• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Britain different to that of the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Germany and Japan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework To what extent was the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Britain different to that of the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Germany and Japan? According international law a POW is defined as "persons captured by a belligerent while fighting in the military." International law includes "rules on the treatment of prisoners of war but extends protection only to combatants. This excludes civilians who engage in hostilities (by international law they are war criminals) and forces that do not observe conventional requirements for combatants."1 In order to protect the rights of Prisoners of War a convention was set up which laid down the conditions in which a prisoner could be held. The experiences of the First World War meant the third convention could be adapted to be more protective of prisoners of war, in terms of food, accommodation, punishments and work, it stated that "no prisoner of war could be forced to disclose to his captor any information other than his identity (i.e., his name and rank, but not his military unit, home town, or address of relatives). Every prisoner of war was entitled to adequate food and medical care and had the right to exchange correspondence and receive parcels." The amount of food was to "be equivalent in quantity and quality to that of the depot troops." ...read more.

Middle

The first book uses sources from the Public Records Office, the Imperial War museum and the Australian War Memorial. A POW describes the lack of room in a camp in Singapore. "When I awoke in the morning I was still on the outhouse floor at the casualty clearing station", Reginald Burton.19 This shows it was beyond the medical staffs' capacity to house the POWs. This interpretation of Japanese treatment is from the book Railway of Hell by Reginald Burton. The books 'Railway of Hell' and 'The Emperors Guest' are primary accounts and similarly like the accounts of German and British treatment may be questionable. This is due to the inherent bias that it will contain the effects of the passage of time and the possibility that false memories may have been created. Appendix 821 is a photograph illustrating the limited accommodation provided. However, the image shows the outside of the building from one camera angle. Each country had problems with housing POWs. Both Britain and Germany violated the Geneva Convention to deal with the problem, while Japan used the prisoners for labour on the Burma-Thailand Railway. In terms of employment on the part of the British, there was a vast difference in the treatment of Italian and German POWs. The British view of Italians was different to the view of the Germans. They believed that fascism could be cured where Nazism could not. ...read more.

Conclusion

This act highlighted the countries intentions to comply with the Convention. However, shackling continued into 1943. Michael Walsh, historian for the 'Historian Press Review' in his article 'How the Allies treated German POWs', statement that "genocide, enslavement and institutionalised ill treatment of prisoners"32 were true of both sides. The punishments passed down by the Japanese were some of the most cruel and merciless of the three. Punishments when handed out consisted of the Bataan 'death marches', being hung by the thumbs, beheading and being locked in small cages made of bamboo for a period of time. The fact that the Convention was not ratified by the Japanese meant they had no specific rules by which to abide in terms of punishments except the armies own code of conduct. As such POWs were given little sympathy as surrender was not part of the army's code, Bushido. 33. The image shows an illustration by Jack Chalker example of a man being punished in one particular way; the container would hold either water or stones. Rewards were not uncommon for POWs in the case of the British Appendix 334 and Appendix 5.35 Beneath the hostilities the allies still provided equal opportunities once the war was over or repatriation had been granted. The policy was based around a points collection scheme for the criteria shown in Appendix 3. The employment of this policy shows the willingness of the British to provide fair treatment for their prisoners without prejudice. This method ensured that POWs who remained in Britain after their release prospered from equal opportunities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    Inflation was the greatest single economic factor as war budges rose to astronomical figures and massive demand forced shor! tages of many consumer goods. Virtually ever able-bodied person was employed to keep up with the demand. This combination of high demand, scarcity, and full employment sent prices soaring, even in the best managed countries.

  2. Vietnam War.

    Kosygin and sought his help in bringing Hanoi to the peace table. The war, however, dragged on. Two months after the meeting, President Johnson announced that US forces in Vietnam would be further increased to 525,000 by 1968. At the same time, US planes extended their bombings of North Vietnam to within 16 km (10 mi)

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Indeed, when Secretary of State Marshall used such arguments of self-interest with Congressmen, his words fell on deaf ears, particularly given the commitment of Republicans to cut government spending to the bone. It was at that moment. Dean Acheson recalled, that "in desperation I whispered to [Marshall] a request to speak.

  2. American History.

    - Furthermore, the colonists spread out over the years, founding Connecticut (1636), New Haven (1638), and New Hampshire (1638). But migration inevitably led to conflicts with the Indians. For instance, the first colonists to move to Connecticut under Thomas Hooker faced the Pequots, who realized that the arrival of the

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Lebanese Muslims believed that under the Melkart Agreement Palestinian refugees in Lebanon had been accorded a greater degree of self-determination than some Lebanese citizens. Inspired by this, they organized themselves politically and militarily and encouraged by the Palestinians tried to wrest similar concessions from the central government.

  2. How does Ballard use the different nationalities within 'Empire of the Sun' to convey ...

    'Private Kimura walked behind the rickshaw and kicked the wooden seat, hurling the vehicle against the coolie's legs', 'raising their staves, they each struck him a blow on the head, then strolled away as if deep in thought'. Jim whilst watching this horrid event appeared disconcerned he is described to be 'wondering whether to read an article about Winston Churchill'.

  1. Indian History. To what extent did large dams built before 1990 fulfil Nehru's ambitions?

    contribution to the increase in agricultural output of India, and thus to the decrease in poverty. In 1951, the food grain production was 52 million tonnes. In 1990, a record harvest of 170 million tonnes was achieved (Iyer, 1989, p.

  2. Free essay

    Why did the Nazis' treatment of the Jews change from

    Many people ran out of sympathy for the Jewish population and what was happening to them because the Germans were also facing hardships and with a war it was hard to get decent amounts of food, water and shelter. Many of the public had seen and witnessed brutality and violence

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work