• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the system of alliances and ententes responsible for Britain entering the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what extent was the system of alliances and ententes responsible for Britain entering the First World War? The alliance system was partly to blame for Britain entering the war. Since 1880 Britain had been trying to avoid war. Initially Salisbury had tried to create a concert of Europe where all the European powers could discuss their grievances and sort them out amicably. When this failed mainly because Russia would not co-operate over the Balkans and because the Kaiser refused to negotiate with the British, the British attempted to achieve a balance of power between the European powers so that tension over Alsace-Lorraine, colonies in Africa and the Balkans would not lead to war. ...read more.


However, by 1914 this approach had also failed. Both the Alliance and the Entente believed that in the event of war Britain would support them. The Germans did not believe that the British would support the French, who were their main rivals in Africa or the Russians, who were interfering so annoyingly with trade with China that the British had made an alliance with the Japanese in 1902. On the other hand the French did not believe that the British would support the Germans who were their main trading and naval rivals. ...read more.


Others say that they were carried along by the jingoism of the British public, which had forgotten the horror of the last war Britain had fought in Europe over fifty years previously ? the Crimean War. The alliance system clearly played a major part in the outbreak of war and Britain did have influence in this, but for Britain it was probably not the most important reason. Fears of German power and arrogance and internal considerations played just as big a part in the decision to join in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "The first world war was the result of long-standing rivalries between the great powers". ...

    However, it is also true that alliances were formed because of short term conditions, such as German aggression. Alliances, therefore, were borne through long-standing rivalries but were escalated through short term factors. The reasons why these alliances came about are irrelevant in the context of the question.

  2. Was Gladstone more responsible for the scramble for Africa than Disraeli?

    However Britain was ultimately forced to annex Egypt. This was significant in the scramble for Africa as it ultimately increased British influence and territory in Northern Africa. It also gave Britain a strong base for expanding southwards and ensured the protection of the Suez Canal.

  1. "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    But three weeks later, the murder of Franz Ferdinand was no longer a burning grievance, which would now have dire consequences. The government of Austria-Hungary was willing to declare war even without drafting an ultimatum. Count Tisza, the Hungarian Prime Minister, wanted to avoid "the terrible calamity of a European

  2. Vietnam war

    50 % population of RVN lost homes * 12 provincial capitals and 51 district capitals destroyed * Economy 40 years behind other south-east Asian countries * 30,000 children from Hanoi and Haiphong deaf from noise of bombs * 65,000 vietnamese assisted by Americans to escape in 1975 * 130,000 more

  1. Free essay

    To What Extent Was The Crimean War A Series Of Accidents? ...

    This view can subsequently suggest why Aberdeen's government later left the anti- Turkish policy in favour of an anti-Russian one. The situation in 1840-50 proved to be a period of fluctuating relationships between the main powers. Britain and Russia for example, were understood to be "On reasonably good terms"5 and

  2. The Battle of Britain

    By day and by night they were heading for Dunkirk, if they did not know which way Dunkirk was, all they had to do was to head for the giant pall of smoke that rose from the burning oil storage depots there.

  1. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    and through it increase morale and determination at home and do industrial damage and destroy the morale of the enemy. The Commandos also had a second less - obvious purpose. They were to form the nucleus of a resistance force (like the French Resistance)

  2. Germany was more responsible than Britain for the naval race before the First World ...

    "The efforts of great Britain to reduce the naval rivalry had failed for three successive years that the admiralty was forced in 1909, after reviewing the naval situation, to ask parliament to take exceptional measures to ensure the safety of the empire" However there was no agreement from Germany to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work