• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the development of the post-Stalinist thaw in superpower relations between 1953 and 1962 the result of Khrushchevs policy of peaceful coexistence?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the development of the post-Stalinist thaw in superpower relations between 1953 and 1962 the result of Khrushchev's policy of "peaceful coexistence"? After 1953 there was a general improvement in Superpower relations and both sides were prepared, on occasions, to engage in constructive dialogue. There was greater stability compared to the period of 1945-52. The change in Soviet leadership produced a policy of "peaceful coexistence" and the US responded with the "New Look" and "Flexible Response" while trying to maintain US superiority. The results of these changes were to produce a thaw though the period, also seeing swift changes from conciliation with the Geneva Summit and Khrushchev's visit to US, to confrontation: Berlin Crisis. Peaceful-coexistence was the soviet belief that the fall of capitalism was inevitable but it did not mean that the fall would come by war but as a result of revolution. BY 1949 Europe was divided into two armed camps the NATO and Warsaw pact. With their positions secure, the superpowers were more willing to attempt negotiation (that also resulted in thaw). The development of nuclear capability by both sides made the cold war very dangerous; by 1955 both sides had the Hydrogen Bomb. Money was required to stay ahead in the arms race that seriously unbalanced the USSR's economy were about 33% of the economy was diverted to military expenditure. ...read more.


BY 1958 data from U2 spy planes showed that the US had nuclear superiority over the USSR. Eik was more inclined to negotiate. Eik had the confidence to pursue his own policies and was a firm believer in face-to-face diplomacy making. The public rhetoric of hard line anti-communist did not always translate into practical policy making. In part the New Look policy was designed to save money on conventional arms by relying on fewer but more powerful nuclear weapons (more bang for the buck). By 1954 12% of US GNP was spent on armaments. Ideally Eik would have liked to reduce this and that entailed seeking some kind of agreement with the USSR. Hence the US government was facing many of the same pressures as the USSR form the early 1950s and was prepared to reach limited forms of accommodation with its opposite number. The first crisis in the "thaw" period came in Hungary, which showed the vulnerability of the Soviet sphere of influence. Calls of liberalization within Hungary were encouraged by Khrushchev's policy of De-Stalinization and demonstrated that changes within the USSR could have an impact on its satellite states. De-Stalinization encouraged reform by criticizing Stalin's system of terror and by Nikita's suggestion that there could be more than one road towards socialism. De-Stalinization led to calls by the general public in Eastern Europe for a liberalization bi its regimes. ...read more.


in return for a neutral Germany was unlikely to produce results. Khrushchev was now willing to agree to the solution proposed by the East German government. To stem the exodus of its own people the East German government closed the main frontier between East Germany and West Germany in 1958 but it was still possible to move from East Germany into West Berlin. The continued loss of population threatened the survival of East Germany. Ulbricht had wanted a Berlin Wall for some time nut had been overruled by Nikita. He had now changed his mind. The Wall was referred to in the west as the "Wall of Shame", The East German government called it the "anti-fascist protective barrier". It became a symbol of a divided continent. East Germany was stabilized but at the price of advertising to the world that communist citizens had to be penned in to stop them escaping. In conclusion, superpower relations during the 1953-62 periods reflected the stability of the spheres of influence established in Europe. Both sides felt secure enough to pursue different approaches to those followed since 1945. Military and economic concerns pushed both sides towards an accommodation with each other. A change in leader in both USA and USSR promoted different approaches as each new leader tried to impose their own particular stamp on the policy. The lurch form crisis to crisis was in some ways a consequence of the wrong policy pursued by Nikita. The large degree of power vested in the Soviet leader was a product of the political system set up by Stalin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    As historians Martin Sherwin and Barton Bernstein have shown, the momentum behind the Manhattan Project was such that no one ever debated the underlying assumption that, once perfected, nuclear weapons would be used.

  2. The Korean War and Superpower relations

    The US was afraid of increasing USSR aggressiveness, as a result, the US wanted to be prepared for the possibility of a Soviet attack hence they enhanced the militarization of Cold War, however, it caused the increased in tensions between the US and USSR.

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    In March 1947, Truman promised that the USA would help any country that was threatened by 'armed minorities or by outside pressures' : in other words, by communism. This became known as the Truman Doctrine. * Some countries in Western Europe were in serious poverty after WW2.

  2. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    The author explains the causes that provoked the "urgent need" for the implementation of his policies. Ironically, he states: "a delay in starting perestroika would have guided us to...a very serious social, economical and political crisis."6 He then analyses the current national situation.

  1. To what extent had the USSR recovered from the impact of the Second World ...

    It was not only in the country where the people suffered, workers in the towns faced inflated targets and reduced wages (further than this they were expected to subscribe to state bonds which totalled several weeks' wages!). Consumer goods were very scarce, for examples although there were 341 million knitted

  2. Was the West justified in ignoring the 1956 events in Hungary and Poland as ...

    of NATO was decided during Berlin blockade; and during the Korean War, the constellation of political forces in the US and Allied countries was pushed to the right. American pressure and the Western decision to form blocs resulted in the Soviet Union seeking greater political conformity in Eastern and South Eastern Europe.

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    but also because he was a well reputed solder and patriot who seemed the right leader to combat communism. Eisenhower?s ?New Course? was a more strident foreign policy, and comprised four key elements: the use of greater nuclear weapons, a policy of massive retaliation which involved the threat or use

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    The Development of Globalism * Communist takeover of China in 1949 turned attention to the far-east * Korean War (1950-1953) and events in Vietnam in 1954 * European decolonisation resulted in newly independent states appearing in the ?third world?: needing financial assistance coupled with the fear that other superpowers would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work