To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazis in the years 1928-1933 the result of propaganda and electioneering?

Authors Avatar

To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazi’s in the years 1928-1933 the result of propaganda and electioneering?

This period of time saw the Nazis spiral into power through the collapse of the global economy and the turn to extremism. The crisis had shrouded over Germany and had left the country vulnerable with an undesirable deficit and an indecisive Weimar coalition government to find a solution. Constitution of Germany also contributed to the surge of support for the Nazis; Article 48 left the Weimar Republic subject to the President’s authority. Combined with the heavy distribution of precision contrived electioneering and propaganda, the Nazis formulated a recipe for seizing power.

Beneath the efficient Nazis and their strength as a catch-all party, there lay a severe problem with the country’s governing body: the Weimar Republic. Firstly, in the coalition’s infancy in1930, President Hindenburg had immediately cut their authority through the exercising of Article 48 rule by decree. By law this allowed the President to exert ultimate authority and could amend and make statute law. For the Nazis this was the basis of their uprising; dissolving the strength of the existing government meant increased dissatisfaction with the public who, during austere times, needed decisive leadership. Yet in order for the Nazis to completely come to power, there needed to be additional problems with the government. The sheer nature of the Weimar government contributed to their demise and Nazi success. By nature, coalition governments are indecisive through the continual consultation that must take place between each party which it consists of. Because the process of key decision making and policy outlining was prolonged it meant the German public were disgruntled; what they needed was one party, one set of guidelines and a solution to the weak government. It can be said that the nature of the Weimar Republic contributed to its own downfall and the Nazis resultant rise; in response to the indecisive coalition, the public favoured the regimented ideology of the Nazis. Both the collapse of democracy through Article 48 and the lack of policy making made the collapse of the Weimar the most influential factor behind the Nazi rise in support. Had a stronger government been in power, without the hindrance of an interfering President or the need for continual consultation between parties, then the course of history may have been considerably different; public desires would perhaps have been met, thus giving Nazis not enough support to ever achieve power. In summary, the Nazi soar of support would not have been entirely possible without the incumbent government facing detrimental issues, a coalition in a period of a struggle was inadequate, and therefore the Nazis were recognised as the solution.

Join now!

Although the initial weakness of the Weimar allowed the Nazis to attract support, their policies and stance towards the economy were also crucial. The Great Wall Street Crash in 1929 left ***** unemployed following the American banking crisis as the banks demanded money borrowed to be paid back and shares were plummeting in price. The ramifications the Great Depression had during this period was exceptional. Germany was left in bankruptcy as the slump came after the Treaty of Versailles which had also subjected them to financial misery – having to pay back the Allies £6billion. How this benefitted the Nazis ...

This is a preview of the whole essay