• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the nuclear arms race a more stabilising factor in the cold war from 1949 to 1963?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the nuclear arms race a more stabilising factor in the cold war from 1949 to 1963? From the period of 1949 up until 1963 saw increasing developments in nuclear technology by both the two superpowers, the USA and USSR. The 'race 'meant that both superpowers aimed to match each other and even gain the upper hand in terms of nuclear missile technology. Nuclear arms were seen as a form of scare tactic against the other superpower as both felt threatened by each other's ideological capability. It was also used as a form of defence mechanism in case of future attack however, the power and destruction of the weapons in which these countries created would have proved fatal not only for the opposing country but for the world. The nuclear arms race has been argued that it stabilised relations between the countries especially after the Cuban missile crisis although there is much evidence that proves otherwise, in which relations between the soviets and the United States were as tense as ever. ...read more.


This policy however was used by both parties which in essence mad the whole of the period of time a very tense time. The false threats could be seen as a stabilising factor as both parties were not going to use the weapons, only as a scare tactic which would lead to an increase in communication between the countries. On the other side, threatening to destroy the opposing superpower could be seen as unsettling the relations even more than it already was. M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction) could also be a Stabilising factor in this period as it caused both sides to rethink their strategies. Both sides had enough nuclear weaponry to annihilate the other and to even counter-strike when hit first. Both sides knew that using this strategy would prove too costly so for their own need they needed another approach. A more flexible approach in which the sides would use smaller, targeted missiles achieving to hit a specific area would be more worthwhile as it would limit the amount of action and devastation that the arms could bring. ...read more.


They were literally hours from nuclear war. However there other factor that played into the formation of the treaty. The Soviet Union were in economic turmoil especially when they were paying almost a third of their GMP on arms. America was also in turmoil especially with the Vietnam War heating up and domestic issue of civil rights. In conclusion, after looking at the period of 1949-1963, the nuclear arms race was a stabilising factor in the cold war although things could have been the complete opposite. The risk of using Brinksmanship could have ended in war and eventual devastation of the world. Both countries, for their own sake needed to come to some agreement to limit the arms. By using the 'hot line' telephone link both superpowers could prevent each other with great speed which helped misunderstanding especially when Khrushchev had a very unpredictable mind. The test ban treaty of 63' also helped limit the use of unsettling use of the weapons but it dragged other powerful nations such as China and France into the mix when they disagreed against the treaty. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did the nuclear arms race make the world a more dangerous ...

    3 star(s)

    Followed by an even more destructive weapon; the lithium bomb exploded by the soviets in 1953. Under Eisenhower and Dulles who understood clearly the dangers of a nuclear war and were hard-line communists, both together were more than willing to go the brink of war.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    In some ways, these were a series of quid pro quos. In exchange for the second front, Russia had made concessions on issues of critical importance to Britain and the United States.

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    as it involved no military action whatsoever on the part of the United States. This however, was a negative aspect of the plan in itself, as it might portray the United States as being a weak country, afraid to take action.xl Another advantage to this solution was that it would

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    He also ordered the withdrawing of Soviet troops from Hungary, to try and calm the situation. However, popular protests continued. * Nagy set up a new government, which included non-communists, and then on 30th October announced free elections and, on 2nd November, Hungary's withdrawal from the Warsaw Pact.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    negotiation and compromise with Stalin � forced to resign as Secretary of Commerce Sep. 20 Nov. 4-Dec. 12 - Council of Foreign Ministers meeting in New York � Byrnes and Molotov agree on the minor treaties with Italy, Rumania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Finland. � but Byrnes signs treaties in U.S. Jan.

  2. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    The other side of this is that the Soviet Union became more confident, and it was this confidence which could be said to have caused the Cuban Missile crisis, which almost sparked a full-scale nuclear conflict between the two countries.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The parasitic PLO state in Lebanon was a subversives' honeypot. Here they had licence to shoot and kill in an alien world, with no consequence to themselves. Would-be heroes of 'the Revolution', playboys and playgirls of terrorism from West Germany, Italy, Scandinavia and the Netherlands, came to dress up, strut, blow up, and gun down.

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    keen to not allow the other to exert its influence over the region * Israel was established as an independent country in 1948 with the British withdraw from Palestine * British troops were withdrawn from Egypt in 1955 despite continued Ango-French ownership of the Suez Canal * The developing hostility

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work