• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to a) the growth of the Zollverein, b) Bismarck's diplomacy and wars?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB History - Bismarck and the Unification of Germany "To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to a) the growth of the Zollverein, b) Bismarck's diplomacy and wars?" Unification was a fervent desire amongst the Germans, and with or without the Zollverein, Germany was predisposed to unification. However, once the Zollverein came into being, it played an immensely important role - Whilst the political unification of Germany was being secured by military force of the unshakable Prussian army, the basis of the unification had been laid down years before 1871. This basis was neither military or political, but economic. Bismarck provided the role as the facilitator and the Zollverein was a catalyst towards unification; it showed the people the benefits, thus paved the path for unification and stirred the German national feelings and common cultural threads. The Prussian new enlarged Custom's Union, the Zollverein, was the beginning of unity despite the fact that it was an economic move, and not a political one. Although the Zollverein merely started out for economic reasons, political unification of Germany would eventually be brought about by Prussia. ...read more.

Middle

What he wanted was different to what the liberals wanted from the 1848 revolution; "a free union under a Prussian king stripped of his autocratic powers."[2][2] In reality, Bismarck's actions then, determined the future of his cherished Prussia. As Minister-President, and with the destiny of Prussia in his hands, he believed that he was carrying out God's will by expanding Prussia. In reality, Bismarck was the facilitator of the unification. The German's wanted a united Germany, which was not achieved by peaceful means in 1848 by the liberals. Bismarck didn't believe in "speeches and majority decisions" to answer the "great questions of the day", but "blood and iron" to do so.[3][3] This phrase he stated to the Parliament was unquestionably prophetic. It was by this phrase "blood and iron" that events mirrored in the following years. He was determined to make Prussia stronger politically, economically and militarily than any possible enemy. This strength acquired by The Zollverein, reorganising the Prussian army, driving liberals from their official position, and collecting taxes to fund the army forms would achieve Bismarck's dream of a united Germany under Prussian control. ...read more.

Conclusion

This Franco-Prussian War is a clear example of Bismarck's diplomatic brilliance; He had prepared well for this war, securing the "requisite political conditions"[5][5]. With Russia bribed not to interfere, Italy an ally, Britain - isolated, and Austria having just made peace with Germany, France was isolated from any help. This allowed Bismarck to send his troops in to defeat France and further secure the unification of Germany. Political Unification was destined to occur in Germany with or without the Zollverein, but the question was when and how?. The introduction of the Zollverein laid down a base and provided a path towards unification and it brought the German people and their cultural threads together. It was immensely important in economic development, and secured a Prussian dominance economically over Austria. Bismarck's diplomacy also played a significant role towards unification. His determination and character were assets in accomplishing his goals. If his true Junker sense of service towards the Prussian state was not present, Prussia would not have been as strong militarily nor economically. And without his determination to challenge Austria for military supremacy in Germany he would not have seen his giant step toward German unity. In many ways Bismarck's role as facilitator assured the eventual triumph. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    PAGE 28 3. Whatever view is taken about the 'inevitability' of German unification, it is clear that Bismarck's actions had a definite influence on its nature, but what actions did Bismarck take in order to contend for responsibility for German unification?

  2. How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing ...

    Bismarck saw a small chance of capitalising on the Polish revolt; he decided to send extra troops into the Prussian part of Poland and sealed off the border with Russian Poland. As well as this Bismarck offered the Russians military co-operation in dealing with the revolt thinking he could earn

  1. To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between ...

    classes believe this to be a suicidal course, and they eventually prevailed with a pro-Prussian line, but only economically. So the importance of the Zollverien is debatable as it did not provide protection for Prussian industries nor create a unified German economy.

  2. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    Bismarck was agile. The plan to instate Hollenzo over Madrid backfired and he was forced to back down. Bismarck once again used his genius, undeterred by this failure in his plan he used the Elms telegram to provoke the French into declaring war upon Germany, once again making France appear as the aggressor.

  1. To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important ...

    An alliance was also signed with Italy resulting in Austria having to fight a war on two fronts. Prussia had a stunning success. Bismarck quickly started a peace treaty, only pushing Austria out of Germany, he knew since the treaty was not hard they could get Austria's support in the future.

  2. To what extent was Germany economically modern but politically backward by 1914?

    Bismarck was head of the army, they played a key role in Germany and many Germans saw the army as a symbol of German superiority and greatness. Despite overruling in Germany, Democracy did exist. The Reichstag was elected every 5 years; they were a powerful influence in how Germany was run.

  1. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    be a necessary step for the liberalisation of the state and administration. Bismarck's establishment of the North German Confederation was a great step towards this goal. In this way the liberals were silenced, and the victory was seen as a victory over the Catholic/Lutheran/Calvinist Austria.6 In the Landtag elections of July 1866 the Prussian's went to the polls on (coincidentally)

  2. Hitlers Germany

    believe in his own magic, and accept the myth of himself as true, that his flair faltered. So much has been made of the charismatic nature of Hitter's leadership that it is easy to forget the astute and cynical politician in him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work