing to offer a credible alternative. As Blewett states: "the Liberals appear to have done their best to lose the elections of 1886, 1895 and 1900... the hegemony (conservative success) was sustained not primarily because of any positive enthusiasm for the Unionists but because the Liberals were considered 'impossible'." Liberal decline occurred because of Liberal failings, and these failings enabled the Conservatives and the sapling labour movement to gain ground on them. In a prime example of negative politics, the Liberal's distinct lack of cohesion, unity and purpose led to their own decline; they were truly their own worst enemy. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    The first-past-the-post system played a key role in both winning Labour the vote in 1945 and losing it in 1951. What seems stingingly ironic is that in 1951 the Labour party actually received the largest percentage of the vote than any other party had in Britain's history and still lost the election.

  2. Why did the Liberals win and the Conservatives lose the 1906 Election?

    They would have therefore voted for the liberals, so that they could express to the conservatives they did not approve of the 1902 education act. Above, I have outlined the main strengths that the liberal party had, which may have attracted votes away from the conservatives thus winning the 1906 election.

  1. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    - he found that out of 15 asked, 10 approved, and only 1, Bishop Scory of Hereford, saw them as a threat. Grindal sent a letter to Elizabeth which defended prophesyings, discussed ways to control them, and finally implied that Elizabeth should recognize the need to please God and not just herself - "you are a mortal creature.

  2. How far was Germany the greatest threat to Britains position as a world power ...

    However, it must be acknowledged that the USA superseded both Germany and Britain in terms of industrial output by 1900, becoming the world leader in both iron and steel production. Furthermore, the fact that Germany was developing economically and rivalling Britain's output does not necessarily mean that Britain's position as

  1. The Successes of Labour from 1945

    These divisions lost Labour some of its electoral strength and continued to weaken the party when it went into opposition. There were other underlying reasons. Some voters had grown tired of government controls associated with bureaucracy, red tape and high levels of taxation.

  2. How Successful was Edward Carson in His Defense of Unionism During The Third Home ...

    Whilst Unionists and Liberals are becoming somewhat more tolerant of each other, it is Redmond who begins to grow frustrated with the apparent rescinding on the Home Rule by Asquith?s government. He famously said ?Irish Nationalists can never be assenting parties to the mutation of the Irish nation, Ireland is

  1. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    The Combinations Acts, introduced in the midst of the governments proverbial ?reign of terror? to fully quell the radical threat in 1799, were eventually abolished in 1824. The abolition of the Trade Unions in the first place was seen by many as harsh and cutting away an essential part of

  2. Study all the sources. Using all these sources and your own knowledge, assess the ...

    of power: ?Our hope is that if people find sickness increasing, and insurance premiums going up, they may turn their attention to the prevention of poverty itself?. This also shows a sense of desperation alike Source A, and show the party were in a bad state in 1911 as their votes were still far worse than the Liberals?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work