• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the passing of the "Emancipation Proclamation" (1862/3) determined by Lincoln's desire to undermine the Southern economy?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the passing of the "Emancipation Proclamation" (1862/3) determined by Lincoln's desire to undermine the Southern economy? Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation completed the most significant u-turn in American history. Months before, in the Crittendon Resolution, Lincoln had explicitly stated that Union forces would not target Southern plantations, and that the South would be welcomed back into the Union with or without the slave system. At this point, Lincoln regarded slavery as a potentially divisive issue and, as noted by the historians Johansson and Hofstatder, aimed to avoid anything that would associate him as being either for or against its abolition. However, by 1863, Northern forces had discovered the impracticality of defeating the Confederates whilst essentially upholding the slave trade in the Southern land they occupied. It became imperative that the slave trade collapsed. However, while this factor would have influenced President Lincoln considerably, a more pressing concern was to prevent European intervention. Any such interference would have evened out the enormous disparity between North and South, dragging the North into a lengthier and costlier conflict. More significant than this, though, was Lincoln's need to justify the sacrifices already incurred by the Union forces. To do this, Lincoln used the Emancipation Proclamation to turn the Civil War into a crusade: both for America, and for God. It is this final factor that proved the most influential. ...read more.


The war had crippled the Northern economy and slowed the growth of its industry, creating an uncertain atmosphere amongst investors and consumers alike. Moreover, there was not a family untouched by the horrors of War. At the Battle of Gettysburg, for example, more Americans died in five days than in twenty-five years in Vietnam. After 1862, there was for the first time a reluctance to fight; to weary Northerners, the war seemed devoid of meaning, and thus the casualties appeared pointless. For Lincoln, this switch in public opinion was highly significant. With an election approaching in 1864, it was essential that he was able to present the electorate with a return for their losses. He therefore switched the aim of the War from Unionism to abolitionism: if he could eradicate slavery before the election, Lincoln could more easily defend the war effort. At the same time, it was essential that Lincoln instilled in the North a motivation that would unite them towards a single end and give them a sense of purpose. At the Battle of Antiteam, a bloody Northern victory during the autumn of 1862, he therefore declared that any states opposing the Union by January of the next year would have their slaves actively freed. In order to justify this switch, Lincoln portrayed the Civil War as a crusade against slavery, sighting both American and Christian causes. ...read more.


This factor is therefore more important than the undermining of the Southern economy. However, it must be considered secondary to the ideological factor, as Britain and France may not have invaded even without Lincoln's Declaration. Even so, the opportunity of eradicating any possibility of intervention would certainly been a considerable issue in Lincoln's decision. It is clear that the prospect of undermining the Confederate economy had an important impact on Lincoln's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. Any weakening of that economy would aid the Northern war effort by slowing the Southern production rate and decreasing their work force. However, a more important concern was that of foreign intervention: in making the War about slavery, Lincoln was able to deter the British and French governments from invading on the Confederate side. More important than this, though, was the appearance of the War to the Northern electorate. In declaring that the War was God's "punishment" for America's sin of slavery, and that it undermined the forefathers' ambitions, Lincoln encouraged both Puritan and Nationalist Northerners to support the Northern cause. This factor, impacting as it did on the 1864 election, can be seen to be the one that most influenced Lincoln. Through this cosmetic alteration of the war effort, Lincoln's aims transcended his original desire for Unionism. After the Proclamation, Lincoln's aspirations developed from this simple pledge to an ambition of winning the war, the election- and the slaves' freedom. It turned out to be his definitive victory. 28/2/2005 Luke Bullen NPS 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. The abolition of slavery 1833.

    White Missionaries had an importance on the decision, as they were the ones who acted as a trigger to the rebellions and were necessary as they were the ones who spread news about the humanitarian campaigns around the plantations raising the hopes of slaves leading them to rebellions.

  2. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    However, as nationalism was probably more important to the North this meant that they saw Lincoln as their candidate as he represented their views. After the election the Confederacy was created, and many of the South felt driven to join .

  1. To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy consistent and planned?

    Indeed it may have simply been camouflage to mislead his critics into thinking that he too desired peace in Europe as tension to the east of the continent was significantly reduced. Hitler was successfully reinventing himself as peacemaker. However policy toward Austria would again see his authenticity questioned when in 1934 the Austrian Chancellor was assassinated.

  2. What is the short term significance of the Emancipation Proclamation?

    In contrast a source by Pleas. Smith2 proves that many former slaves were mentally bound to be rather dead then accepting brutality. The source stated that 'a negro was caught armed and killed' in the short term significance this shows that the emancipation proclamation perhaps enriched Black Americans being rebellious, being armed and ready to fight, accept death with honour.

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    landlord was obliged not to raise rents arbitrarily, and was restrained from evicting the tenant without just compensation for the expenses the latter had incurred on improvements made on the owner's land. This Act extended the legalisation of this custom to the whole of Ireland.

  2. How did the southern states deny equality to African Americans even after Emancipation

    The amendment became practically ineffective as proven by the ?slaughter house? decision of 1873, which demonstrated that one?s civil rights may be protected in a national capacity, but this however did not constitute to the rights being protected by the state as state citizenship granted rights were different.

  1. How far was the USAs military involvement in Korea a desire to defend democracy?

    Within this speech it was stated that South Korea in fact lay outside the American defensive perimeter, highlighting to the North Koreans that there is a high possibility America would not defend the south from an attack. Key principles and policies that guided US Foreign Policy during this period also help us explain the US involvement in Korea.

  2. What was the short term significance of the maintenance of slavery in the southern ...

    was slavery related owing to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. His policies and views on slavery and ever growing power of the North scared the South into the prospect of ?being controlled? by the North and having to abolish slavery.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work