• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was The Late Middle Ages A Time Of Unrest In Europe

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Was The Late Middle Ages A Time Of Unrest In Europe? As the end of the Middle Ages approached, it was clear that Europe was evolving and advancing, but this did not necessarily mean that it brought stability. In fact, it had quite the opposite effect. The major rulers of Europe desired fame and fortune, and were willing to fight ever more expensive wars to gain it. This greatly affected the now growing European Economy, which in turn affected the rich, the poor, and the industrial state of Europe. The Church as ever had it's role to play in the stability of both individual countries and Europe as a whole, and with new inventions changing the way that the society functioned as a whole, it was likely that a long period of unrest would be established. It is arguable that Europe was in a more stable position during the Late Middle Ages than is commonly accepted. For example, despite being divided into many individual areas, the Holy Roman Empire had an elected Emperor who had the highest status in Europe, and a German parliament. Theoretically, this ensured that there was a stable figure at the head which was able to oversee the condition of the entire Empire, along with a parliament that would be able to resolve any issues that arose. Combined with the Princes that ruled over the different areas of the Holy Roman Empire, it is possible to believe that a workable system had been formed. ...read more.


This could have had dangerous ramifications for Europe as a whole, and Pope Leo X wanted to prevent this. As Charles was already ruler of Spain and the Netherlands, he had now become the dominant power in Europe. With one person having such a large influence in Europe, the stability of the continent was always going to be at risk. Finally, attempts were made to centralise the power to the Emperor. However, the Princes were not willing to surrender the power and the Holy Roman Empire remained divided. If centralisation of power had been successful a more stable Europe would have been a possibility, but without this, the existing divides remained and an unstable country and continent resulted. As well as the instability being generated by the Holy Roman Empire, Western Europe was having its own problems, especially between France and Britain. The long wars, including the 100 Years War, were having a damaging effect on both the condition of the individual countries and the long-term relationship between the countries. With two of Europe's major countries continually in conflict, the general stability of Europe would always be at risk. Also, as well as the wars with France, England was having its own internal problems. The War of the Roses is one of the most important aspects of English history, and the volatility it caused within the country radiated to the other countries of Europe. Leading on from this, the wars between France and Italy, and Spain and the Holy Roman Empire were always going to be damaging to the stability of Europe. ...read more.


This created an even larger bridge between the rich and the poor, which is an obvious cause of unrest. The poor people were not happy with how they were being exploited for people such as the Fugger's gain, and they were especially unhappy with how they were made to pay high levels of taxes when the extremely rich families did not have to. Inflation, and especially the Great Price Rise, were also large causes of turbulence in the late Middle Ages. As the economy continued to grow through the early 16th Century and populations rose, there was a greater demand for goods, so accompanied with the increase of money in Europe, prices were able to rise. Wages were not rising though, leading to poverty for many individuals. The vast amounts of people who were negatively affected by this felt greatly aggrieved, feeling that wages should be rising with the inflation, but when they did not, conflict was always a possibility. Accompanied with these consequences were the negative effects of Monopolies and Debasements, and it is clear that all of these combined effects were creating a great deal of unrest within Europe. To conclude, the late Middle Ages were certainly a time of unrest in Europe. With so many divisions within countries, it was unlikely that stability and co-operation between other countries would be possible. The changes in religious ideologies, the economy, the increasing number and growing sizes of wars and society as a whole were creating tension between countries and ultimately unrest throughout the continent. It was clear that beliefs were changing, and that they were not going to change without considerable disturbance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    Over the course of the next 8 years, fighting would ensue between the Grand Alliance and France, with the fighting mostly in the Spanish Netherlands, the Rhineland, and Catalonia. By 1697, both sides were desperate for peace and peace talks were about to commence.

  2. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    There was a shortage in much needed items such as boots, ammunition and medicines and were a high number of casualties and major defeats in 1914 to 1915. Many soldiers who had served prior to the war had been killed and were replaced by peasants who were not as loyal.

  1. Why was Charles V unable to prevent the spread of protestantism?

    In addition the Council of Trent was ineffective as it only reaffirmed traditional Catholic doctrine rather than addressing the reason for much of Luther's support; the corruption and abuses present in the Catholic Church. Charles relied much on cooperation from the Church, and their failure to resolve problems meant that Charles' efforts to stop Protestantism were of little use.

  2. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    (J Heb) It is Katherine Woodroffe's view, however, that the welfare state removed barriers to aid and de-stigmatised poverty. A tangible improvement in living conditions and mark of Labour's success is shown in Rowntree's reports of 1936 and 1950, which showed a decrease of primary poverty from 36% to 2% in York.

  1. How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold ...

    Therefore, the policy of Glasnost was quite effective in it's aims, it did what it was supposed to, but it contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, which is not what Gorbachev had wanted. However, maybe the collapse of the Soviet Union was needed in order to bring an end to the Cold War.

  2. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    'Repression is generally seen as more effective in the Soviet union than in Tsarist Russia because of the modern technology, organisational structures and communications,9 all things that were made possible as a continuation of frameworks established by the Tsarist rulers.

  1. The First English Civil War

    Hampden's advice was undoubtedly premature. A Sedan or Worcester was not within the power of the Parliamentarians of 1642. In Napoleon's words: "one only manoeuvres around a fixed point", and the city levies at that time were certainly not, vis-�-vis Rupert's cavalry, a fixed point.

  2. The Roman Catholic Church was becoming increasingly unpopular in the Holy Roman Empire before ...

    Roman Catholicism, or at least the Church in this period, did not seem worthy to be trusted. More than anything, the Roman Catholic Church seemed like a sham. People?s disapproval of the Church grew and cries of reformation became ever louder.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work