• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to a) the growth of the Zollverein, b) Bismarck's diplomacy and wars?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB History - Bismarck and the Unification of Germany "To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to a) the growth of the Zollverein, b) Bismarck's diplomacy and wars?" Unification was a fervent desire amongst the Germans, and with or without the Zollverein, Germany was predisposed to unification. However, once the Zollverein came into being, it played an immensely important role - Whilst the political unification of Germany was being secured by military force of the unshakable Prussian army, the basis of the unification had been laid down years before 1871. This basis was neither military or political, but economic. Bismarck provided the role as the facilitator and the Zollverein was a catalyst towards unification; it showed the people the benefits, thus paved the path for unification and stirred the German national feelings and common cultural threads. The Prussian new enlarged Custom's Union, the Zollverein, was the beginning of unity despite the fact that it was an economic move, and not a political one. Although the Zollverein merely started out for economic reasons, political unification of Germany would eventually be brought about by Prussia. ...read more.

Middle

What he wanted was different to what the liberals wanted from the 1848 revolution; "a free union under a Prussian king stripped of his autocratic powers."[2][2] In reality, Bismarck's actions then, determined the future of his cherished Prussia. As Minister-President, and with the destiny of Prussia in his hands, he believed that he was carrying out God's will by expanding Prussia. In reality, Bismarck was the facilitator of the unification. The German's wanted a united Germany, which was not achieved by peaceful means in 1848 by the liberals. Bismarck didn't believe in "speeches and majority decisions" to answer the "great questions of the day", but "blood and iron" to do so.[3][3] This phrase he stated to the Parliament was unquestionably prophetic. It was by this phrase "blood and iron" that events mirrored in the following years. He was determined to make Prussia stronger politically, economically and militarily than any possible enemy. This strength acquired by The Zollverein, reorganising the Prussian army, driving liberals from their official position, and collecting taxes to fund the army forms would achieve Bismarck's dream of a united Germany under Prussian control. ...read more.

Conclusion

This Franco-Prussian War is a clear example of Bismarck's diplomatic brilliance; He had prepared well for this war, securing the "requisite political conditions"[5][5]. With Russia bribed not to interfere, Italy an ally, Britain - isolated, and Austria having just made peace with Germany, France was isolated from any help. This allowed Bismarck to send his troops in to defeat France and further secure the unification of Germany. Political Unification was destined to occur in Germany with or without the Zollverein, but the question was when and how?. The introduction of the Zollverein laid down a base and provided a path towards unification and it brought the German people and their cultural threads together. It was immensely important in economic development, and secured a Prussian dominance economically over Austria. Bismarck's diplomacy also played a significant role towards unification. His determination and character were assets in accomplishing his goals. If his true Junker sense of service towards the Prussian state was not present, Prussia would not have been as strong militarily nor economically. And without his determination to challenge Austria for military supremacy in Germany he would not have seen his giant step toward German unity. In many ways Bismarck's role as facilitator assured the eventual triumph. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    PAGE 28 3. Whatever view is taken about the 'inevitability' of German unification, it is clear that Bismarck's actions had a definite influence on its nature, but what actions did Bismarck take in order to contend for responsibility for German unification?

  2. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    The treaty stated that if a fourth country attacked one of the countries involved in the treaty, the others would adopt a state of benevolent neutrality. This settled the problems for the moment but did not remove the causes of rivalry between Russia and Austria Hungary.

  1. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    The Prussian success in the 3 wars was essential in the unification of Germany. Bismarck skilful diplomacy and strength of character were crucial in all of the 3 circumstances. The army reforms triggered by Bismarck begun the development of the iron and coal industries in the Rhineland and the steel industry.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    He reacted to problems as they manifested rather than avoiding them. Also, from this it seems as though, Bismarck caused many of the problems. Perhaps the most important argument supporting the intentionalist viewpoint is Bismarck's role as the "honest broker" at the 'Congress of Berlin' in 1878, he was more interested in European peace than German Empire building.

  1. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    This made a total of 700000. The French, in comparison had only 224000 men, including those in action in the southern and eastern borders. Only 50000 were ready for service. The odds were not in favour of napoleon. The war machines of four major powers and many other small countries were mobilizing against him.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    One of Hitler's most habitual devices was to place himself on the defensive, to accuse those who opposed or obstructed him of aggression and malice, and to pass rapidly from a tone of outraged innocence to the full thunders of moral indignation.

  1. Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815?

    Also some stories from the Romantic Movement spread after the Revolution which glorified Germany?s heroic past encouraging unity. Furthermore, the French revolution was based on the concept of the liberal idea that the law should treat everyone fairly and equally, and as unity could cause so much damage, the German

  2. To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany an entrenched authoritarian state?

    The traditional elite were becoming challenged by the new elite industrialist bankers and rising upper middle class. Wehler?s theory suggests there was a bringing together of these two dominant social elites, and so it was the elites pulling the strings rather than the Kaiser.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work