• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Britain different to that of the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Germany and Japan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework To what extent was the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Britain different to that of the treatment of Prisoners of War held by Germany and Japan? According international law a POW is defined as "persons captured by a belligerent while fighting in the military." International law includes "rules on the treatment of prisoners of war but extends protection only to combatants. This excludes civilians who engage in hostilities (by international law they are war criminals) and forces that do not observe conventional requirements for combatants."1 In order to protect the rights of Prisoners of War a convention was set up which laid down the conditions in which a prisoner could be held. The experiences of the First World War meant the third convention could be adapted to be more protective of prisoners of war, in terms of food, accommodation, punishments and work, it stated that "no prisoner of war could be forced to disclose to his captor any information other than his identity (i.e., his name and rank, but not his military unit, home town, or address of relatives). Every prisoner of war was entitled to adequate food and medical care and had the right to exchange correspondence and receive parcels." The amount of food was to "be equivalent in quantity and quality to that of the depot troops." ...read more.

Middle

The first book uses sources from the Public Records Office, the Imperial War museum and the Australian War Memorial. A POW describes the lack of room in a camp in Singapore. "When I awoke in the morning I was still on the outhouse floor at the casualty clearing station", Reginald Burton.19 This shows it was beyond the medical staffs' capacity to house the POWs. This interpretation of Japanese treatment is from the book Railway of Hell by Reginald Burton. The books 'Railway of Hell' and 'The Emperors Guest' are primary accounts and similarly like the accounts of German and British treatment may be questionable. This is due to the inherent bias that it will contain the effects of the passage of time and the possibility that false memories may have been created. Appendix 821 is a photograph illustrating the limited accommodation provided. However, the image shows the outside of the building from one camera angle. Each country had problems with housing POWs. Both Britain and Germany violated the Geneva Convention to deal with the problem, while Japan used the prisoners for labour on the Burma-Thailand Railway. In terms of employment on the part of the British, there was a vast difference in the treatment of Italian and German POWs. The British view of Italians was different to the view of the Germans. They believed that fascism could be cured where Nazism could not. ...read more.

Conclusion

This act highlighted the countries intentions to comply with the Convention. However, shackling continued into 1943. Michael Walsh, historian for the 'Historian Press Review' in his article 'How the Allies treated German POWs', statement that "genocide, enslavement and institutionalised ill treatment of prisoners"32 were true of both sides. The punishments passed down by the Japanese were some of the most cruel and merciless of the three. Punishments when handed out consisted of the Bataan 'death marches', being hung by the thumbs, beheading and being locked in small cages made of bamboo for a period of time. The fact that the Convention was not ratified by the Japanese meant they had no specific rules by which to abide in terms of punishments except the armies own code of conduct. As such POWs were given little sympathy as surrender was not part of the army's code, Bushido. 33. The image shows an illustration by Jack Chalker example of a man being punished in one particular way; the container would hold either water or stones. Rewards were not uncommon for POWs in the case of the British Appendix 334 and Appendix 5.35 Beneath the hostilities the allies still provided equal opportunities once the war was over or repatriation had been granted. The policy was based around a points collection scheme for the criteria shown in Appendix 3. The employment of this policy shows the willingness of the British to provide fair treatment for their prisoners without prejudice. This method ensured that POWs who remained in Britain after their release prospered from equal opportunities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Although FDR accepted Stalin's figure as a basis for discussion, the British and Americans deferred any settlement of the issue, fearing that they would be left with the sole responsibility for feeding and housing the German people. The only agreement that could be reached was to refer the issue to a new tripartite commission.

  2. Which Country Was Most To Blame for WWII - Italy, Germany or Japan?

    Whilst it wasn't a direct cause of the war, it was the reason behind other causes. The reason that countries were invading other countries was because the depression had hit their industries so hard that they needed to take over other countries industries to recover.

  1. Vietnam War.

    Vietnamese delegates continued to insist upon complete US withdrawal as a condition for peace. In April 1970, US combat troops entered Cambodia following the political coup there. Within three months, the US campaign in Cambodia ended, but air attacks on North Vietnam were renewed.

  2. How And Why Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943?

    It grew in time to more than a million part-time soldiers, who received basic training and some arms to defend their local areas against the Germans in the event of an invasion. Land girls were a way for women to help the War effort.

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    Expanded police powers also included control of public information and opinion. The censorship of newspapers and personal mail was already an established practice. Governments regularly used their power to prevent disclosure of military secrets and the airing of dangerous opinions considering war efforts.

  2. To what extent can the Southerners be held responsible for the outbreak of the ...

    had to pay slaves wages similar to those paid to white labourers), her entire socio-economic system would probably collapse. However, this slavery fastened a backward, inefficient agrarian economy on the South and thus they did not experience the urban and industrial growth that took place in the North.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    In 1974 Druze leader Kamal Jumblatt established the Lebanese National Movement (formerly the Front for Progressive Parties and National Forces), an umbrella group comprising antigovernment forces. A military build-up was underway. Following the 1969 events, Kataeb Party members were involved in occasional military training.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    Explicit U.S. backing for the Shah, however, played a major role in influencing Russian non-intervention. Neither side had the will to start a sanctuary war in Iran; but, more importantly, neither Washington nor Moscow realized that the revolutionary movement was genuine and not simply the product of some limited, anti-progressive

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work