• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the failure of the constitutional monarchy caused by the French declaration of war in 1792?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the failure of the constitutional monarchy caused by the French declaration of war? The constitutional monarchy which came into being in September 1791 was short lived. Although in 1789 there had been a majority in support of a constitutional monarchy, and a near non-existent support for a republic, these were tumultuous times and the people were ideologically fickle enough to be swayed by several key events/factors. On October 1st, there was held the first meeting of the Legislative assembly, due to self-denying ordinance there was a total replacement of the national assembly?s personnel. In general these new ministers were more radical, and monarchien?s in particular came out badly from the election. This led to a much more hostile body than the National Assembly, and Louis would have a much tenser relationship with this new governing body. Louis had been effectively forced to sign the Constitution and was prisoner in his own capital. However he still held a power, greatest in the form of his suspensive veto, and his ability to appoint ministers. ...read more.


There was a variety of opinions as to what should be done with the royals, Verginaud wanted to save the constitutional monarchy, Brissot called for the removal of the monarch but for Louis to be kept alive as a bargaining chip, although there were many that called for the execution of Louis. Without the declaration of war there would never have been the added pressure that escalated the situation so quickly. It was the nearing threat of Austria and Prussian troops that caused such an impromptu attack on the Tuileries. However I do believe that the failure of the constitutional monarchy was inevitable. A more important reason than the declaration of war was Louis himself. Both his actions and his personality would play a decisive role in the ending of monarchy in France. Fundamentally he did not believe in the constitutional monarchy that he had been forced to accept. He believed that he lacked power in the new regime and was insulted by his new role. This dissatisfaction was what cause him to plea to fellow monarchs and nobles for support and the war was a repercussion of this. ...read more.


This really began at the flight to Varennes but was strengthened by events such as the massacre of the Champ de Mars. This was also aided by Louis himself, by his appointing of the Brissotin ministry, in order to cause war, they were given the opportunity to show how the government would be run by republicans. There were periods after Varennes, when Louis had his functions and prerogatives removed where ?it was as if there was no king in Paris? and things ran smoothly. The election of the legislative assembly brought in a more radical group of men calling for a republic, but even by then the king?s relationship with the people was breaking down. The popularity of Jacobin clubs increased an atmosphere of antimonarchism in the capital and a rise in propaganda. In conclusion Frances declaration of war did play an important role in deciding when the constitutional monarchy would end. However I believe more importantly than this was the response of Louis to changing events and his alienation of his own support. Which was supplemented by the changing atmosphere in Paris, and rise of radical support. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    The Prussian artillery was superior to the French equivalent and now the engineers operating them were now superior. The Prussian artillery superiority makes Prussia able to defeat the French because it allowed long range bombardment of French troops and supply lines, the bombardment of troops was important because man for

  2. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    Very quickly, the Estates-General lost the support of the Third Estate, and with it went any last hope, Marxists argue, of a peaceful end to Louis' troubles. In addition, the system of government was woefully organised: some provinces were vast, others small, some parlements presided over large areas, and some held power in just one small province.

  1. Vietnam war

    close down the transfer of supplies and men along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, take pressure off a fragile Cambodian government threatened by its own communist insurgency�11th of November 1968, Operation Commando Hunt was issued by the US, with the goal of disrupting supplies through the Ho Chi Minh Trail�30 million tonnes dropped on Cambodia's border.

  2. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    Committee Against Counter-revolution" to form 'an armed workers' militia to defend the revolution'12. It is well known in the present day that the Red Guard never fired shot in the defence of Petrograd, yet this fact was lost on the people of Petrograd.

  1. To What Extent Was a War Between Nazism and Bolshevism Inevitable?

    resigned; it is at this point that foreign relations took a downward turn. As Kershaw points out, "German foreign policy had no single, clear direction...it was characterised by Hitler's own dilettante opportunism"4. However in the years between the taking and consolidating of power Hitler also took and consolidated his thinking

  2. To what extent does the polarization of politics in France by 1824 demonstrate that ...

    examine the directly appointed executive, guaranteed the revolutionary land settlement, retained the Napoleonic administrative structure and promised equality before the law.. The ultra?s two main aims highly contradicted the charter with the censorship of political news and the continual return for their estates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work