• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazis in the years 1928-1933 the result of propaganda and electioneering?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazi's in the years 1928-1933 the result of propaganda and electioneering? This period of time saw the Nazis spiral into power through the collapse of the global economy and the turn to extremism. The crisis had shrouded over Germany and had left the country vulnerable with an undesirable deficit and an indecisive Weimar coalition government to find a solution. Constitution of Germany also contributed to the surge of support for the Nazis; Article 48 left the Weimar Republic subject to the President's authority. Combined with the heavy distribution of precision contrived electioneering and propaganda, the Nazis formulated a recipe for seizing power. Beneath the efficient Nazis and their strength as a catch-all party, there lay a severe problem with the country's governing body: the Weimar Republic. Firstly, in the coalition's infancy in1930, President Hindenburg had immediately cut their authority through the exercising of Article 48 rule by decree. By law this allowed the President to exert ultimate authority and could amend and make statute law. For the Nazis this was the basis of their uprising; dissolving the strength of the existing government meant increased dissatisfaction with the public who, during austere times, needed decisive leadership. ...read more.


How this benefitted the Nazis however was different; in extreme times, extreme measures are called for usually by the public. Because the economy in Germany from 1929-1932 was disastrous, the political parties with the promise for most significant change were favoured; giving the Nazis a chance to catch support. Discontent amongst the population as their currency became almost worthless, leant itself to radicalism and the Nazis; their rise in support was synonymous with the economic downturn. Had the financial crisis improved over the years or had the coalition government been more successful, then the Nazis would have struggled to have come to power because the public only looked to them in the most desperate of times. To say that it was the Great Depression singularly which resulted in their increased electoral support is arguable; a more resounding judgment is that the inefficient Weimar government was to blame. The economic climate may, not alone, have been enough for the mass population to turn to a far right-wing party, but with the culmination of the government it provided the ingredients for a surge in support for the Nazi party. The internal structure and organisation of the Nazi party also had a telling effect on the attraction of voters, despite the external conditions. ...read more.


Secondly what also aided their success were the subjects of their propaganda. Knowing their ideology suited strata of society, Nazis targeted farmers, families, workers, women and many more groups with knowledge that they could promote policies for that area and attract their vote. Good examples of this were the posters aimed at farmers talking of rural support, and the cartoon of family, idealising them and outlining the benefits of a prosperous family. Both electioneering and propaganda undoubtedly helped the Nazi cause. Hitler himself was a successful tool in which people were attracted, as well as the volume of propaganda it was unsurprising that they eventually achieved power. Propaganda and electioneering certainly were successful in the Nazi rise in support during 1928-1933, but had it not been for the existing problems then they would not have been so effective. The global economy lead to severe discontent around Germany and left the nation in ruins; the government in office was not of high enough calibre to satisfy their needs and a solution was sought after. Nazi support ultimately sprouted from the weakness of the coalition; a stronger government could have rode roughshod and kept power, yet through the worsening of the crisis and the powerful weapon of propaganda, Hitler and the Nazis were able to gain control of Germany; one of the most infamous regimes in history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    The inclusion of terror into Collectivisation was intended from the start, again to further Stalin's hold over Russia. " Stalin subordinates everything to his lust for power,"20 Collectivisation also had its technocratic influences, to provide Russia with enough exports to buy machinery and industrialise, in order to prevent war from the west.

  2. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    Also Stolper agreed with the point that "Hitler never contemplated a long drawn-out war"37. Therefore, the World War that Hitler had mistakenly launched was not what he was planning for. It happened because of his own miscalculation - he infuriated Britain and France to intervene when he invaded Poland.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Confronted by incriminating evidence, many dodged behind a series of rationalizations. The most popular was that they merely followed orders and that Hitler or Himmler was really the guilty one. It was, of course, convenient for the top Nazis, as it was to some degree for all Germans, to blame

  2. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    ensure a rapid end to German democracy while adhering to the law at all times. From 1924, despite prior severe economic difficulties, the Weimar Republic seemed to be moving towards a brighter future thanks to the appointment of Gustav Stresemann as Chancellor and Foreign Minister.

  1. To what extent did Hitlers Policies attract working class support between 1933 and 1939?

    However "nominal hourly wages in 1933 were 97 per cent of...1932"5 and in this regard the 'miracle' was not realized in tangible economic terms. Therefore as early as 1935 SOPADE reported economic uncertainty placed "great strain on the mental strength".6 The SOPADE reports naturally contained a sentiment opposed to the regime as an extension of their political endeavors.

  2. Why did Hindenburg appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933?

    and each area had a leader (Gauleiter) who was appointed by Hitler to carry out his orders. They opened up groups for young people, women, students, lawyers and workers which help to bring a sense of community to certain areas (Volksgemeinshaft).

  1. Hitler's use of propaganda.

    He denounced as hopelessly stupid those German political parties and movements that wanted to reverse the 1919 Treaty of Versailles and reclaim what Germany had then lost. Instead, Hitler argued that Germany needed large amounts of territory in which to expand, a need that he would meet by conquering territory and expelling or killing the local populations17.

  2. To what extent did Nazi support increase during the years 1923-33?

    This is shown in the national vote in 1924; the Nazi?s claimed 7% of the vote compared to the massive 10% they had in their first election. This now put the Nazi party on level with other parties like the DDP and the DVP.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work