• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the failure of the Socialist movement responsible for bringing Mussolini to power?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the failure of the Socialist movement responsible for bringing Mussolini to power? In 1919, Fascism was first set up as a small movement amongst many, but it expanded fast, especially after Mussolini changed his policies from the left to the right and by 1922 he was prime minister. Fascism was seen as an alternative to the popular Socialists, and many people simply supported Fascism to stop the Socialists getting into power. However, just being a rival to Socialism would not be enough to gain power, thus the Fascists attacked the Socialists and together with the many weaknesses of the Socialists, it caused the Socialists to lose a lot of popularity and help the Fascists. This decline of the Socialists was one cause of many which put the Fascists into power. This failure was to a great extent, responsible for bringing Mussolini into power. This was because the Fascists used violence against the Socialists to make it seem as if they were "saving" the people from them, and the failure of Socialism at the same time helped the Fascists continue their violence without much resistance. The Socialist movement had many weaknesses by 1921. Many of these happened internally and helped Mussolini take power. Firstly, it did not have a strong enough leader. In fact, one of these potential leaders could have been Mussolini but he was banished. ...read more.


This meant that almost everyone was unhappy with the issue of Fiume. This led to people wanting a change because they felt the Liberal government could not lead the country properly. These concerns were arguably justified, especially after considering how it dealt with the growth of Fascism. It did nothing to repel the Fascists but instead on many occasions helped them. For example, many agents of the government co-operated with the Fascists. Some of the generals in the army were also involved with the Fascist squads. The police in the cities did not fight them either. Giolitti made the situation even worse by including Fascists in his government, which made the Fascists stronger and weaken the opposition against them. These factors meant that the Liberal government was failing from within, which could only improve the chances of the Fascists gaining power. It was not just the failings of the Liberal regime which made people want change. The effects of the First World War were still prevalent. The war caused a "distorted economy".4 This was because of inflation, caused by the government printing notes. This was not followed by wage rises, so strikes were more popular, which meant that people wanted a change in government. This increased unemployment which affected the workers and many of the middle classes lost their savings. The petty bourgeoisie and peasants were unhappy at how they hadn't been rewarded for taking part in the war. ...read more.


However, the Fascists quickly stopped the strike in a day by using violence and then justifying it. This strike failed at a time when Socialism had already failed, but by doing this they gave Mussolini extra cards to play with and continue the Fascist movement. Ultimately, there is no doubt that the failure of the Socialists to a great extent helped Mussolini to get power. The PSI had 2 major opportunities to gain power in 1919 and to a lesser extent in 1921 but were not prepared to do so simply because they were against the Liberals. This, one of many of the Socialist's failures, helped the Fascists to continue their violence against the Socialists and led to Mussolini gaining power who was ironically their bitter enemy. The Socialists also helped by being unorganised, shown by the way they declined so quickly and were disunited, such as between Maximalists and Minimalists. No doubt other reasons also helped Mussolini, such as a weak king, his own strengths and the need for change amongst the country. But the decline of Socialism was the main factor, and without it Mussolini would not have gained power so quickly. 1 D. Mack Smith, Italy: A Modern history, 1969, p. 327 2 Major northern newspaper, Corriere della Sera, September 1920 3 A. Cassels, Fascist Italy, 1969, pp. 24-25 4 M. Blinkhorn, Mussolini and Fascist Italy, 1984, p. 9 5 P. Morgan, Italian Fascism 1919-45, 1995, p. 7 6 A. Cassels, Fascist Italy, 1969, p. 24-25 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Squadismo reacted to this by using violence to attack the socialist leagues, throughout 1920 and 1921 workers and peasants were intimidated into submission through beatings and torture. Mussolini needed the squads and their violence, as this enabled him to portray himself as the only man with the ability to end the violence.

  2. Features of Fascism

    The cult of the Duce thrived during the 1930s and was so until his fall in 1943. State propaganda had been geared up to provide the most possible indoctrination in newspapers and radio. The much repeated graffiti 'Mussolini is always right' appeared in villages and cities up and down the country.

  1. How successful was Mussolini in turning Italy into a nation of fascists?

    In 1926, a third of all history textbooks were banned - presumably those that didn't show Italy as the worlds most glorious nation. In 1928, the elementary schoolbook was standardised into one single volume, called the Libro Unico. Various other measures were introduced, such as banning dialects, and introducing military education.

  2. To What Extent Was The Failure Of The Socialist Movement Responsible For Bringing Mussolini ...

    I believe that Tom Behan bests describes this, when he comments that "the leadership believed that all they had to do to win this revolution was wait for it to drop into their laps". In contrast, Mussolini and the Fascists took advantage of every opportunity presented to them and fought

  1. Free essay

    Chartist Movement: Change and Continuity

    One source shows that the middle class status is one that everyone is trying to strive for, 'not a man among you worth halfpenny a week that is not anxious to elevate himself among them.' This shows that people would improve their social status if they could and it is also defending the middle class status.

  2. Did the Fascists take power more through their own strengths or the weaknesses of ...

    through violent intervention. It also attracted those who wanted revolutionary change, as they had become disillusioned with the lack of a definitive strategy on the part of the socialists. While it might seem that this situation was created entirely through the failings of the socialists, Mussolini was quick to take

  1. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    of the Ghettos and camps, and the mass-murders of the Einstazgruppen, were far more important in shaping the Holocaust than any formal meetings discussing it. It was acts of murder like these that allowed the Nazi's to push their ?genocidal? boundaries even further, among other goals, it was the overall

  2. To what extent was Austria responsible for the failure of Italian revolutionaries in the ...

    Finally, in the Papal States Metternich?s army defeated the liberal rebels, ending the constitutional government using violent methods to show their strength. Despite temporary successes of most revolutionaries in creating provisional governments and constitutions, Austria managed to abolish these all within a year for all states, showing some significance in the failure of the revolutions from 1820-37.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work