• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to a) the growth of the Zollverein, b) Bismarck's diplomacy and wars?"

Extracts from this document...


IB History - Bismarck and the Unification of Germany "To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to a) the growth of the Zollverein, b) Bismarck's diplomacy and wars?" Unification was a fervent desire amongst the Germans, and with or without the Zollverein, Germany was predisposed to unification. However, once the Zollverein came into being, it played an immensely important role - Whilst the political unification of Germany was being secured by military force of the unshakable Prussian army, the basis of the unification had been laid down years before 1871. This basis was neither military or political, but economic. Bismarck provided the role as the facilitator and the Zollverein was a catalyst towards unification; it showed the people the benefits, thus paved the path for unification and stirred the German national feelings and common cultural threads. The Prussian new enlarged Custom's Union, the Zollverein, was the beginning of unity despite the fact that it was an economic move, and not a political one. Although the Zollverein merely started out for economic reasons, political unification of Germany would eventually be brought about by Prussia. ...read more.


What he wanted was different to what the liberals wanted from the 1848 revolution; "a free union under a Prussian king stripped of his autocratic powers."[2][2] In reality, Bismarck's actions then, determined the future of his cherished Prussia. As Minister-President, and with the destiny of Prussia in his hands, he believed that he was carrying out God's will by expanding Prussia. In reality, Bismarck was the facilitator of the unification. The German's wanted a united Germany, which was not achieved by peaceful means in 1848 by the liberals. Bismarck didn't believe in "speeches and majority decisions" to answer the "great questions of the day", but "blood and iron" to do so.[3][3] This phrase he stated to the Parliament was unquestionably prophetic. It was by this phrase "blood and iron" that events mirrored in the following years. He was determined to make Prussia stronger politically, economically and militarily than any possible enemy. This strength acquired by The Zollverein, reorganising the Prussian army, driving liberals from their official position, and collecting taxes to fund the army forms would achieve Bismarck's dream of a united Germany under Prussian control. ...read more.


This Franco-Prussian War is a clear example of Bismarck's diplomatic brilliance; He had prepared well for this war, securing the "requisite political conditions"[5][5]. With Russia bribed not to interfere, Italy an ally, Britain - isolated, and Austria having just made peace with Germany, France was isolated from any help. This allowed Bismarck to send his troops in to defeat France and further secure the unification of Germany. Political Unification was destined to occur in Germany with or without the Zollverein, but the question was when and how?. The introduction of the Zollverein laid down a base and provided a path towards unification and it brought the German people and their cultural threads together. It was immensely important in economic development, and secured a Prussian dominance economically over Austria. Bismarck's diplomacy also played a significant role towards unification. His determination and character were assets in accomplishing his goals. If his true Junker sense of service towards the Prussian state was not present, Prussia would not have been as strong militarily nor economically. And without his determination to challenge Austria for military supremacy in Germany he would not have seen his giant step toward German unity. In many ways Bismarck's role as facilitator assured the eventual triumph. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far did the Zollverein play a apart in the Unification of Germany?

    Many turned against Prussia, deciding to fight alongside Austria, and the Northern states that did (or just didn't let Prussia in, such as Frankfurt)

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    Bismarck's next step appeared to be dealing with France and just as the Austro-Prussian War was a product of the Danish War, so it laid a basis for the Franco-Prussian War.11 The North German Confederation, created after Austria's defeat was a provisional solution, maintained until Kleindeutschland could be achieved.

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    Austria was decreasing in power from the years 1840-1870; there is considerable evidence to show this. For example Prussia's key output of Coal in 1870 was 23.3 whilst Austria's was considerably lower at 6.3. Also Austria's decrease in power can be seen in military numbers in 1850 the Austrian military numbered 434,000 but by 1870 it had dwindled to 252,000.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    We ........... Conclusion It is possible to argue that Bismarck did not make Germany: rather Germany made Bismarck. A variety of factors e.g. German nationalism, Prussian economic growth, the international situation in the 1860's and the Prussian army, were

  1. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    This development caused outrage in Europe, as none of the countries were happy with the new situation apart from Russia. So Bismarck decided that he should take charge and change the situation to please every country in Europe a bit.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    of the Baltic States, he sacrificed them to the needs of his Italian and Russian alliances with indifference. So long as good relations with Poland were necessary to his foreign policy he showed little interest in Poland's German minority. But when it suited his purpose to make the 'intolerable wrongs'

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    One of the downfalls of Napoleon was his inability to relay information quickly enough and this was shown at the Battle of Waterloo when he was unable to get contact with Ney before 12pm thus giving time for Wellington to prepare.

  2. To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany an entrenched authoritarian state?

    was utilised by to give Adolf Hitler a lenient jail sentence and can be seen to have had a substantial effect upon the future of Germany. This shows how the prevalence and power of the elites continued, as did their right wing influence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work