• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the system of alliances and ententes responsible for Britain entering the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent was the system of alliances and ententes responsible for Britain entering the First World War? The alliance system was partly to blame for Britain entering the war. Since 1880 Britain had been trying to avoid war. Initially Salisbury had tried to create a concert of Europe where all the European powers could discuss their grievances and sort them out amicably. When this failed mainly because Russia would not co-operate over the Balkans and because the Kaiser refused to negotiate with the British, the British attempted to achieve a balance of power between the European powers so that tension over Alsace-Lorraine, colonies in Africa and the Balkans would not lead to war. ...read more.

Middle

However, by 1914 this approach had also failed. Both the Alliance and the Entente believed that in the event of war Britain would support them. The Germans did not believe that the British would support the French, who were their main rivals in Africa or the Russians, who were interfering so annoyingly with trade with China that the British had made an alliance with the Japanese in 1902. On the other hand the French did not believe that the British would support the Germans who were their main trading and naval rivals. ...read more.

Conclusion

Others say that they were carried along by the jingoism of the British public, which had forgotten the horror of the last war Britain had fought in Europe over fifty years previously ? the Crimean War. The alliance system clearly played a major part in the outbreak of war and Britain did have influence in this, but for Britain it was probably not the most important reason. Fears of German power and arrogance and internal considerations played just as big a part in the decision to join in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Gladstone more responsible for the scramble for Africa than Disraeli?

    However Britain was ultimately forced to annex Egypt. This was significant in the scramble for Africa as it ultimately increased British influence and territory in Northern Africa. It also gave Britain a strong base for expanding southwards and ensured the protection of the Suez Canal.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    the criminal actions cornmitted by specific individuals in the name of the state. urisdiction for political guilt rests ultimately with the victor. Moral guilt involves the individual's awareness of serious transgressions or participation in unethical choices that resulted in specific wrongdoing.

  1. Vietnam war

    * The anti-war movement was followed by many Americans, not only students, but also radical lefts, and black citizens. These mass demonstrations were significant as they brought a sense of urgency and awareness to the American population regarding the heavy casualty situation in Vietnam and pressured the US government to withdraw US troops to satisfy angry American Citizens.

  2. The origins of the first world war

    gave the impression that the move was popular and politicians tend to agree with the public's popular mood to gain support. Some historians seem to suggest this invisible enemy could be the sole reason for war itself, yes it would take crises and rivalries to start a war but regarding

  1. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    Written just before the Battle of Britain, the emphasis is on holding air superiority over the island, "The crux of the matter is air superiority..." However, even after Churchill had got this report, he continued to advance the Commando idea throughout Whitehall, not only showing his eagerness to attack but

  2. "The first world war was the result of long-standing rivalries between the great powers". ...

    contributing factor to war, due to the evidence that shows a lack of direct aggression between the majority of European powers in the region. A naval race between Britain and Germany officially began in 1897. The naval race was a long-standing rivalry between Britain and Germany that was rooted in

  1. "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    This once again created more tension between the Great Powers of Europe. Austria-Hungary with the support of Germany presented an ultimatum to Serbia in order to withdraw her troops. Russia supported her "Slav brothers." But Russia saw herself incapable of achieving victory and withdrew.

  2. Germany was more responsible than Britain for the naval race before the First World ...

    "The efforts of great Britain to reduce the naval rivalry had failed for three successive years that the admiralty was forced in 1909, after reviewing the naval situation, to ask parliament to take exceptional measures to ensure the safety of the empire" However there was no agreement from Germany to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work